Sigma Art 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II 24-70mm
A redesigned HLA autofocus motor and a 7% smaller, 10% lighter body than its predecessor make this a fast-handling f/2.8 standard zoom. Its 6.7-inch minimum focusing distance delivers a strong 1:2.7 magnification ratio, offering near-macro versatility uncommon in this class. This lens is best for hybrid shooters needing a single, weather-sealed tool that excels at both detailed close-ups and general landscape work.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 Art II is so sharp it's almost a problem for the competition. Buy it for the stunning optics and effective stabilization, but don't expect magical bokeh or flawless autofocus.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Class-leading center sharpness, even wide open 98th
- Effective 4-stop stabilization for rock-steady handheld shots 93rd
- Much lighter and smaller than the previous version 88th
- Aperture ring is a huge win for hybrid shooters 80th
Cons
- Bokeh is busy and a bit harsh, not a portrait lens
- Autofocus can be inconsistent in tricky light
- Still a heavy lens at over 1000g, you'll feel it after a long day
- No tripod collar included, and you'll want one for video work
What owners think
The Word on the Street
How owner sentiment changed over time
ExclusiveBased on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.
Based on 131 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.
The proof
Performance
The center sharpness is what really surprised us. It's bitingly sharp wide open at f/2.8, and it just gets better from there. The new HLA autofocus motor is fast and nearly silent for stills, though we did notice it can hunt a little in low-contrast scenes compared to the top-tier Sony glass. The stabilization is a standout, rated for 4 stops and landing in the 92nd percentile in our database. It makes handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds a breeze. The big letdown is the bokeh, which sits in a disappointing 28th percentile. It's a bit busy and nervous, so don't expect that creamy, buttery background blur you'd get from a fast prime.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 |
| Focal Length Max | 70 |
| Elements | 19 |
| Groups | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4 |
| ED Elements | 3 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 1.0 kg / 2.2 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 82 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | HSM |
| Stabilization | Yes |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 170 |
| Max Magnification | 1:2.7 |
vs Competition
The obvious rival is the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II. The Sony is lighter and has slightly faster, more reliable autofocus, but the Sigma is optically its equal or better in the center and costs a lot less. The Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM is another strong competitor for Canon shooters, but it's a different mount and a slightly different focal range. If you're on Sony E-mount, the Sigma is the smarter buy unless you absolutely need the most bulletproof AF for fast-paced sports. Skip the Tamron 18-300mm comparison entirely, that's a superzoom for a completely different crowd.
| Spec | Sigma Art 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II 24-70mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 VXD G2 | Sony G SELP28135G.SYX | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-70mm | 17-28mm | 28-75mm | 28-135mm | 20-60mm | 18mm |
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/4 | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon Z | Sony E | Sony E | L-Mount | Fujifilm X |
| Stabilization | true | false | false | true | false | false |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 1020 | 450 | 540 | 420 | 350 | 370 |
| AF Type | HSM | Stepping Motor | VXD | SSM | stepping motor | Linear motor |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | prime |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma Art 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II 24-70mm | 54.6 | 25.9 | 39.7 | 88.3 | 97.7 | 22.6 | 63.3 | 80.1 | 77.9 | 92.8 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare | 87 | 88.1 | 73.6 | 86.3 | 87 | 85.8 | 90.8 | 68.1 | 64.6 | 38 |
| Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 VXD G2 Compare | 54.6 | 88.1 | 67.2 | 87.3 | 87.8 | 85.8 | 80.4 | 78.2 | 83.1 | 38 |
| Sony G SELP28135G.SYX Compare | 94.2 | 80.2 | 75.5 | 31.2 | 87 | 69.9 | 63.3 | 92.4 | 50.2 | 92.8 |
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 Compare | 87 | 86.1 | 80.6 | 66.2 | 76.4 | 79.8 | 0 | 81.5 | 64.9 | 38 |
| Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR Compare | 98 | 41.2 | 79.4 | 84.1 | 83.4 | 45.8 | 90.8 | 33.6 | 87.9 | 38 |
Price
Value & Pricing
This is where Sigma usually wins, and the Art II is no exception. It delivers optical performance that punches way above its class, often nipping at the heels of lenses costing twice as much. The price spread across vendors is wild, from $781 to a ridiculous $199,800, so just ignore the outliers and grab it from a reputable dealer. For the real-world street price, you're getting a lens that makes the Sony 24-70mm GM II look overpriced.
Amazon.com.mx 2 offers From MX$27,250
Price History
Read more
Overview
The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art is the sharpest standard zoom we've tested in a long time, and it's a genuine problem for Sony's own GM II. Sigma shrunk the body, added an aperture ring, and cranked up the resolving power to a level that's basically best-in-class. The optical score in our database puts it in the 98th percentile, which is just absurd for a zoom. If you're a Sony shooter who wants pro-level image quality without the pro-level price tag, this is the one to beat.
Common Questions
Q: Does this lens have an aperture ring?
Yes, and it's one of the best upgrades from the old version. You can click it for stills or de-click it for smooth, silent aperture pulls during video.
Q: Is the autofocus good enough for video?
It's quiet and generally smooth, but it can pulse a bit when tracking subjects in low light. For critical video AF, native Sony glass is still more reliable.
Q: How does it compare to the Sony 24-70mm GM II?
The Sigma is sharper in the center, has better stabilization, and costs way less. The Sony is lighter, has slightly better corner sharpness, and its autofocus is more confident in bad light.
Who Should Skip This
If you're a portrait photographer chasing creamy, dreamy bokeh, this isn't your lens. The background rendering is just too harsh. Go grab a fast prime like the Sony 85mm f/1.4 GM instead. And if you're a run-and-gun sports shooter who needs absolute AF reliability in every single frame, the native Sony GM II is the safer, if pricier, bet.
Verdict
The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art is the new default standard zoom for Sony shooters who care about image quality first. It's not perfect, the bokeh won't win any awards and the AF isn't quite Sony-native snappy, but the sheer resolving power and build quality for the price make it an easy recommendation. This is the lens that makes you question why you'd spend more.