セール中 16%

Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

★★★★★ 4.8 (2,003)

F2.8通しの明るさと4段分の手ブレ補正機構を備え、前モデルより約10%軽量化された1020gの筐体は、機動性と描写力を両立しています。最短撮影距離170mmと1:2.7の最大撮影倍率により、標準ズームながら本格的な接写が可能な点が際立ちます。解像力と携帯性を求める旅行写真や、クローズアップ表現を多用するマクロ撮影を好むフォトグラファーに最適なレンズです。

Focal length 24-70mm
Aperture f/2.8
Mount Sony E
stabilization はい
Weather Sealed はい
Weight 1020 g
af type HSM
lens type zoom
Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art lens
97 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

30秒まとめ

純正の半額で、中央の写りは最高クラス。重さとAFのクセさえ飼い慣らせば、これ一本で戦える。

メリットとデメリット

長所

  • 中央の解像度は純正の高級レンズに匹敵、いや凌駕する場面も 98th
  • 手ぶれ補正が強力で、動画やスローシャッターでも頼りになる 94th
  • 防塵防滴の堅牢な造りで、現場での安心感が段違い 93rd
  • 純正の半額以下。この画質でこの価格は反則 89th

短所

  • 1020gの重量は正義。長時間の手持ちは正直キツい
  • AFが時々不安定。大事な一瞬を外すリスクはゼロじゃない
  • 個体差があり、前ピン・後ピンに当たるとUSBドック必須
  • 周辺部の甘さが気になる。風景の隅々まで完璧を求める人には不向き

オーナーの声

ユーザーの声

4.8/5 (2003 reviews)
👍 多くのオーナーが、この価格でこの解像度はありえないと驚いている。特に中央のシャープさは絶賛の嵐だ。
🤔 AFの信頼性については賛否両論。暗所で迷う、動画でノイズが乗るという報告が散見され、完璧なAFを期待すると肩透かしを食う。
👎 とにかく重い。1kg超えのレンズを一日中振り回すのは、覚悟がいる。三脚座が無いのも不満の種だ。

購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか

独自

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

購入者の評価は一定を保っています
85/100当社のAIによる感情分析信頼度: 高 · 165 件のソース · 2026年6月
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '17: 4.3★ · 13 レビューQ4 '17: 4.4★ · 5 レビューQ1 '18: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ2 '18: 4.8★ · 5 レビューQ3 '18: 4.6★ · 5 レビューQ4 '18: 4.5★ · 4 レビューQ1 '19: 4.7★ · 3 レビューQ3 '19: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ4 '19: 5.0★ · 6 レビューQ1 '20: 4.7★ · 6 レビューQ2 '20: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ3 '20: 4.3★ · 4 レビューQ4 '20: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ1 '21: 4.8★ · 4 レビューQ2 '21: 5.0★ · 9 レビューQ3 '21: 5.0★ · 5 レビューQ4 '21: 2.3★ · 3 レビューQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ3 '22: 4.0★ · 3 レビューQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ2 '23: 4.0★ · 1 レビューQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 13 レビューQ2 '26: 4.7★ · 6 レビューQ3 '26: 4.9★ · 9 レビューQ4 '26: 4.6★ · 5 レビュー (推定日)13535543166241495322321216413695Q3 '17Q2 '18Q1 '19Q1 '20Q4 '20Q3 '21Q2 '22Q2 '23Q2 '25Q2 '26Q4 '26
平均評価満足(4〜5★)不満(1〜2★)バーの高さ = レビュー件数推定日
  1. Q4 202688/1004.6★5 レビュー

    Buyers praise the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN II Art for sharp image quality, versatile range, and solid build. Autofocus is fast in good light but can hunt in low light.

    • Image quality is sharp, cinematic, and professional-grade.
    • Versatile 24-70mm range covers most shooting needs without lens swaps.
    • Great value compared to Sony GM, offering high performance at lower cost.
    • Autofocus is fast in good light but hunts in low light conditions.
  2. Q3 202693/1004.9★9 レビュー

    Buyers praise this lens as excellent, versatile, and a great value. Some note it is heavy but still recommend it.

