ASUS TUF Gaming F16, Core i7-14650HX, 64GB, 1TB SSD, Gris
CPU Intel Core i7-14650HX
RAM 64 GB
Storage 1 TB
Screen 16"
GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
OS Windows 11 Pro
Weight 3.1 kg
25 Gesamtbewertung
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong ram (96th percentile) 96th
- Strong gpu (93rd percentile) 93rd
- Strong cpu (88th percentile) 88th
- Strong storage (65th percentile) 65th
Nachteile
- Below average portability (8th percentile)
- Below average port selection (10th percentile)
- Below average affordability (29th percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Processor
| Cores | 16 |
Graphics
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 |
| VRAM | 8 GB |
Memory & Storage
| RAM | 64 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 |
| Storage | 1 TB |
| Storage Type | SSD |
Display
| Size | 16" |
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| Color Gamut | 100% sRGB |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E |
Physical
| Weight | 3.1 kg / 6.9 lbs |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 | MSI Raider RAIDERGE6814247 | HP OmniBook X Flip | Acer Predator Helios Neo PHN16S-71-98RF | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP964XHA-KG2US |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core i7-14650HX | Intel Core Ultra 7 165H | Intel Core i9 14900HX | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | Intel Core 7 240H | Intel Core Ultra 7 258V |
| RAM (GB) | 64 | 64 | 32 | 24 | 32 | 32 |
| Storage (GB) | 1024 | 2048 | 2048 | 1024 | 1024 | 1024 |
| Screen | 16" | 16" 3840x2400 | 16" 3840x2160 | 14" 1920x1200 | 16" 2560x1600 | 16" 2880x1800 |
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | AMD Radeon 860M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | Intel Arc Graphics 140V |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro |
| Weight (kg) | 3.1 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| Battery (Wh) | - | 90 | 100 | 59 | - | 76 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | CPU | GPU | RAM | Anschlüsse | Display | Mobilität | Speicher | Zuverlässigkeit | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS TUF Gaming F16 | 88.3 | 92.6 | 95.7 | 10.1 | 61.6 | 8.4 | 65.2 | 60.4 | 28.5 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 Compare | 82 | 84.5 | 98.9 | 85.5 | 98.6 | 25.6 | 93.9 | 81.7 | 2.7 |
| MSI Raider RAIDERGE6814247 Compare | 93.2 | 94.5 | 86.4 | 98.5 | 98 | 9.2 | 93.9 | 60.4 | 10.3 |
| HP OmniBook X Flip Compare | 80.3 | 63.8 | 82.4 | 77.4 | 74.1 | 79.5 | 65.2 | 33.4 | 43.5 |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo PHN16S-71-98RF Compare | 93.2 | 94.5 | 89.1 | 97.3 | 92 | 42.4 | 79.3 | 10.7 | 14.3 |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP964XHA-KG2US Compare | 66.1 | 68.9 | 79.6 | 83.4 | 91.6 | 33.1 | 79.3 | 81.7 | 22.6 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wir verfolgen die Preise für dieses Produkt seit dem 6. Nov. 2026. Das Diagramm erscheint, sobald mehr Daten vorliegen.
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt25.2
- AI/LLM26.3
- Gaming10.7
- Mobilität15.5
- Kreative17.6
- Studium23.9
- Business23
- Entwicklung33.3
- Entertainment27.4
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
Weitere Konfigurationen9
TUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core i5 13450HX16GB512GBJaeger Gray26.460 MX$TUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core i7 14650HX32GB1TBJaeger Gray47.225 MX$TUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core i7 14650HX32GB1TBBlack52.799 MX$TUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core i7 14650HX32GB2TBJaeger GrayTUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core i7 14650HX64GB2TBGrayTUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core i7 14650HX16GB1TBGrayTUF Gaming 15.6" F1615.6"Intel Core i5 13450HX32GB1TBBlackTUF Gaming 15.6" F1615.6"Intel Core i5 13450HX32GB2TBBlackTUF Gaming F1616"Intel Core 5 210H16GB512GBBlack
