Tamron Al Adaptall 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6
The 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 full-frame zoom covers a versatile range while weighing just 78g, making it one of the lightest superzoom lenses available. Its Adaptall mount and manual focus operation support cross-system use, with LD aspherical elements maintaining manageable image quality in a compact, 72mm filter-threaded body. Best for travel and street photographers adapting vintage glass to digital mirrorless or Canon DSLR bodies, where its portability and focal length flexibility offset the lack of autofocus and stabilization.
Sin precio actual de tiendas
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
The Tamron Adaptall A17-200 ranks in the 98th percentile for portability and 96th for versatility, making it one of the best travel zooms in our database. At 78g with a 28-200mm range, it's a genuinely impressive piece of engineering. But manual focus only, no stabilization, and a slow f/3.8-5.6 aperture mean it's a specialty tool, not a daily driver.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- 98th percentile portability at just 78g 98th
- 96th percentile versatility with 28-200mm range 96th
- 89th percentile macro capability for close-up work 89th
- Adaptall mount works across most manual focus systems 83rd
- 72mm filter thread is common and cheap to accessorize
Desventajas
- Manual focus only, 21st percentile for AF
- No stabilization, 36th percentile
- f/3.8-5.6 aperture is slow, 22nd percentile
- Build quality in the 31st percentile, not weather sealed
- Video performance is rough at 20.7 out of 100
Las pruebas
Performance
The 28-200mm range is the headline. At 200mm you're getting reach that ranks in the 83rd percentile, which is well above average for a lens this small. The 13-element optical design includes LD and aspherical elements, and Tamron's claims about aberration control hold up reasonably well. Optical quality lands right at the 51st percentile, so it's solid but not going to embarrass a modern prime. Sharpness is fine in the center, softer at the edges, and the f/3.8-5.6 aperture means you'll want decent light.
Macro performance is a pleasant surprise at the 89th percentile. The 200mm minimum focus distance isn't true macro, but it's close enough for flower shots and detail work when you're traveling. Bokeh sits at the 60th percentile, which is about average. Don't expect creamy backgrounds at f/5.6 on the long end, but the compression at 200mm helps a bit. Manual focus is smooth and precise, which matters because you'll be doing all of it yourself.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 |
| Focal Length Max | 200 |
| Elements | 13 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/3.8-5.6 |
| Constant | No |
Build
| Mount | Adaptall |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 72 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 200 |
vs Competition
Against the Sigma Art 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II, this Tamron gets destroyed on aperture and optical quality, but it's a third of the price and covers 200mm. The Sigma is a professional workhorse, the Tamron is a travel toy. Compared to the Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2, there's no contest on image quality or low light, but the Viltrox is a prime that weighs more and costs far more. The Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 beats it on bokeh and build, but again, it's a prime. The Tamron's real competition is other superzooms, and in that niche, its portability percentile is genuinely top of the charts. The Sony G Master SEL100M28GM is a macro specialist that outclasses it in every optical metric, but it's a completely different tool at a completely different price.