    • Excellent image quality and versatility for video and run-and-gun shooting.
    • Great value compared to G series lenses, with competitive price.
    • Lens is heavy but still recommended; weight is a noted drawback.
    • Sharp center micro detail close to prime Sigma Art lenses.
  3. Q2 202682/1004.6★9 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, value, and versatility. A few note autofocus noise and low-light hunting.

    • Sharp image quality and good value for the price.
    • Versatile 24-70mm range suits hybrid photo/video work.
    • Autofocus noise makes audio unusable for video.
    • Autofocus hunts in low light, but fast in good light.
  4. Q1 202695/1005.0★13 レビュー

    Buyers praise this Sigma lens as excellent value, delivering sharp, crisp images comparable to pricier Sony GM II. It's a versatile, sturdy favorite for daily use.

    • Excellent value for money, often compared favorably to Sony GM II at half the price.
    • Sharp, crisp image quality with great color and depth.
    • Versatile and sturdy build, becoming a go-to lens for many.
    • One reviewer noted it's heavier than expected, but still very happy.
  5. Q4 202575/1004 レビュー

    Buyers praise image quality and color, but note the lens is heavy and may frustrate those without strong wrists or who don't edit RAW files.

    • Great color and image quality, comparable to Zeiss lenses.
    • Heavy but compact; may be frustrating for some shooting styles.
    • Sharpness and performance for portraits and landscapes.
    • Good for manual lens users seeking OIS and convenience.
  6. Q2 202580/1006 レビュー

    Buyers praise sharpness, build quality, and image stabilization. One user reports focus issues and softness at wide end.

    • Sharpness and build quality praised across Nikon D and Z cameras.
    • Great image stabilization and suitability for documentary filmmaking.
    • One user reports focus issues and soft spot at 24-35mm range.
    • Overall satisfaction with lens as a versatile all-rounder.
  7. Q3 202267/1004.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its build, clarity, bokeh, and low-light performance, but one reviewer found it disappointing.

    • Excellent build quality, clarity, and bokeh.
    • Great low-light performance and versatility as an everyday lens.
    • One reviewer felt the lens did not meet expectations.
  8. Q4 202133/1002.3★3 レビュー

    Mixed reviews: one buyer loves the lens for sharpness and build, but two others report it is not sharp or incompatible with Canon.

    • Lens is sharp, heavy in a good way, great for family shoots.
    • Lens not sharp at all, buyer returned it.
    • Lens incompatible with Canon despite being told otherwise.
  9. Q3 202195/1005.0★5 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, versatility, and build quality, though noted it is heavy.

    • Crisp, clear images with great versatility from 24-70mm at f/2.8.
    • Lens is heavy, but users accept it for performance.
    • Excellent build quality and fast delivery.
    • Great value for cinema and video work.
  10. Q2 2021100/1005.0★9 レビュー

    All 9 reviews are 5-star, praising image quality, sharpness, build, and value. Buyers highly recommend it for travel and professional use.

    • Excellent image quality and sharpness consistently highlighted.
    • Solid build and professional feel appreciated.
    • Fast and accurate autofocus noted.
    • Great value and versatility for travel and general use.
  11. Q1 202193/1004.8★4 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for its fantastic image quality, solid build, and versatility across Canon and Sony systems. One notes it is heavy but solves focus issues on older DSLRs.

    • Excellent image quality and sharpness, with one copy noted as sharper than others.
    • Solid build quality and good ergonomics, feels great in hand.
    • Works well with Sigma USB dock for micro focus adjustment on older Canon DSLRs.
    • Lens is very heavy, a notable con for some users.
  12. Q3 202065/1004.3★4 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens quality and value versus Nikon, but noted heavy weight and autofocus issues that required firmware updates.

    • Excellent image quality and value compared to Nikon's offering.
    • Heavy weight; some found it manageable, others too heavy.
    • Autofocus misses focus in about half of shots, even after firmware updates.
    • Smooth zoom/focus action and good for weddings and portraits.
  13. Q1 202087/1004.7★6 レビュー

    Buyers praise image quality and value versus Canon, but consistently note the lens is heavy, especially for long hikes.

    • Sharp images, fast aperture, great for street and art photography.
    • Good value compared to Canon counterpart.
    • Lens is heavy (2.5 lbs); needs a harness for trail use.
    • Works well with Canon 5DM4 and 6D Mark II.
  14. Q4 2019100/1005.0★6 レビュー

    All six reviews are 5-star, praising the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and value. Buyers recommend it as a great all-around lens.

