Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben — so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

1. Q4 202583/1005.0★9 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens's sharpness, color quality, and value for beginners, though some noted plastic build, chromatic aberration, and occasional autofocus quirks.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality highly rated, with creamy bokeh and vibrant colors.
   • 👍Great value for price, ideal as a beginner or multipurpose lens.
   • 🤔Build quality: plastic body not premium, but acceptable for the price point.
   • 🤔Some users noted chromatic aberration and occasional autofocus inconsistency.
2. Q3 202560/1004.7★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens for its compact size, low-light performance, and bokeh, but note plastic build, noisy autofocus, and crop sensor field-of-view considerations.

   • 👍Great low light f/1.8 aperture, sharp wide open, and buttery bokeh for portraits.
   • 🤔Autofocus is noisy for video but acceptable for stills; plastic build but lightweight.
   • 👎Autofocus could be faster in demanding moments; motor noise may affect video.
   • 🤔On crop sensor, 50mm gives 80mm equivalent field of view, not standard 50mm.
3. Q1 202590/1005.0★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens as a great budget option for portraits, daily snaps, and video, highlighting sharp images, smooth autofocus, and good compatibility with Sony cameras.

   • 👍Excellent for portraits and everyday photography
   • 👍Sharp images and good color reproduction
   • 👍Smooth autofocus and effective optical stabilization
   • 👍Good value for the price with versatile use
4. Q3 202387/1004.6★9 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens as sharp, fast-focusing, and a great value for portraits and everyday use, though some note the plastic build and lack of an MF/AF switch. One reviewer's identical lens failed, but they still bought it again.

   • 👍Sharp, fast autofocus, and good value for the price.
   • 🤔All-plastic build and no MF/AF switch are drawbacks.
   • 👍Effective stabilization and decent close-up focus for a non-macro lens.
   • 👎One reviewer's lens failed, requiring a replacement.
5. Q3 2022100/1005.0★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers in this period praised the lens as a sharp, affordable option for portraits. One reported purple fringing but still rated it 5 stars.

   • 👍Great value for the price, ideal for beginners and portraits.
   • 🤔One lens exhibited purple fringing, possibly a manufacturing defect.
   • 👍Sharp image quality, especially for portraits and general use.
   • 👎User reported purple fringing; requested manufacturer assistance.
6. Q4 202185/1005.0★7 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for its quality, versatility, and value, citing sharp bokeh, low-light performance, and compatibility. One reviewer criticized Sony's cashback policy.

   • 👍Lens quality praised: sharp, lightweight, durable, great for beginners and pros.
   • 👍Low-light capability valued: excellent with f/1.8 aperture for dark conditions.
   • 🤔One buyer threatened to boycott Sony due to a cashback dispute.
   • 👍Versatile for both photography and videography, including underwater use.
7. Q3 2021100/1005.0★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise this lens as affordable, sharp, and excellent for portraits and video, with some noting loud autofocus.

   • 👍Excellent value for the price, especially for beginners.
   • 👍Sharp image quality and lightweight, great for portraits.
   • 👍Good for cinematic video quality.
   • 👎Autofocus can be loud at times.
8. Q2 202189/1004.6★11 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens as a great value, sharp, and ideal for beginners. Some note autofocus limits and high price.

   • 👍Great value for the price, sharp images, and good for beginners.
   • 🤔Autofocus hunts a little and is not very fast in some situations.
   • 🤔Compact, lightweight design with decent stabilization; some find it pricey.
   • 👍Ideal portrait lens with good bokeh and low-light performance.
9. Q1 202182/1004.6★15 Bewertungen

   Buyers in Q1 2021 praise the lens as a great-value prime offering sharp images, good bokeh, and fast autofocus. Some note noisy autofocus, indoor crop limitations, and one reported a defective focus ring.

   • 👍Excellent value for money, sharp images with creamy bokeh.
   • 🤔Autofocus is fast and silent but noisy according to some users.
   • 👎50mm fixed focal length is cropped, making indoor use difficult.
   • 👎One buyer received a lens with a broken focus ring; customer service handled exchange.
10. Q4 202087/1004.7★9 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharp image quality, good value, and lightweight design, though some noted slow autofocus.

    • 👍Sharp, crisp image quality exceeded expectations for the price.
    • 👍Great value for money; many called it a must-have for Sony cameras.
    • 🤔Autofocus works well but is slower than expected in some reviews.
    • 👍Lens is lightweight and well-made, suitable for portraits and food photography.
11. Q3 202096/1004.9★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised this lens as affordable, lightweight, and excellent for portraits with great bokeh and sharpness.

