Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN micro-four-thirds
The 60mm f/2.8 prime lens, with a 120mm equivalent field of view on Micro Four Thirds, delivers sharp portraits with a 50cm minimum focus distance and 1:7.2 magnification. Its 190g weight and linear motor make it a compact, quiet option for street and video work, available in silver or black. Best for Micro Four Thirds shooters who want a lightweight, fast-aperture prime for street photography and portraits.
Nessun prezzo attuale dai rivenditori
Panoramica
The 30-Second Version
The Sigma 60mm F2.8 is the budget portrait king for Micro Four Thirds. Fast autofocus, sharp images, and a price that makes the Olympus 75mm look like highway robbery.
Pros & Cons
Pro
- Autofocus is stupid fast, 98th percentile fast 95th
- Sharp enough to embarrass lenses twice the price 86th
- Tiny and light at 190g, disappears in your bag 76th
- Bokeh is smooth and pleasant for a budget prime 73rd
Contro
- No image stabilization, keep that shutter speed up
- f/2.8 max aperture feels limiting in low light
- No weather sealing, don't take it out in the rain
- Plastic build feels a bit cheap in hand
Cosa dicono i proprietari
The Word on the Street
Come è cambiata l'opinione dei proprietari nel tempo
EsclusivaIn base a quando i clienti hanno effettivamente scritto le recensioni, per vedere se gli elogi iniziali sono durati.
Basato su 10 recensioni dei clienti datate, raggruppate per trimestre solare. L'analisi per periodo è in inglese.
Le prove
Performance
The autofocus surprised us most. It's sitting in the 98th percentile for AF speed, which is wild for a lens this cheap. The linear motor snaps into focus fast and quietly, no hunting in decent light. Optically it's solid but not spectacular, middle of the pack overall, but the bokeh at f/2.8 is smooth and creamy thanks to those 7 aperture blades. The 50cm minimum focus distance isn't macro territory, but it's close enough for tight headshots and detail work.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Prime |
| Focal Length Min | 60 |
| Focal Length Max | 60 |
| Coating | SLD |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | micro-four-thirds |
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.4 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 46 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Linear motor |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 500 |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.2 |
vs Competition
The obvious comparison is the Olympus 75mm f/1.8, which costs over twice as much and gives you an extra 1 1/3 stops of light. The Sigma is slower but nearly as sharp, and the autofocus is actually faster. Against the Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 12-35mm f/2.8, you're trading zoom flexibility for a dedicated portrait focal length with better bokeh. The Tamron 28-300mm is a completely different beast, a superzoom for full frame, so it's not really a fair fight. For pure portrait work on MFT, the Sigma is the value king.
| Spec | Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN | Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE | Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM | Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 | Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 60mm | 24-105mm | 35mm | 50-150mm | 70-180mm | 85mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/1.2 | f/2 | f/2.8 | f/1.8 |
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Canon RF | Sony E | Sony E | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format Coverage | micro-four-thirds | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame |
| Stabilization | false | true | false | false | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 190 | 1315 | 910 | 1340 | 855 | 452 |
| AF Type | Linear motor | Nano USM | VCM | XD linear motors | VXD | Linear Autofocus Motor |
| Lens Type | prime | zoom | prime | zoom | zoom | prime |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Prodotto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Reach | Video | Optical | Aperture | Wide Angle | Portability | Versatility | Riscontro degli utenti | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN | 95.4 | 48.5 | 30.7 | 32.1 | 75.9 | 72.5 | 5.2 | 44 | 11.4 | 85.8 | 32.9 | 61 | 66 | 36 |
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Compare | 89.9 | 78.9 | 95.3 | 69.3 | 73.7 | 88.2 | 98 | 44 | 74.7 | 11.1 | 91.9 | 87.9 | 8.1 | 96 |
| Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE Compare | 95.4 | 69.1 | 90.8 | 45.1 | 29.2 | 72.5 | 92.8 | 96.1 | 53.4 | 20.6 | 32.9 | 87.9 | 33.6 | 36 |
| Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM Compare | 95.4 | 96 | 98.9 | 51.9 | 80 | 88.2 | 95.7 | 64.1 | 40.2 | 10.9 | 82.1 | 92.6 | 7.2 | 36 |
| Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 Compare | 95.4 | 86.6 | 77.4 | 75.5 | 80.9 | 84.3 | 96.5 | 44 | 29.3 | 21.8 | 77 | 92.6 | 27.7 | 97.4 |
| Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 Compare | 95.4 | 82.9 | 77.4 | 29 | 65.7 | 72.5 | 48.5 | 74.7 | 19.8 | 55.9 | 32.9 | 87.9 | 39.2 | 82.3 |
Prezzo
Value & Pricing
At $339-351 USD, this lens is an absolute steal. You're getting autofocus performance that rivals lenses costing three times as much, and image quality that makes the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 look overpriced. If you're on Micro Four Thirds and want a portrait lens without selling a kidney, this is the obvious choice.
Price History
Approfondisci
Overview
The Sigma 60mm F2.8 EX DN is the lens you buy when you want Olympus 75mm f/1.8 image quality without the $800 gut punch. It's a 120mm equivalent on Micro Four Thirds, which sounds awkward on paper but turns out to be a killer portrait and street focal length. The one thing to know: this is a budget lens that punches way above its weight class optically, and the autofocus is genuinely best-in-class for the price.
Common Questions
Q: Is this lens good for portraits on Micro Four Thirds?
Yes, absolutely. The 120mm equivalent focal length is perfect for headshots and upper body portraits, and the f/2.8 aperture gives you nice subject separation. The bokeh is smooth and flattering.
Q: Does the lack of image stabilization matter?
It depends on your camera body. If your MFT body has IBIS, you're fine. If not, just keep your shutter speed at 1/125 or faster and you'll be okay. The lens is light enough that hand shake isn't a huge issue.
Q: Is this better than the Olympus 75mm f/1.8?
For the money, yes. The Olympus is faster and slightly sharper, but the Sigma costs less than half as much and the autofocus is actually quicker. Unless you absolutely need f/1.8, the Sigma is the smarter buy.
Who Should Skip This
If you need low light performance or super shallow depth of field, this isn't your lens. The f/2.8 aperture is fine for daylight portraits but struggles indoors without good lighting. Go grab the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 instead if you can stomach the price. And if you want a do-everything travel lens, look at the Panasonic Leica 12-35mm f/2.8 zoom.
Verdict
Buy it. If you shoot Micro Four Thirds and want a portrait lens, the Sigma 60mm F2.8 is the no-brainer choice. The autofocus alone is worth the price of admission, and the image quality will make you forget you're shooting with a budget lens. Just remember it's not stabilized, so keep your shutter speed at 1/125 or faster.
Usage Scores
- Macro17.5
- Complessivo39.4
- Budget62.6
- Street48
- Travel42.8
- Portrait43.2
- Landscape15.2
- Professional32.2
- Video Cinema37.3
- Wildlife Sports34.3