Sirui IronStar Series 75 75mm

This three-lens anamorphic set spans 75–135mm with a fast T1.9 aperture, full-frame coverage, and an interchangeable ARRI PL/Canon EF mount. The neutral flare coating produces clean, character-rich images without strong colored artifacts, and the included circular polarizer and variable ND filter enhance on-set versatility. It’s ideal for independent filmmakers and portrait shooters who need anamorphic squeeze and cinematic depth of field at a relatively accessible cost.

Focal length 75-135mm
Aperture T16
Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Weight 1150 g
lens type prime
Sirui IronStar Series 75 75mm lens
42 Punteggio Complessivo
Prezzo 0 MXN
Nessuna offerta disponibile
Disponibile anche in:

Panoramica

The 30-Second Version

The Sirui IronStar 75, 100, and 135mm T1.9 set delivers genuine full-frame anamorphic character at a price that undercuts traditional cinema glass by a mile. The optical performance is well above average, with smooth bokeh and consistent rendering across the three focal lengths. But the build quality is a serious concern, landing near the bottom of our database, and the 800mm minimum focus distance is limiting. If you're a careful shooter working on a tripod, snag this at the $2999 price and enjoy the cinematic look. If you need rugged, go-anywhere glass, look elsewhere.

Pros & Cons

Pro

  • Full-frame anamorphic look at a fraction of traditional cinema lens prices 75th
  • Fast T1.9 aperture is consistent across all three focal lengths 70th
  • Interchangeable ARRI PL and Canon EF mounts add real versatility
  • 18-blade diaphragm produces smooth, oval bokeh with natural falloff
  • Neutral flare option gives cinematic character without overpowering blue tint

Contro

  • Build quality is a real weak spot, landing in the 12th percentile
  • 800mm minimum focus distance limits close-up work without diopters
  • No weather sealing means you're gambling in dusty or wet conditions
  • Heavy at 1150g per lens, which adds up fast on a gimbal or handheld rig
  • Price spread of over $1100 across vendors means you need to shop carefully

Le prove

Performance

Optically, the IronStar lenses land in the 75th percentile in our database, which puts them well above average. The 19 elements in 16 groups do some heavy lifting here. Sharpness is solid across the frame, even wide open at T1.9, and the anamorphic character is consistent between the three focal lengths. That's not always a given with budget anamorphic sets, where you sometimes get weird focus breathing or varying squeeze factors. The 18-blade diaphragm helps keep bokeh smooth and oval-shaped, landing in the 65th percentile for bokeh quality. It's not quite at the level of a set of Cooke Anamorphics, but it's a genuinely cinematic rendering that will make your footage look far more expensive than it is.

The T1.9 maximum aperture is right around the middle of the pack, at the 51st percentile. It's fast enough for most low-light situations, but don't expect to shoot by candlelight without some noise. The real-world implication is that you'll be fine in a dimly lit bar scene or at dusk, but you might be reaching for a bit more light than you would with a T1.4 spherical prime. The minimum focus distance of 800mm is a bit of a letdown, especially on the 135mm. You won't be getting any tight close-ups without diopters, which is something to budget for. The lack of autofocus and stabilization is expected for cinema glass, but it reinforces that this is a tripod or rig-mounted setup, not a handheld run-and-gun solution.

Performance Percentiles

AF 54.7
Bokeh 63
Build 12.3
Macro 40.5
Optical 74.8
Aperture 49.5
Versatility 70
Stabilization 35.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Prime
Focal Length Min 75
Focal Length Max 135
Elements 19
Groups 16

Aperture

Max Aperture T16
Min Aperture T1.9
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 18

Build

Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF
Format full-frame
Weight 1.1 kg / 2.5 lbs
Filter Thread 92

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 800

vs Competition

Stacking the IronStar set against the competition is a bit tricky because most of the alternatives in our database are spherical zooms or primes, not anamorphic sets. The Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS, for example, is a completely different beast. It's a superzoom for APS-C cameras with stabilization and autofocus, built for convenience and range. It will run circles around the Sirui for travel and versatility, but it won't give you that anamorphic character. The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR is in a similar camp, a do-everything zoom for stills and video that prioritizes focal range over cinematic rendering. If you need one lens to cover everything, those are your picks. If you want your footage to look like a movie, they're not.

