Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox
86 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
77 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Viltrox
100
Nikon
73
Video Cinema
Viltrox
94
Nikon
75
Professional
Viltrox
88
Nikon
69
Budget
Viltrox
83
Nikon
78
Street
Viltrox
82
Nikon
67
Macro
Viltrox
66
Nikon
82
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
71
Nikon
55
Landscape
Viltrox
69
Nikon
62
Travel
Viltrox
55
Nikon
55

Specifications

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mmNikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min27 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max27 mm35 mm
Elements1517
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements22
CoatingHD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coatingNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.2f/4
Min Aperturef/1.2f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.56 kg★0.68 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Silent Wave Motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—2.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★290 mm
Max Magnification0.15x1:4★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm Better at:

BudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Better at:

Macro

Also Consider