Neu

LG gram +view gram +view 16" Silver

★★★★☆ 4.4 (175)
Screen 16
Resolution 2560 x 1600
Panel IPS
Refresh 60 Hz
response time ms 30
LG gram +view gram +view 16" Silver monitor
49 Gesamtbewertung
Preis 0 MX$
Keine Angebote verfügbar
Auch erhältlich in:

Snapshot

Vor- und Nachteile

Pros

  • Strong compact (99th percentile) 99th
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile) 86th
  • Strong color (75th percentile) 75th

Cons

  • Below average performance (0th percentile)
  • Below average feature (23th percentile)

What owners think

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben — so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '22: 4.9★ · 7 BewertungenQ3 '22: 4.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ4 '22: 3.9★ · 12 BewertungenQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '23: 4.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ3 '23: 3.6★ · 5 BewertungenQ4 '23: 4.7★ · 3 BewertungenQ1 '24: 4.2★ · 11 BewertungenQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 8 BewertungenQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 1 BewertungQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 1 Bewertung72121353113811211Q2 '22Q4 '22Q2 '23Q4 '23Q2 '24Q1 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen
  1. Q3 202472/1005.0★8 Bewertungen

    Portable, lightweight, and crisp display praised by remote workers and travelers. Some noted lack of color controls and 60Hz limit, but overall very positive for travel and productivity.

    • Highly portable and lightweight, ideal for travel and remote work.
    • Sharp, bright display with great clarity and easy plug-and-play setup.
    • Color controls limited but workable via profiles; 60Hz refresh noted.
    • Works across devices (Chromebook, Surface, MacBook) and useful for dual-monitor setups.
  2. Q1 202457/1004.3★11 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the display quality and portability but strongly criticize the weak, poorly designed stand/cover and lack of case. Some also note the monitor is larger than expected and has limited settings.

    • Stand/cover is weak, unstable, and falls off easily; users recommend buying a separate case.
    • Display quality is crisp, bright, and color-accurate; preferred over other monitors tested.
    • Size is larger than expected with thick bezels; more portable than a full desktop but not laptop-lid sized.
    • Compatibility issues with hubs and HDMI; works directly with laptops but not through some connectors.
  3. Q3 202360/1003.6★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise picture quality and Mac compatibility, but reliability issues cause failures after a few months. Some want better features and build.

    • Excellent image quality, color, and clarity with Macs
    • Works great initially, but some units fail after a few months
    • Defective units: monitor powers on but doesn't connect to computer
    • Magnetic stand/cover is unstable; no instructions for setup
  4. Q4 202271/1003.9★12 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the monitor's picture quality, light weight, and productivity boost. However, a significant minority reported fragility, Thunderbolt 4 incompatibility, and early failures with poor LG support.

    • Excellent picture quality, thin and light design, easy plug-and-play USB-C setup.
    • Boosts productivity as a portable second screen for remote work or travel.
    • Screen cracked easily; fragile magnetic stand risks drops if picked up wrong.
    • Incompatible with Intel Thunderbolt 4 laptops — monitor turns on but no image.
  5. Q2 202290/1004.9★7 Bewertungen

    Buyers love the slim, lightweight design and easy plug-and-play setup. Picture quality is excellent, though portrait mode software is PC-only and some laptops may have resolution mismatch.

    • Extremely lightweight and portable, easy to carry and set up anywhere.
    • Excellent picture quality and resolution, with minimal glare.
    • Easy plug-and-play via USB-C, but portrait mode requires PC-only software.
    • Some smaller laptops may show black bars due to resolution mismatch.

Basierend auf 61 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

The proof

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

Color 74.8
Portability 99.2
Display 62
Feature 23.4
Ergonomic 40
Performance 0.2
Connectivity 54.1
Social Proof 86.4

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Display

Size 16"
Resolution 2560 (QHD)
Panel Type IPS
Aspect Ratio 16:10
Curved No

Performance

Refresh Rate 60 Hz
Response Time 30

Color & HDR

Brightness 350 nits
Color Gamut DCI-P3 99%

Connectivity

HDMI Ports 0
DisplayPort 0
USB-C 2
Speakers No
Headphone Jack No

Ergonomics

Height Adjustable No
Tilt No
Swivel No
Pivot Yes

Features

Webcam No
Touchscreen No
PIP/PBP No
Power 8
Weight 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs

Im Vergleich

Spec LG gram +view gram +view 16" ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW
Screen Size 16 26.5 57 27 39.70000076293945 34
Resolution 2560 x 1600 2560 x 1440 7680 x 2160 3840 x 2160 5120 x 2160 3440x1440
Panel Type IPS OLED VA OLED IPS QD-OLED
Refresh Rate 60 240 240 240 120 240
Response Time Ms 30 0.029999999329447746 1 0.029999999329447746 5 0.029999999329447746
Adaptive Sync - FreeSync Premium Pro FreeSync Premium Pro G-Sync Compatible Adaptive-Sync FreeSync Premium Pro
Hdr - HDR10 HDR10+ DisplayHDR True Black 400 DisplayHDR 600 DisplayHDR 400 True Black
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product ColorCompactDisplayFeatureErgonomicPerformanceConnectivitySocial Proof
LG gram +view gram +view 16" 74.899.26223.4400.254.186.4
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG Compare 96.57475.772.690.697.993.286.4
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC Compare 99.432.399.797.472.487.793.295.7
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED Compare 95.964.197.386.590.697.982.475
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Compare 97.682.498.497.472.456.399.398.4
Alienware AW-Series AW3425DW Compare 98.38085.69290.697.995.395.7

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Overall (48.6)Gaming (29.6)Office (45.2)Creative (51.6)Portable (87.7)Professional (51.2)Entertainment (32.7)

Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.

Ähnliche Produkte