Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SA

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SA

Gigabyte
86 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ASUS XG27WCMS

ASUS XG27WCMS

ASUS
77 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Gigabyte
87
ASUS
76
Office
Gigabyte
85
ASUS
74
Professional
Gigabyte
83
ASUS
58
Creative
Gigabyte
81
ASUS
57
Entertainment
Gigabyte
80
ASUS
69
Portable
Gigabyte
15
ASUS
13

Spezifikationen

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SAASUS XG27WCMS
Display
Size32"27"
Resolution3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Panel TypeOLEDVA
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Curvature1,500
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz280 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms1 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProFreeSync Premium
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits300 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P395% DCI-P3, 125% sRGB
Color Depth10bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR
HDR SupportHDRHDR10
Connectivity
HDMI Ports21
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight8.53 kg7.21 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SA

  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

ASUS XG27WCMS

  • Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong performance (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (78th percentile)
  • Strong color (73rd percentile)

Preise

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SA

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SA

Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 SA Besser bei:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen