LG UltraWide 38WR85QC-W 37.5" White 2023

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben — so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

1. Q4 202596/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the monitor's sleek design, ample screen real estate, and ability to replace multiple monitors. One noted it is very bright in dark rooms.

   • 👍Sleek white design complements office aesthetics.
   • 👍Excellent screen real estate for multitasking and work.
   • 👍Replaces multiple monitors, saving desk space.
   • 👎Excessive brightness in dark rooms, lacking adjustment.
2. Q2 202567/1003.7★3 Bewertungen

   Positive on clarity, size, and connectivity; one severe software issue with KVM can't be installed.

   • 👍Excellent clarity and screen size praised by one buyer.
   • 👎KVM switch software fails to install on multiple PCs, causes kernel error.
   • 👍Great resolution, connectivity, and 50/50 split input feature well received.
   • 👎Software failure is the primary reason for purchase, potential return considered.
3. Q1 202580/1004.7★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers in Q1 2025 praised the monitor's size, productivity, and gaming performance, with some noting a scratch issue and limited dimming zones.

   • 👍Monitor is excellent for both work and gaming, with great HDR and KVM.
   • 🤔High price is justified by features, but local dimming zones are large and few.
   • 👎One unit arrived with a large vertical scratch across the screen.
4. Q4 202459/1004.4★8 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the monitor for productivity and gaming, but some report defects like dead USB ports, excessive brightness, and a bright power LED that turns on randomly.

   • 👍Excellent for WFH and gaming, with great screen real estate, KVM, and text clarity.
   • 🤔Some units have defects: dead USB ports, excessive brightness, and a power LED that ignores the off setting.
   • 🤔Built-in speakers have occasional static distortion on mid-heavy music; external speakers are recommended.
   • 👎Several design flaws: poor split-screen behavior, LAN only for one input, and overly complex menu navigation.
5. Q3 202486/1005.0★7 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the monitor's vibrant colors, size, resolution, and brightness, though one noted a cheap, wobbly stand and a short DisplayPort cable.

   • 👍Vibrant colors and high brightness praised for both work and gaming.
   • 👍Size and resolution sweet spot, with text clarity and good for productivity.
   • 🤔Stand described as cheap and wobbly; DisplayPort cable too short.
   • 👍Easy setup, good IO, and included cables appreciated.
6. Q2 202475/1004.3★4 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the monitor for consolidating multiple windows, sleek design, and USB-C laptop power. One notes poor design for vertical stacking due to power button placement.

   • 👍Excellent for consolidating many windows, boosting productivity and even reducing migraines.
   • 👍Sleek, contemporary look fits well in white/grey office spaces.
   • 👍Great value with USB-C powering MacBook, plus good picture and speakers.
   • 👎Cannot stack vertically because power joystick is at bottom center of screen.
7. Q1 202467/1004.5★3 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the monitor's versatility for office, gaming, and media editing but express disappointment over LG not releasing an OLED version.

   • 👍Excellent for multitasking: home office, gaming, and media editing.
   • 🤔Desire for an OLED version, with frustration at LG's delay.
   • 👍Comfortable for work-from-home setups.
   • 👎No mention of defects or reliability issues.

Basierend auf 35 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.