Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C
Elite Brands Inc
34 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Sony
74 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Landscape
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Macro
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 9 |
| Groups | 12 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | Ultra Multi-Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T32 | f/5.6 |
| Min Aperture | T3.1 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.73 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 305 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:1★ | 0.215x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong optical (76th percentile)
- Strong macro (68th percentile)
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Preise
Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C0.003Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II0.023Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II bietet 7.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Elite Brands Inc DS100M-C
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