    • Sharp image quality consistently highlighted across reviews.
    • Excellent build quality, comparable to Canon/Nikon.
    • Great value for money, not pricey for the quality.
    • Versatile lens, ideal for walking around and low light.
  15. Q1 201993/1004.7★3 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its quality and value, though some noted it is heavy.

    • Great image quality and ease of use
    • Good value for the price
    • Heavy weight noted as a drawback
    • Positive experience with Adorama store
  16. Q4 201890/1004.5★4 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sharp focus, weather sealing, and value, though some noted initial focus issues and weight.

    • Sharp focus, beautiful bokeh, and great flexibility for available light photography.
    • Weather sealing and image stabilization are highly valued for outdoor use.
    • Initial focus issues (back/front focusing) were easily fixed with optimization software.
    • Lens is a little heavy, but worth the price for studio and event work.
  17. Q3 201872/1004.6★5 レビュー

    Buyers praise sharpness and versatility, but one reports inconsistent autofocus and edge softness, calling it a dud compared to other Sigma lenses.

    • Sharp lens, great image quality, and versatile focal lengths for various photography needs.
    • Autofocus is fast but inconsistent; one user observed focus jumping at 70mm.
    • Edge sharpness is lacking; center sharpness is okay but not exceptional.
    • Zoom ring direction is reversed, which some find annoying but not a deal breaker.
  18. Q2 201888/1004.8★5 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens as sharp, versatile, and quick-focusing, but one notes soft corners and edges, especially at 24mm and 70mm, requiring micro-adjustment.

    • Sharp, clear, and versatile for portraits, landscapes, and low light; excellent image quality.
    • Soft extreme corners and edges at wide and telephoto ends, varying by focal length.
    • Requires significant micro-adjustment for sharpness; calibration via USB dock needed.
    • Fast and accurate autofocus, outperforming Canon and older Sigma models for run-and-gun shooting.
  19. Q1 2018100/1005.0★3 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, precision, and value, with one noting it's a great alternative to Nikon's version.

    • Sharpness and precision are excellent, matching or exceeding comparable lenses.
    • Great value for the price, especially as an alternative to pricier options.
    • Versatile focal length, ideal for wedding photography and general use.
    • Helpful customer service, encouraging repeat purchases.
  20. Q4 201784/1004.4★5 レビュー

    Buyers praised sharpness, image stabilization, and versatility, though some noted the lens is heavy and one reviewer hadn't tested it enough.

    • Sharpness and image quality are excellent.
    • Image stabilization and f/2.8 aperture are valued.
    • Lens is heavy but build quality is solid.
    • One reviewer couldn't provide definitive feedback due to limited use.
  21. Q3 201777/1004.3★13 レビュー

    Buyers praised sharpness, color, and build, but some reported autofocus inconsistency and back/front focus issues, especially on Nikon and Canon bodies.

    • Excellent sharpness, color, and bokeh; many prefer it over OEM lenses.
    • Autofocus inconsistency, back/front focus issues reported on some bodies.
    • Heavy and large; some find it cumbersome for travel or petite users.
    • Softness at wide end and at f/4 noted by a few reviewers.

日付のある顧客レビュー 135 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。

実証データ

パフォーマンス

光学性能は驚異的で、特に中央部のシャープネスはデータベース内でも98パーセンタイルと、まさに最高峰。開放f/2.8から使える切れ味で、風景からポートレートまで高精細に写し出す。手ぶれ補正も4段分と強力で、暗所での手持ち撮影の歩留まりが大幅に上がる。ただ、AF性能は55パーセンタイルと平均的で、暗所や低コントラストの被写体で迷うことがある。ユーザーからも「USBドックで微調整が必要」という声が多く、箱出しで完璧とはいかない個体もあるようだ。

パフォーマンス偏差値

AF 54.2
Bokeh 88.9
Build 40.6
Macro 85.9
Optical 98.1
Aperture 86.2
User Sentiment 64.1
Versatility 80.7
ユーザー評価 93.9
Stabilization 93