    • 👍Great value for money with solid build and crisp image quality.
    • 👍Lightweight and compact design, easy to carry and handle.
    • 👍Excellent bokeh and low light performance for creative portraits.
    • 🤔Some prefer a 35mm over this lens for general use.
12. Q1 202084/1004.4★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, video OSS, and fast autofocus, but some noted a disappointing software bundle.

    • 👍Image quality and sharpness are excellent.
    • 👍OSS performs well for video; a favorite for videography.
    • 👍Fast autofocus and low F-stop make it great for portraits.
    • 🤔Included software package was low-end and disappointing to some.
13. Q4 201983/1004.6★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised value, image quality, and compact design. A few noted slower autofocus, noise, and red dots in some photos.

    • 👍Good value for money; budget-friendly lens with decent sharpness and contrast.
    • 🤔Autofocus is adequate but noisy, with occasional overshooting on some bodies.
    • 👎Some users observed red dot reflections not seen with kit lens.
    • 👍Lightweight, included hood, and solid overall build for the price.
14. Q3 201973/1004.3★15 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and value, but many noted slow autofocus, especially in low light.

    • 👍Sharp image quality and pleasing bokeh effects are consistently praised.
    • 👎Autofocus is slow and noisy, particularly in dim conditions, disappointing users.
    • 👍Excellent value for money; considered an affordable prime lens for beginners and hobbyists.
    • 🤔Some mention firmware update improves AF speed, but it remains a drawback for others.
15. Q2 201973/1004.3★16 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for sharp optics and value, but widely criticize slow, erratic autofocus and noise. A minority report confusion over focal length on APS-C bodies.

    • 👎Autofocus is slow, hunts, and is unreliable, especially in low light
    • 👍Excellent optical sharpness, color, bokeh, and build quality for the price
    • 🤔Great value budget prime, but AF performance is a major compromise
    • 👎AF motor is loud/noisy during operation
16. Q1 201990/1004.8★13 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised its sharpness, bokeh, and value for portraits on APS-C cameras, but noted occasional autofocus issues and noise.

    • 👍Excellent sharpness, bokeh, and image quality for portraits, often exceeding expectations for the price.
    • 👍Great value and build quality, especially for beginners upgrading from kit lenses on Sony a6000 series.
    • 🤔Autofocus can be fast and responsive but sometimes hunts or focuses on wrong subjects, with noticeable noise.
    • 👎Lens size considered large for a 50mm; price slightly higher than comparable Canon 50mm lens.
17. Q4 201890/1004.7★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for fast autofocus, low light performance, and compact size, with one noting OSS incompatibility with Sony FS5.

    • 👍Fast autofocus speed and overall image quality praised.
    • 👍Excellent low light and background blur performance highlighted.
    • 👍Lightweight and portable for travel and street photography.
    • 👎OSS not compatible with Sony FS5, awaiting firmware fix.
18. Q3 201885/1004.7★6 Bewertungen

    Most buyers in this period love the lens for its sharpness, bokeh, and value, though one noted slow auto focus.

    • 👍Great value for money and quality glass for portraits and low light.
    • 👍Sharp images and creamy bokeh with wide f/1.8 aperture.
    • 👍OSS is a plus for stabilization on Sony cameras.
    • 🤔Auto focus a little slow, but overall positive experience.
19. Q1 2018100/1005.0★7 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, bokeh, value, and macro capability, calling it a versatile upgrade for portraits and indoor use.

    • 👍Very sharp, especially at F4, with superb bokeh and color.
    • 👍Excellent value for the price, often called a bargain.
    • 👍Works well as a macro lens with manual focus at close distances.
    • 👍Great for indoor portraits and video bokeh effect.
20. Q3 201783/1004.9★7 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens for portraits, sharpness, bokeh, and low-light performance on Sony APS-C bodies. A few note sharpness isn't perfect wide open and criticize Sony's limited lens selection.

    • 👍Great for portraits with pleasing bokeh and sharp images.
    • 👍Fast and reliable autofocus even in low light.
    • 👍Excellent value with OSS stabilization, especially on A6000 series.
    • 👎Some find it not super sharp wide open; a few users lament Sony's sparse APS-C lens lineup.
21. Q2 201791/1004.9★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens for its sharpness, value, and quick autofocus, though some note slow focusing for candid shots.

    • 👍Sharp image quality and great value across multiple reviews.
    • 👍Quick autofocus and smooth manual focus, especially with a6500.
    • 👎Slow to focus for a prime, limiting use in candid/street photography.
    • 👍Well-packaged delivery with bundle extras exceeding expectations.

Basierend auf 230 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.