| Spec | Tamron Al Adaptall 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 | Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE | Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 28-200mm | 24-105mm | 35mm | 50-150mm | 17-40mm | 50mm |
| Max Aperture | f/3.8-5.6 | f/2.8 | f/1.2 | f/2 | f/1.8 | f/1.2 |
| Mount | Adaptall | Canon RF | Sony E | Sony E | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format Coverage | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | APS-C | full-frame |
| Stabilization | false | true | false | false | false | false |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 78 | 1315 | 910 | 1340 | 535 | 1090 |
| AF Type | manual focus only | Nano USM | VCM | XD linear motors | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | Multi-Focus Stepping Motor AF System |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | prime | zoom | zoom | prime |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Reach | Video | Optical | Aperture | Wide Angle | Portability | Versatility | Valoración social | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamron Al Adaptall 28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 | 20.9 | 59.7 | 30.6 | 89.3 | 82.9 | 28.5 | 51.1 | 21.5 | 62.4 | 97.8 | 95.8 | 19.9 | 74.3 | 36.2 |
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Compare | 90.1 | 78.8 | 95 | 69.5 | 73.9 | 87.9 | 97.9 | 44 | 74.4 | 11.1 | 91.9 | 88 | 8.1 | 96 |
| Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE Compare | 95.4 | 69 | 90.5 | 45.3 | 29.5 | 72.1 | 92.7 | 96.1 | 53.2 | 20.6 | 33 | 88 | 33.4 | 36.2 |
| Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM Compare | 95.4 | 95.9 | 98.8 | 52 | 80.3 | 87.9 | 95.6 | 64.3 | 39.9 | 10.8 | 82.3 | 92.6 | 7.4 | 36.2 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare | 95.4 | 53.2 | 95 | 54.3 | 53.2 | 87.9 | 97.3 | 74.9 | 68.6 | 47.1 | 75.4 | 92.6 | 33.6 | 36.2 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S Compare | 68.7 | 80.6 | 77.2 | 38 | 43.9 | 72.1 | 87.5 | 96.1 | 39.9 | 15.4 | 33 | 96.2 | 18.8 | 36.2 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
At $280 USD across two US listings, this lens sits in the 75th percentile for affordability. That's decent, but it's not the screaming deal it used to be. You can find modern autofocus zooms with similar ranges for not much more, and they'll have stabilization and weather sealing. The value here depends entirely on whether you need the Adaptall mount. If you're shooting multiple vintage systems or want one lens that adapts to everything, the flexibility justifies the price. If you're on a single modern mount, you're paying for compatibility you won't use.
Leer más
Overview
The Tamron Adaptall A17-200 is a 28-200mm zoom that ranks in the 98th percentile for portability and the 96th for versatility in our database. That's a rare combination, and it's the whole story here. You get a massive focal range in a lens that weighs just 78g and takes 72mm filters, which makes it a genuinely easy travel companion. The f/3.8-5.6 aperture is nothing special, landing in the 22nd percentile, but for a walk-around lens this old and this light, the trade-off makes sense.
It's manual focus only, no stabilization, and not weather sealed. Those are real limitations, and they show up in the scores. Video comes in at a rough 20.7 out of 100, and build quality sits in the 31st percentile. But if you're shooting film or adapting to a mirrorless body for stills, the Adaptall mount system means this lens can follow you across camera systems. That flexibility is the main reason it still gets attention decades after release.
Common Questions
Q: Does this lens work on modern mirrorless cameras?
Yes, with an Adaptall-to-mirrorless adapter. The Adaptall mount system was designed to fit most manual focus SLR mounts, and cheap adapters exist for Sony E, Fuji X, Canon RF, and Micro Four Thirds. You'll be shooting fully manual with no electronic communication, but the lens will work.
Q: How sharp is the 28-200mm at the long end?
Optical quality ranks at the 51st percentile overall, so it's about average. At 200mm you'll see some softness at the edges, especially wide open at f/5.6. Stopping down to f/8 or f/11 helps noticeably. The LD and aspherical elements do a decent job controlling chromatic aberration, but this isn't a lens for pixel-peeping.
Q: Is this lens good for video?
No. Video performance scores 20.7 out of 100, which is one of the weakest areas in our database. Manual focus only, no stabilization, and a variable aperture that changes as you zoom make it frustrating for video work. If you're shooting video, look for something with autofocus and image stabilization.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you shoot video, need autofocus, or want a lens that can handle bad weather. The 20.7 out of 100 video score and 21st percentile AF ranking make it a poor fit for anything moving fast. Build quality in the 31st percentile means no weather sealing and a plastic feel that won't survive rough handling. If you're on a single modern camera system and don't need the Adaptall mount flexibility, you're better off with a native zoom that has stabilization and autofocus, even if it costs a bit more.
Verdict
The Tamron Adaptall A17-200 is a niche lens that does its niche extremely well. If you want one lightweight manual focus zoom that can jump between camera systems, the 98th percentile portability and 96th percentile versatility make it a compelling choice. The $280 USD price is fair for what it is. But if you're on a modern mirrorless or DSLR system and don't need the Adaptall mount, the slow aperture, lack of stabilization, and mediocre build quality will frustrate you. This is a lens for people who know exactly why they want it.
Usage Scores
- Macro40.1
- General34.3
- Budget56.3
- Street45.8
- Travel58
- Portrait37
- Landscape48.1
- Professional22.7
- Video Cinema20.7
- Wildlife Sports41.7