スペック

全スペック一覧

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 70
Elements 19
Groups 15
Aspherical Elements 4
ED Elements 3
Coating Super Multi-Layer Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/2.8
Min Aperture f/2.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Sony E
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 1.0 kg / 2.2 lbs
Filter Thread 82

AF & Stabilization

AF Type HSM
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 4

Focus

Min Focus Distance 170
Max Magnification 1:2.7

競合製品との比較

最大のライバルはタムロン 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3のような高倍率ズームではなく、キヤノン RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMやソニー G Master SEL70200GM2といった同クラスの明るい標準ズームだ。キヤノンRF28-70mmは軽量でAFも優秀だが、望遠端が70mm止まり。ソニーGMは70-200mmで望遠側に強いが、広角24mmが無い。シグマは24-70mmの焦点域とf/2.8の明るさ、そして強力なOSを兼ね備え、汎用性で一歩リードする。

Spec Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Pentax Limited Series HD DA 20-40mm F2.8-4 Limited DC WR Wide Zoom
Focal Length 24-70mm 28-300mm 17-28mm 18-135mm 28-200mm 20-40mm
Max Aperture f/2.8 f/4 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/4 f/2.8
Mount Sony E Sony E Nikon Z Sony E L-Mount Pentax K
Stabilization true true false true true true
Weather Sealed true true true false true true
Weight (g) 1020 590 450 326 413 283
AF Type HSM VXD linear motor Stepping Motor Linear motor Autofocus Autofocus
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilityユーザー評価Stabilization
Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art 54.288.940.685.998.186.264.180.793.993
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 97.780.764.18496.668.89197.952.380.3
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare 85.388.974.68487.886.29167.968.135
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 97.778.171.738.57879.945.495.990.880.3
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare 54.280.77773.291.768.822.295.575.699.4
Pentax Limited Series HD DA 20-40mm F2.8-4 Limited DC WR Wide Zoom Compare 54.288.986.196.559.686.245.472.256.580.3

価格

コストパフォーマンス

価格帯は$781からと異常なほど幅があるが、これは新旧モデルや中古が混在しているためだ。最新のDG DN II Artなら、純正のソニーGMやキヤノンLレンズと比べて圧倒的なコストパフォーマンス。予算を抑えつつ最高画質を求めるなら、これ以外の選択肢は考えにくい。

最安 MX$24,844 1店舗で2件の価格
Amazon 2件の価格 最安 MX$24,844

Price History

MX$22,000 MX$24,000 MX$26,000 MX$28,000 MX$30,000 5月3日5月30日7月5日10月23日 MX$24,844

詳細情報

概要

シグマの24-70mm f/2.8 Artは、純正レンズの半額以下で手に入るのに、中央の解像度はトップクラス。このレンズの本質は「コスパ最強のワークホース」だ。重さとAFのクセさえ許容できれば、これ一本でほとんどの撮影が高画質でこなせる。

よくある質問

Q: キヤノンの純正24-70mm f/2.8Lとどっちがいい?

予算が最優先ならシグマ一択。AFの信頼性とリセールバリューを重視するなら、多少高くても純正Lレンズを選ぶべき。画質の差は中央部ではほとんど無い。

Q: 動画撮影にも使える?

使えるが、AFの駆動音が気になる場面がある。外部マイクを使うか、MFでの運用を前提にした方が無難。手ぶれ補正は優秀だから、ジンバル無しでも結構いける。

Q: USBドックって本当に必要?

当たり個体を引けば不要。でも、このレンズのAF精度にはバラつきがあるから、ピントが微妙にズレると感じたらドックで微調整するのが解決への近道だ。

おすすめできない人

動き回る子供やスポーツを撮るなら、このレンズはやめておけ。AFの歩留まりでストレスが溜まる。素直にキヤノンRF28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMか、ソニーGMの最新モデルを買った方が幸せになれる。

総評

重さとAFのクセを許容できるなら、これは間違いなく「買い」だ。特にスタジオポートレートや風景写真がメインで、純正の高額レンズに手が届かないなら、このシグマが最高の答えになる。動体撮影がメインなら、AFの信頼性で純正に分がある。

用途別スコア

Macro (94.8)総合 (97)Budget (94.5)Street (77)Travel (74.1)Portrait (89.9)Landscape (86.4)Professional (90.3)Video Cinema (89.5)Wildlife Sports (72.9)

類似製品