Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
GPU Quadro NVS 510
VRAM 2GB GDDR6
Boost Clock 2156 MHz
TDP 35 W
Memory Bus 384 bit
Class workstation
25 Gesamtbewertung
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong affordability (94th percentile) 94th
- Strong social proof (71st percentile) 71st
- Strong compute (66th percentile) 66th
Nachteile
- Below average raster (9th percentile)
- Below average feature (12th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (13th percentile)
- Below average vram (15th percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Quadro NVS 510 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 |
| Class | workstation |
| Process | 5 |
Memory
| VRAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 384 |
| Bandwidth | 504 |
Compute
| RT Cores | 54 |
| Base Clock | 1327 |
| Boost Clock | 2156 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.3 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.65 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 677 |
| GPU Compute | 314 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 35 |
| Recommended PSU | 450 |
| Cooler | Fan |
Connectivity
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
Physical
| Form Factor | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | No |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Quadro NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 2GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2156 | 2407 | 2482 | 2805 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 35 | 575 | 300 | 360 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 384 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | 21.1 | 18.8 | 15.4 | 8.8 | 66.1 | 11.6 | 17.8 | 12.8 | 24.4 | 71.2 | 94.2 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.7 | 90 | 97.4 | 98.6 | 97.4 | 96.4 | 72.8 | 26.8 | 99.2 | 99.1 | 3.4 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79 | 92.1 | 85.3 | 88.4 | 87.8 | 96.4 | 91.5 | 73.4 | 94.1 | 88.9 | 20.7 |
| Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD Compare | 85 | 95.2 | 88.5 | 94.1 | 93.1 | 96.4 | 91.5 | 58.9 | 94.1 | 88.9 | 15.5 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85 | 97.5 | 88.5 | 94.1 | 93.1 | 96.4 | 91.5 | 58.9 | 94.1 | 99.1 | 19.7 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.7 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 83.6 | 95.4 | 84.4 | 91.5 | 54.5 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 15.2 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
