Intel Xeon E5320 4-core LGA 6

The 1.86 GHz base clock and 1066 MHz bus speed define this Xeon E5320, a 4-core server processor with 8MB of L2 cache and a 5/5 customer rating. Its 77.1/100 productivity score and 76.9/100 server score make it a solid choice for legacy server workloads, though gaming performance trails at 29.9/100. Best for IT professionals maintaining older dual-socket servers or upgrading existing LGA 6 platforms where ECC memory support and stable multi-threaded throughput matter more than raw clock speed.

Cores 4
Threads 52
Boost Clock 3400 MHz
L3 Cache 39 MB
TDP 185 W
Socket LGA 6
Intel Xeon E5320 4-core LGA 6 cpu
64 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

The 30-Second Version

The Intel Xeon E5320 is a 2006-era server chip that's still floating around the used market. It's fine for legacy server repairs or retro builds, but terrible for gaming and inefficient for modern workloads. At $150 USD or EUR 241+, you're paying for nostalgia, not performance.

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • Dirt cheap on the used market 92nd
  • 8MB L2 cache was huge for its era 89th
  • ECC memory support for basic server duty 78th
  • Low idle power draw compared to dual-socket alternatives 77th
  • Easy to find on eBay and Amazon

Nachteile

  • Gaming performance is basically unusable
  • 185W TDP for very little modern performance
  • Requires old LGA 771 boards and DDR2 RAM
  • No PCIe 4.0, no modern instruction sets
  • Spec listings are often wrong or misleading

Die Fakten

Performance

Let's talk numbers. PassMark shows 37,558 multi-thread and 1,826 single-thread. Those are respectable scores for a chip this old, but context matters. The multi-thread score lands in the 89th percentile of our database, which sounds great until you realize we're comparing it against other ancient server chips, not modern desktop CPUs. A Ryzen 7 9800X3D will absolutely demolish this thing in every workload.

Single-thread sits at the 47th percentile, which is about average for its class. That means basic tasks like file serving or light virtualization won't feel terrible, but anything latency-sensitive will crawl. The 1.86GHz base clock and 1066MHz FSB are the bottlenecks. DDR2 memory bandwidth is another choke point. This chip was designed for 2006-era workloads, and it shows.

Performance Percentiles

AI 92.3
Feature 46.7
Platform 78.4
Efficiency 77.3
Multi Thread 89.2
Nutzerresonanz 36.4
Single Thread 47.2

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Xeon
Model E5320
Codename Ice Lake-SP
Class server
Process 10

Cores & Clocks

Cores 4
P-cores 26
Threads 52
Base Clock 1860
Boost Clock 3400

Cache

L2 Cache 8
L3 Cache 39 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 37558
PassMark Single 1826

Memory

Memory Type DDR4
Max Speed 2993
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket LGA 6
PCIe 4
PCIe Lanes 64
TDP 185
Unlocked No

vs Competition

Against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, this isn't even a contest. The 9800X3D is a modern gaming monster with 3D V-Cache. The E5320 is a museum piece. Different planets. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is a more interesting comparison. That's a Sandy Bridge-EP chip from 2013, still old but way more capable. It has higher clocks, better IPC, and supports DDR3. If you need a cheap server chip, the E5-2637 V2 is the smarter buy. The be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 5 isn't even a CPU, it's a cooler, so that's a weird competitor in our database. And the DAKboard CPU v4 is a niche ARM thing for digital signage. None of these are direct rivals, which tells you how odd this product category is.

If you're cross-shopping, the real question is: do you need LGA 771 compatibility? If yes, the E5320 is one of the few options. If no, buy literally anything newer.

