Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Sony
68 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Canon
89
Sony
82
Budget
Canon
80
Sony
78
Professional
Canon
80
Sony
77
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Sony
71
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Sony
74
Travel
Canon
73
Sony
68
Macro
Canon
65
Sony
61
Street
Canon
64
Sony
65
Portrait
Canon
54
Sony
56

Spezifikationen

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMSony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min15 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm35 mm
Elements1615
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements35
ED Elements22
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.68 kg
Filter Thread82 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMXD Linear Motors
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm280 mm
Max Magnification0.21x0.32x

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports