Sony G Master SEL2470GM 24-70mm

★★★★★ 4.7 (3,374)

A 22% weight reduction to just 695g makes this the lightest f/2.8 standard zoom in its class, paired with four XD Linear Motors for near-instant autofocus. Its Nano AR Coating II effectively suppresses flare and ghosting for exceptional clarity, while the 0.32x maximum magnification adds versatile close-up capability. This lens is best for landscape and travel photographers who need a rugged, weather-sealed workhorse without the bulk.

Focal length 24-70mm
Aperture f/22
Mount Sony E
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 695 g
af type XD Linear Motors
lens type zoom
Sony G Master SEL2470GM 24-70mm lens
72 Overall Score
Price MX$0
No listings available
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II is one of the sharpest, fastest-focusing standard zooms we've ever tested. It's lighter than the original and delivers best-in-class autofocus. It's pricey and lacks stabilization, but if you're a Sony pro who needs the best, this is it.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Razor-sharp across the frame even at f/2.8. 98th
  • Autofocus is near-instant and dead silent. 97th
  • Significantly lighter and more compact than the original. 88th
  • Weather-sealed build handles rough conditions. 81st

Cons

  • Bokeh is fine but won't blow you away.
  • No optical stabilization built in.
  • The plastic lens hood feels cheap for this price.
  • Quality control issues like dust ingress pop up in user reports.

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.7/5 (3374 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the exceptional sharpness and instant autofocus, calling it a true workhorse lens.
👎 A recurring complaint is the high price and the surprisingly heavy feel for a lens marketed as portable.
🤔 Several users mention quality control concerns like dust getting inside the lens or a loose front element.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has cooled since launch
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '19: 5.0★ · 5 reviewsQ1 '20: 4.6★ · 7 reviewsQ2 '20: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '20: 4.5★ · 8 reviewsQ4 '20: 5.0★ · 5 reviewsQ1 '21: 4.9★ · 7 reviewsQ2 '21: 4.8★ · 13 reviewsQ3 '21: 5.0★ · 4 reviewsQ4 '21: 4.8★ · 12 reviewsQ1 '22: 4.0★ · 5 reviewsQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ3 '22: 4.9★ · 18 reviewsQ4 '22: 3.0★ · 5 reviewsQ1 '23: 4.7★ · 7 reviewsQ2 '23: 4.8★ · 8 reviewsQ3 '23: 4.4★ · 9 reviewsQ4 '23: 4.9★ · 12 reviewsQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 6 reviewsQ2 '24: 4.2★ · 10 reviewsQ3 '24: 4.6★ · 9 reviewsQ4 '24: 4.4★ · 7 reviewsQ1 '25: 4.9★ · 12 reviewsQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 3 reviewsQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 6 reviewsQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 27 reviewsQ2 '26: 3.5★ · 8 reviews5728571341253185789126109712336278Q4 '19Q3 '20Q2 '21Q1 '22Q4 '22Q3 '23Q2 '24Q1 '25Q4 '25Q2 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews

Based on 221 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Autofocus is stupid fast. We're talking 98th percentile in our database, which puts it among the absolute best right now. The four XD linear motors lock on instantly and track silently, so video shooters will be just as happy as stills photographers. Optically, it's a top-tier performer at 97th percentile. Sharpness is exceptional wide open at f/2.8 across the entire zoom range, and the Nano AR Coating II handles flare like a champ. The weak spot? Bokeh is middle of the pack at the 40th percentile. It's pleasant and smooth thanks to the 11-blade diaphragm, but don't expect the dreamy separation you'd get from a fast prime. And there's no stabilization here, which lands it in the bottom half of our rankings. If your body has IBIS you're fine, but it's worth knowing.

Performance Percentiles

AF 98.1
Bokeh 40.1
Build 51.8
Macro 44.9
Optical 97.1
Aperture 24
Versatility 80.7
Social Proof 88
Stabilization 35.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 70
Elements 20
Groups 15
Aspherical Elements 2
ED Elements 4
Coating Nano AR Coating II and Fluorine Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/22
Min Aperture f/2.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 11

Build

Mount Sony E
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs
Filter Thread 82

AF & Stabilization

AF Type XD Linear Motors
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 210
Max Magnification 0.32x

vs Competition

The Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM is the most direct rival and it includes stabilization, which Sony skips. That's a real advantage for Canon shooters. The Tamron 18-300mm offers way more reach and costs less, but you sacrifice the constant f/2.8 aperture and that top-shelf optical quality. The Sigma 16-300mm is another superzoom competitor that prioritizes versatility over outright image quality. If you need one lens that does everything from wide landscapes to tight portraits with zero compromises in sharpness or autofocus, the Sony still leads the pack. But if you want stabilization or a lighter wallet, those other options are worth a hard look.

Spec Sony G Master SEL2470GM 24-70mm Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
Focal Length 24-70mm 16-300mm 18-300mm 28-70mm 28-200mm 16-85mm
Max Aperture f/22 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/2.8 f/4 f/3.5
Mount Sony E Sony E Fujifilm X Canon RF L-Mount Nikon F
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed true true false true true false
Weight (g) 695 615 92 495 413 59
AF Type XD Linear Motors HLA VXD linear motor STM Autofocus AF-S
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom macro zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Sony G Master SEL2470GM 24-70mm 98.140.151.844.997.12480.78835.6
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare 54.68457.886.598.876.899.683.199.1
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.174.896.388.473.576.899.283.180.5
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare 85.48667.277.384.483.777.58898.3
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare 54.677.773.889.590.971.295.675.499.4
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Compare 54.674.898.459.764.176.894.38892.2

Price

Value & Pricing

Let's be real, this lens is expensive. The price spread across vendors is wild, ranging from $1314 to $3596. If you can snag it at the lower end of that range, it's a solid investment for a working pro. At full retail near $3600, you're paying a serious premium for the Sony badge and that last 5% of performance. The value score sits at 77.8 out of 100, which is well above average for this category. It's not a bargain, but it's a tool that will earn its keep for years. Shop around and avoid paying anywhere near the top of that price range.

Read more

Overview

Sony took everything pros loved about the original 24-70mm GM and put it on a diet. The GM II is 22% lighter and noticeably smaller, which makes a real difference when it's glued to your camera all day. At 695g, it balances beautifully on modern Alpha bodies without feeling front-heavy. The constant f/2.8 aperture is still here, and the optical performance is basically flawless from corner to corner. This is the lens you grab when you can only bring one, and it needs to nail every single shot.

Common Questions

Q: Does this lens have image stabilization?

No, the lens itself does not have optical stabilization. It relies on the in-body stabilization (IBIS) of Sony Alpha cameras, which works well for most shooting situations.

Q: Is the f/2.8 aperture constant throughout the zoom range?

Yes, it maintains a constant f/2.8 maximum aperture from 24mm all the way to 70mm, which is great for consistent exposure and low-light shooting.

Q: How much lighter is this compared to the original version?

It's about 22% lighter and 18% smaller than the first-generation 24-70mm GM, weighing in at 695g. The difference is immediately noticeable on the camera.

Who Should Skip This

If you're a hobbyist or casual shooter, the price and weight are probably overkill. You'll get 90% of the performance from something like a Tamron zoom for half the cost. And if you shoot a lot of handheld video without a gimbal, the lack of lens stabilization might push you toward the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM instead.

Verdict

This is the standard zoom for Sony shooters who refuse to compromise on image quality or autofocus speed. Wedding photographers, event shooters, and anyone who needs a do-it-all workhorse will find it indispensable. The weight savings over the original make it viable for all-day use, and the optical performance is as good as it gets in a zoom. Just budget for it and maybe grab a third-party lens hood.

Usage Scores

Macro (66.4)Overall (72.4)Budget (77.8)Street (62.4)Travel (68.5)Portrait (56.7)Landscape (82.7)Professional (71.9)Video Cinema (70.1)Wildlife Sports (73.4)

Similar Products