Spec Intel Xeon E5320 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 Expert X6AIR
Cores 4 8 16 - - -
Threads 52 16 32 - - -
Boost Clock Mhz 3400 5200 3900 - - -
L3 Cache Mb 39 96 37.5 - - -
Tdp W 185 120 195 - - -
Socket LGA 6 AM5 LGA 4677 AM5 AM5 BGA
Integrated Graphics - AMD Radeon Graphics No - - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti ThreadNutzerresonanzSingle Thread
Intel Xeon E5320 92.346.778.477.389.236.447.2
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.498.595.287.89096.595.7
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare 91.877.190.778.290.8080.6
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi Compare 3.920.4914.44.490.43.6
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 Compare 3.920.417.94.44.496.53.6
Expert X6AIR Compare 3.920.417.94.44.470.815.7

Preis

Value & Pricing

Value is where this gets tricky. At $150 USD in the US, you're paying a premium for a chip that's nearly two decades old. The European spread is even weirder, EUR 241 to EUR 267 across three listings. That's a EUR 26 gap for the same silicon. If you're in Germany, France, or Italy, shop around. The cheapest listing is your friend here. But honestly, for that money you could grab a used Ryzen 5 or an older Xeon E5 that runs circles around this thing. The only reason to buy an E5320 is if you have a specific legacy server board that needs it, or you're building a period-correct retro rig.

Ab 4.755 MX$ 1 Angebot bei 1 Händler
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 4.755 MX$

Price History

4.500 MX$ 4.600 MX$ 4.700 MX$ 4.800 MX$ 13. Juni8. Nov. 4.755 MX$

Mehr erfahren

Overview

The Intel Xeon E5320 is a weird one. It's a server chip from the Core 2 era, sitting in that odd space where old enterprise hardware gets resold for cheap and people wonder if it's still useful. The listing calls it a 1.86GHz quad-core with 8MB of L2 cache and a 1066MHz front side bus. Our database has it pegged at 4 cores and 52 threads, which is... not right. That thread count belongs to a much newer Ice Lake-SP chip, not this old Clovertown-based Xeon. The specs are a mess, but the actual chip is a real, if ancient, piece of silicon.

So what do people actually search for here? "Is the Xeon E5320 good for gaming?" No. Absolutely not. Our gaming score puts it at 29.9 out of 100, which is one of the worst we've seen. "Is it good for a home server?" That's more interesting. The server score is 76.9, which sounds decent until you remember this thing sips power at 185W TDP and needs DDR2-era infrastructure. You're not dropping this into a modern board.

At around $150 USD on the used market, or EUR 241 to EUR 267 in Europe, you're paying for nostalgia or a very specific legacy server need. Not for performance.

Common Questions

Q: Is the Intel Xeon E5320 good for gaming?

No. Our gaming score for the Xeon E5320 is 29.9 out of 100, which is one of the worst we've seen. The low clock speed, old architecture, and DDR2 memory make it unusable for modern games.

Q: Can I use the Xeon E5320 in a regular desktop motherboard?

No. The E5320 uses Socket LGA 771, which is a server socket from the mid-2000s. You'll need a compatible server board, not a standard desktop motherboard.

Q: How much power does the Xeon E5320 use?

The Xeon E5320 has a 185W TDP, which is very high for a quad-core chip. That's more power draw than many modern 8-core desktop CPUs.

Q: Is the Xeon E5320 good for a home server?

It can work for basic file serving or light virtualization, but there are much better options. Used Xeon E5 chips or even old Ryzen CPUs offer better performance per watt and are easier to find parts for.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you're building a gaming PC, a modern home server, or anything that needs to run current software. The E5320 lacks modern instruction sets, PCIe 4.0, and any meaningful single-thread performance. If you want a cheap server chip, grab a used Xeon E5-2600 series or a Ryzen 5 3600. Both are faster, more efficient, and have actual upgrade paths. This chip is for collectors and people stuck with legacy LGA 771 hardware, not for anyone buying their first server.

Verdict

Should you buy the Intel Xeon E5320? Only if you have a very specific reason. Maybe you're repairing an old server, or you want a period-accurate chip for a retro build. For general use, home servers, or anything resembling modern computing, this chip is a bad idea. The performance per watt is terrible, the platform is dead, and the price isn't even that low when you factor in the cost of finding compatible parts.

If you need a cheap server CPU, look at used Xeon E5 or even old Ryzen chips. They're faster, more efficient, and easier to find boards for. The E5320 is a collector's item, not a daily driver.

Usage Scores

Gesamt (64)AI/LLM (67.4)Budget (40.4)Gaming (29.8)Server (77.1)Efficiency (34.5)Productivity (77.1)

Ähnliche Produkte