The Tamron Di III and Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit options are also sharp, modern zooms with autofocus and stabilization, things the Sirui completely lacks. The Viltrox Air AF 14mm F4.0 is a budget wide-angle prime that's not even playing the same sport. The real competition for the IronStar set isn't in our top competitors list, it's from other anamorphic options like the Sirui Venus series or used glass from Atlas and Vazen. Compared to those, the IronStar set offers full-frame coverage and a more neutral look, but the build quality concerns are a significant differentiator. If you're rough on gear, spend more on something with better construction. If you're careful and want the look, the IronStar set is hard to beat on price.

Spec Sirui IronStar Series 75 75mm Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
Focal Length 75-135mm 16-300mm 18-300mm 28-70mm 28-200mm 16-85mm
Max Aperture T16 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/2.8 f/4 f/3.5
Mount Interchangeable Mount with Included ARRI PL/Canon EF Sony E Fujifilm X Canon RF L-Mount Nikon F
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true false true true false
Weight (g) 1150 615 92 495 413 59
AF Type - HLA VXD linear motor STM Autofocus AF-S
Lens Type prime zoom zoom zoom macro zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Prodotto AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilityStabilization
Sirui IronStar Series 75 75mm 54.76312.340.574.849.57035.6
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare 54.784.357.986.598.87799.699.1
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.17596.388.473.57799.280.5
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare 85.586.267.277.484.483.877.498.2
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare 54.777.973.989.590.971.595.799.4
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Compare 54.77598.459.864.17794.392.2

Prezzo

Value & Pricing

The price range on this set is wild. We're seeing it listed anywhere from $2999 to $4147 across different vendors. That's a spread of $1148 for the exact same kit. If you're paying the high end of that, you're getting into territory where you could start looking at used name-brand anamorphic glass or higher-end options from competitors. But if you snag it at the lower end, around three grand, the value proposition gets a lot more interesting. You're getting three full-frame anamorphic lenses with PL and EF mounts for roughly the price of a single entry-level anamorphic prime from a traditional cinema brand.

For portrait work, where this set scores a 56.8 out of 100, it's a solid investment if you're building a commercial or narrative reel. The budget score of 47.8 reflects that while it's cheap for anamorphic, it's still a significant outlay for most indie shooters. And the travel score of 34.1 is a clear signal that this isn't a grab-and-go kit. Factor in the cost of a good case, diopters for close focus, and possibly a lens support system given the weight, and the real-world cost creeps up. Shop around, and don't pay the $4147 price when the same glass is sitting at $2999 elsewhere.

Approfondisci

Overview

Anamorphic lenses used to be the kind of thing you'd rent for a shoot, not something you'd casually add to your cart. Sirui has been chipping away at that barrier for a while now, and the IronStar Series 75, 100, and 135mm T1.9/2.8 set is their most ambitious swing yet. This is a full-frame anamorphic kit with interchangeable ARRI PL and Canon EF mounts, covering a 46mm image circle, all for a price that, while not cheap, completely undercuts traditional cinema glass. The neutral flare version we're looking at here gives you those classic horizontal streaks and oval bokeh without the heavy blue tint that screams 'sci-fi homage'.

This set is clearly aimed at indie filmmakers, small production houses, and content creators who want that widescreen, cinematic look in-camera without dealing with crop factors or adapters. The three focal lengths cover a practical range for narrative work, from wider establishing shots at 75mm to tighter portraits and details at 135mm. And with a fast T1.9 aperture across the board, you're getting serious light-gathering ability and shallow depth of field control. But there's a catch, and it's a big one: the build quality. Our database puts it in the 12th percentile, which is a polite way of saying it's near the bottom of the barrel for construction.

