Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 4-core LGA 775

★★★★★ 4.6 (39)

The 105W TDP and 8MB L2 cache on a 2.66 GHz quad-core design provided tangible multitasking headroom for its era, far outpacing dual-core alternatives. Its Socket 775 compatibility and Intel Virtualization Technology made it a drop-in upgrade for aging business desktops needing to run legacy virtual machines. This processor is best for IT refurbishers or hobbyists maintaining period-correct Windows XP and early Windows 7 systems for retro productivity.

Cores 4
Threads 8
Boost Clock 4000 MHz
L3 Cache 8 MB
TDP 105 W
Socket LGA 775
Integrated Graphics HD Graphics 530
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 4-core LGA 775 cpu
45 Gesamtbewertung

Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis

Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

The 30-Second Version

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is a 2007 quad-core that still works but shows its age everywhere. Best score is budget at 59.3, and that's mostly because used prices are rock bottom. Only worth grabbing if you're building a retro rig or testing an old LGA 775 board.

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • Dirt cheap on the used market, often under $20 70th
  • 8MB L2 cache was huge for its era and still helps with older software
  • Socket 775 boards are everywhere in thrift stores and basements
  • Runs Windows XP and 7 era software without breaking a sweat

Nachteile

  • 105W TDP is terrible for the performance you get
  • DDR3 memory support only, and slow DDR3 at that
  • No modern instruction sets, so some current software won't even launch
  • The iGPU mention in the specs is wrong, this chip has no integrated graphics

Was Besitzer sagen

The Word on the Street

4.6/5 (39 reviews)
👍 Several owners mention these chips still run stable after years of use and work great for retro gaming builds
🤔 A common theme is that the Q6700 handles basic tasks fine but struggles with modern web browsing and video playback
👎 Some buyers report that the 105W TDP makes cooling a challenge in older cases with limited airflow

Die Fakten

Performance

The Q6700 sits at the 65th percentile for single thread and 55th for multi thread in our database. That sounds okay until you remember the comparison pool includes a lot of very old silicon. The 2.66GHz clock and 1066MHz front side bus were respectable in the Core 2 era, but modern workloads will choke on this thing. The 105W TDP is also rough for what you get. Efficiency lands at the 48th percentile, which means it drinks power like a much newer chip while delivering a fraction of the output. The 8MB L2 cache is the one spec that still sounds impressive, and it does help with older games and basic multitasking. But don't expect miracles.

Performance Percentiles

AI 55.1
Feature 54.9
Platform 54
Efficiency 48.2
Multi Thread 55.3
Nutzerresonanz 70.3
Affordability 63.8
Single Thread 64.5

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Core 2 Quad
Model Q6700
Codename Skylake
Class desktop
Process 14

Cores & Clocks

Cores 4
P-cores 4
Threads 8
Base Clock 2660
Boost Clock 4000

Cache

L2 Cache 8
L3 Cache 8 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 8032
PassMark Single 2274

Memory

Memory Type DDR3, DDR4
Max Speed 2133
Max Memory 64
ECC No

Platform & Power

Socket LGA 775
PCIe 3
PCIe Lanes 16
TDP 105
Unlocked No

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics HD Graphics 530

vs Competition

Stacking this against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D or the EPYC 9555P is almost comical. Those chips are in a different universe. The 9800X3D will run circles around the Q6700 in every possible metric, and the EPYC is a server monster with dozens of cores. Even the Dell Inspiron 7700, which is a whole prebuilt system, makes more sense for most people. The only reason to pick the Q6700 over any of these is if you're restoring a period-correct Windows XP gaming rig or you found a free motherboard and just need a chip to test it. The Core i9 BX80673I99940X is also ancient by modern standards, but it at least has more cores and threads to throw at the problem.

Spec Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 SMC EPYC 9555P D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21
Cores 4 8 32 64 18 16
Threads 8 16 64 128 36 32
Boost Clock Mhz 4000 5200 3500 4400 4400 3900
L3 Cache Mb 8 96 256 256 24.75 37.5
Tdp W 105 120 200 360 165 195
Socket LGA 775 AM5 Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) AMD Socket SP5 LGA2066 LGA 4677
Integrated Graphics HD Graphics 530 AMD Radeon Graphics No - - No
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti ThreadNutzerresonanzAffordabilitySingle Thread
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 55.154.95448.255.370.363.864.5
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.398.595.288.188.796.523.694.7
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare 99.190.976.497.499.1088.488.7
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.196.888.999.400.485.2
D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Compare 97.362.682.599.499.872.47.795.7
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare 91.877.190.778.189.402.779.7

Preis

Value & Pricing

There's no listed price in USD, but the one Japanese listing sits at 31,104 JPY. On the used market in the States, these go for pocket change. If you can grab one for under twenty bucks and you already have a working LGA 775 board, it's a fun project. But spending real money on this in 2025 is a mistake. The affordability score of 64th percentile reflects the low used prices, not the actual value proposition. You're buying nostalgia, not performance.

Mehr erfahren

Overview

The Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 is a relic from 2007 that somehow still has a pulse on the used market. Four cores, 8MB of L2 cache, and a 2.66GHz clock on the ancient LGA 775 socket. It was a beast in its day. That day was roughly seventeen years ago.

We're looking at this through a 2025 lens, and the scores tell the story. Budget use gets a 59.3, productivity scrapes by at 48.4, and the overall score lands at 44.4. This chip is for tinkerers, retro builders, and people trying to squeeze life out of an old Dell. Not for anyone who needs actual performance.

Common Questions

Q: Can the Q6700 run Windows 10 or 11?

Windows 10 will run, but it won't be snappy. Windows 11 officially requires newer CPUs, so you'd need workarounds that aren't worth the hassle on this chip.

Q: Is this CPU good for gaming in 2025?

Only for retro games from the 2000s and early 2010s. Modern titles will either refuse to launch or run at unplayable frame rates.

Q: What kind of motherboard do I need?

Any Socket LGA 775 board with a BIOS that supports the Q6700. Check the board's CPU support list before buying, since not all 775 boards got the microcode update for this chip.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you need a daily driver for anything beyond word processing and light web use. The lack of modern instruction sets means some current software won't even install. If you want a cheap used CPU for a budget build, grab a used Ryzen 5 or an 8th gen Intel i5 instead. You'll spend a bit more but get exponentially better performance and efficiency.

Verdict

The Q6700 is for retro enthusiasts and people who need a cheap chip to test an old Socket 775 board. That's it. If you're building a machine for daily use, even for basic web browsing and email, look at a used Ryzen or an older i5 instead. The Q6700 will technically run a modern OS, but it won't be a good time. Buy it for the nostalgia, not the performance.

Usage Scores

Gesamt (44.5)AI/LLM (38.7)Budget (59.4)Gaming (43.7)Server (35.4)Efficiency (43.2)Productivity (48.5)

Ähnliche Produkte