Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG IF Ultra

★★★★☆ 3.7 (25)

With a 15-30mm focal range, f/3.5-4.5 aperture, and Super Multi Coating that suppresses flare on digital bodies, this lens uses 17 elements—including two aspherical elements—to keep distortion in check. Its surprisingly strong 72.7/100 macro score delivers close-focus performance at just 30cm, adding versatility that’s rare in an ultra-wide zoom. It’s best for Nikon F-mount hobbyists who want a budget wide-angle zoom for architecture and landscapes while still getting tight detail shots at close range.

Focal length 15-30mm
Aperture f/3.5-4.5
Mount Canon EF
format coverage full-frame
Weight 615 g
lens type wide-angle
Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG IF Ultra lens
24 Puntuación global

Sin precio actual de tiendas

También disponible en:

Resumen

The 30-Second Version

The Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG is a budget ultra-wide zoom with genuinely good center sharpness and a useful focal range. But flare, soft corners on full-frame, and a cheap-feeling build hold it back. It's worth buying if you're on a tight budget and can live with the quirks, otherwise save for something better.

Pros & Cons

Ventajas

  • Excellent center sharpness, especially stopped down to f/8 91st
  • Great value on the used market compared to Nikon glass 71st
  • Genuinely useful 15-30mm range on both DX and FX
  • Optical quality punches above its price point

Desventajas

  • Flare and ghosting are a real problem in backlit scenes
  • Corners go soft on full-frame until you stop way down
  • Bulky and heavy at 615g with a cheap-feeling build
  • Filter use is impractical, which kills it for landscape shooters

Opinión de los propietarios

The Word on the Street

3.7/5 (25 reviews)
👍 Multiple owners praise the value, saying it's a solid budget alternative to Nikon's wide zooms
👎 A common complaint is significant flare and ghosting when shooting toward light sources
🤔 Build quality opinions are split, with some calling it solid and others finding it cheap-feeling

Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo

Exclusiva

Según cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.

La opinión de los propietarios se ha enfriado desde el lanzamiento
65/100Nuestro análisis de opinión con IAconfianza media · 13 fuentes · may 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '07: 4.0★ · 1 opiniónQ1 '08: 4.0★ · 1 opiniónQ2 '08: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ3 '08: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ1 '09: 3.0★ · 1 opiniónQ4 '12: 2.0★ · 1 opiniónQ2 '14: 4.0★ · 1 opiniónQ4 '14: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ3 '16: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ4 '20: 4.0★ · 1 opiniónQ1 '23: 3.5★ · 2 opinionesQ4 '25: 3.0★ · 1 opinión111111111121Q3 '07Q1 '08Q2 '08Q3 '08Q1 '09Q4 '12Q2 '14Q4 '14Q3 '16Q4 '20Q1 '23Q4 '25
Valoración mediaSatisfechos (4-5★)Insatisfechos (1-2★)Altura de la barra = número de opiniones

Basado en 13 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.

Las pruebas

Performance

Center sharpness is the headline here. Our optical score lands in the 85th percentile, which is genuinely impressive for a lens this old and this cheap. Stop down to f/8 and the middle of the frame is crisp. But the corners tell a different story, especially on full-frame where they go soft until you really close the aperture down. The Super Multi Coating helps with contrast and color, but flare and ghosting still sneak in when you point this thing anywhere near a light source. Autofocus is fine, not fast, and the motor makes enough noise that video shooters will want to stay away. No stabilization either, which is normal for this focal range but worth knowing if you shoot handheld in low light.

Performance Percentiles

Bokeh 14.5
Build 30.7
Macro 21.1
Reach 23.9
Video 28.6
Optical 61.2
Aperture 26.4
User Sentiment 8.3
Wide Angle 91
Portability 38.4
Versatility 71.4
Valoración social 16.7
Affordability 0
Stabilization 36.2

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Wide-angle
Focal Length Min 15
Focal Length Max 30
Elements 17
Groups 13
Aspherical Elements 2
Coating Super Multi Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/3.5-4.5
Constant No

Build

Mount Canon EF
Format full-frame
Weight 0.6 kg / 1.4 lbs

Focus

Min Focus Distance 300

vs Competition

Against the Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8, the Sigma loses on basically every metric except price. The Nikon is sharper in the corners, better built, and has a constant f/2.8 aperture. But it costs several times more. The Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm is a completely different beast, a superzoom with stabilization, but it starts at 28mm so you lose the ultra-wide end entirely. The 7Artisans 35mm F1.8 is sharper and faster but it's a prime, not a zoom. For pure wide-angle coverage on a budget, the Sigma holds its own against anything in its price bracket. Just don't expect it to hang with modern glass.

Spec Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG IF Ultra Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S
Focal Length 15-30mm 24-105mm 35mm 50-150mm 70-180mm 50mm
Max Aperture f/3.5-4.5 f/2.8 f/1.2 f/2 f/2.8 f/1.2
Mount Canon EF Canon RF Sony E Sony E Sony E Nikon Z
Format Coverage full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame
Stabilization false true false false true false
Weather Sealed false true true true true true
Weight (g) 615 1315 910 1340 855 1090
AF Type - Nano USM VCM XD linear motors VXD Multi-Focus Stepping Motor AF System
Lens Type wide-angle zoom prime zoom zoom prime
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Producto BokehBuildMacroReachVideoOpticalApertureUser SentimentWide AnglePortabilityVersatilityValoración socialAffordabilityStabilization
Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG IF Ultra 14.530.721.123.928.661.226.48.39138.471.416.7036.2
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Compare 78.795.169.573.98897.943.98274.511.191.988.18.196
Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE Compare 6990.645.329.572.292.696.18253.220.53388.133.436.2
Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM Compare 95.998.85280.38895.664.266.439.910.882.392.67.436.2
Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 Compare 86.577.375.881.184.196.543.966.429.221.877.592.627.897.3
Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f/1.2 S Compare 80.677.33843.972.287.596.192.839.915.33396.115.936.2

Precio

Value & Pricing

This is where the Sigma earns its keep. Buyers consistently call it a great budget alternative to Nikon's wide zooms, and the used market agrees. You're getting 85th percentile optical performance for a fraction of what a NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 costs. The catch is that you're also getting 17th percentile build quality and 8th percentile user sentiment. If you can live with the quirks, the value is hard to beat. If you can't, no amount of savings will make you happy.

Leer más

Overview

The Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG is an old-school ultra wide zoom that still pops up on the used market for Nikon shooters. It covers a genuinely useful range on both DX and FX bodies, and the center sharpness is surprisingly good for a budget lens from this era. The 17 elements in 13 groups with two aspherical elements do real work here, especially once you stop down past f/8.

But this lens has baggage. Flare is a constant companion, corners get mushy on full-frame, and the build feels more 'chunky plastic' than 'solid tool'. The 615g weight is noticeable, and the filter situation is basically a non-starter for anyone who likes using ND or polarizers. It's a value play, not a polished performer.

Common Questions

Q: Does this lens work on full-frame Nikon bodies?

Yes, it covers full-frame sensors, but corners get soft until you stop down to f/8 or beyond. On DX bodies you're using the sharpest part of the image circle, so it performs better there.

Q: Can I use screw-on filters with this lens?

Not easily. The front element bulges out, so standard screw-on filters don't fit. You'd need a specialized rear gel filter holder, which is awkward and limits your options.

Q: Is the autofocus quiet enough for video?

No. The AF motor is noticeably noisy, and several owners mention it in reviews. This is a stills lens, not something you'd want to use for video work.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you shoot landscapes at golden hour or anything backlit, because the flare will drive you nuts. Also skip it if you're on full-frame and demand edge-to-edge sharpness, or if you rely on filters for your workflow. Video shooters should look elsewhere too, the AF noise alone is a dealbreaker. If you need a quiet, modern, well-built ultra-wide, this isn't it.

Verdict

Buy this if you're a Nikon shooter on a tight budget who wants to try ultra-wide photography without selling a kidney. The center sharpness is legitimately good, and the 15-30mm range is versatile enough for landscapes, interiors, and architecture. Just know what you're signing up for: flare, soft corners on full-frame, and a build that feels like it came from a cereal box. If you can live with those compromises, this lens will serve you well. If you can't, save up for something newer.

Usage Scores

Macro (16.4)General (24.4)Budget (18.3)Street (30.8)Travel (27.5)Portrait (17)Landscape (55.2)Professional (27.9)Video Cinema (20.1)Wildlife Sports (16.7)
  • Macro16.4
  • General24.4
  • Budget18.3
  • Street30.8
  • Travel27.5
  • Portrait17
  • Landscape55.2
  • Professional27.9
  • Video Cinema20.1
  • Wildlife Sports16.7

Productos similares