So who's this for? Someone who prioritizes the image above all else and is willing to baby their gear. If you're shooting on a tripod in a controlled environment, the optical performance here is genuinely impressive for the money. If you're planning to run and gun in the rain or toss these in a bag without lens caps, you're going to have a bad time. The IronStar set is a fascinating trade-off, and we're going to dig into exactly where it shines and where it falls apart.

Common Questions

Q: Do these lenses cover full-frame sensors?

Yes, the IronStar set is designed for full-frame coverage with a 46mm image circle. They'll work on sensors like the Sony Venice, Canon C500 Mark II, or any full-frame mirrorless camera with the appropriate mount adapter. The interchangeable EF and PL mounts give you flexibility across different camera systems.

Q: What's the difference between the neutral and blue flare versions?

The neutral flare version produces more natural, white-ish horizontal streaks when pointed at light sources, while the blue flare version adds a pronounced sci-fi blue tint to those streaks. The neutral version is generally more versatile for different genres and moods, while the blue flare is a stronger stylistic choice that's popular for music videos and genre films.

Q: Can I use these lenses for photography?

You can, but you probably shouldn't. These are manual focus cinema lenses with no electronic communication to the camera body. You'd need to desqueeze the anamorphic image in post, and the lack of autofocus and stabilization makes them impractical for most stills work. They're built for video, and that's where they shine.

Q: How heavy are these lenses, and will they work on a gimbal?

Each lens weighs 1150g, which is about 2.5 pounds. That's heavy for a gimbal setup, especially once you factor in a follow focus and matte box. You'll need a gimbal with a high payload capacity like the DJI Ronin 2 or a well-balanced RS 3 Pro setup. For handheld work, a shoulder rig or Easyrig is a more practical choice.

Who Should Skip This

If you shoot in harsh conditions, dusty deserts, rainy exteriors, or anywhere you can't baby your gear, skip the IronStar set. The build quality is the weakest link here by a wide margin, and without weather sealing, you're one splash or sandstorm away from a very expensive paperweight. Look at something like the Sigma Contemporary zooms or a used set of Zeiss CP.3 lenses if you need durability. They won't give you anamorphic character, but they'll survive the shoot.

Also, if you need to work fast with a small crew or solo, the manual focus and lack of stabilization will slow you down considerably. Documentary shooters and event videographers should look at autofocus-capable spherical zooms like the Tamron Di III series. The anamorphic look is beautiful, but it's not worth missing the shot. And if you're primarily shooting close-ups or product work, the 800mm minimum focus distance will drive you crazy. Budget for a good set of diopters or consider a macro-capable spherical lens instead.

Verdict

If you're a narrative filmmaker or commercial director who wants that anamorphic look and mostly shoots on sticks in controlled environments, the IronStar set is a compelling entry point. The optical performance is strong, the neutral flare is versatile, and the interchangeable mount system means these lenses can follow you across camera bodies. Just budget for a good hard case and maybe a set of diopters, because you'll want them. At the $2999 end of the price spectrum, this is a lot of cinematic character for the money.

For run-and-gun shooters, documentary filmmakers, or anyone who needs to work fast in unpredictable conditions, this is not your set. The lack of autofocus, stabilization, and weather sealing, combined with build quality that's frankly concerning, makes these lenses a liability outside of a controlled set. You'd be better served by a high-end spherical zoom with autofocus, even if it means sacrificing the anamorphic look. The IronStar set is a specialty tool for a specific kind of shooter, and if that's you, you'll love what it does. If it's not, you'll hate what it doesn't.

Usage Scores

Macro (42.4)Complessivo (41.5)Budget (42)Street (42)Travel (31.1)Portrait (51.5)Landscape (37.5)Professional (38.5)Video Cinema (41.6)Wildlife Sports (38.4)

Prodotti simili