New

KingFast F16N

★★★★★ 5.0 (1)
Capacity 1TB
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 4.0 x4
Read Speed 4,000 MB/s
NAND TLC
KingFast F16N ssd
41 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Snapshot

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

  • Below average endurance (14th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (28th percentile)

The proof

Performance

Performance Percentiles

Speed 64
Random 61
Feature 52.9
Capacity 54.7
Endurance 14.4
Social Proof 28

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 1000
Form Factor M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 4.0 x4
Protocol NVMe
PCIe Generation 4
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 4000
Sequential Write (MB/s) 3750

Hardware

NAND TLC

vs Competition

Spec KingFast F16N Samsung 9100 PRO Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X Crucial T500 Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Seagate FireCuda 530R
Capacity 1TB 8TB 4TB 2TB 2TB 4TB
Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 4,000 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache - true true true true false
Endurance - 4800 TBW 2400 TBW 1200 TBW 2000 TBW 5050 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityEnduranceSocial Proof
KingFast F16N 646152.954.714.428
Samsung 9100 PRO Compare 9999.899.798.185.895.6
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X Compare 88.29593.892.680.995.6
Crucial T500 Compare 93.896.49978.282.995.6
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare 92.993.793.878.293.895.6
Seagate FireCuda 530R Compare 92.596.352.992.695.488.5

Usage Scores

Overall (41.2)Budget (36.5)Gaming (45.3)Laptop (45.9)Console (35.5)Portable (11.7)Workstation (41.8)

A full written review is coming soon. The specs, scores, prices and charts above are always up to date.

Similar Products