Yeston Radeon RX 9060 XT ACE OC 16GB GDDR6
Equipped with 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus and RDNA 4 architecture, this card delivers solid 4K gaming capability with a 2520MHz boost clock. A dual-BIOS switch lets you toggle between standard and higher 2210-2700MHz variable frequencies, while the triple-fan cooler manages its 220W TDP. This GPU is best for budget-conscious 4K gamers who prioritize frame rates over content creation workloads.
暂无零售商最新价格
概览
The 30-Second Version
The Yeston RX 9060 XT ACE has 16GB of VRAM and PCIe 5.0, but raster performance is mid and user sentiment is at the 6th percentile. Warranty and support details are missing, which is a big red flag at $489. Unless you love the Yeston look and don't mind risk, skip it.
Pros & Cons
优点
- 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus is a real selling point 82nd
- PCIe 5.0 x16 support keeps it future-proof 82nd
- Dual BIOS switch gives you some tuning flexibility 79th
- ARGB lighting and a triple fan cooler look the part 76th
缺点
- User sentiment is at the 6th percentile, buyers are not confident
- Raster performance is middle of the pack at best
- Warranty and support details are basically nonexistent
- Nearly three slots thick and 332mm long, check your case
用户评价
The Word on the Street
用户口碑如何随时间变化
独家依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。
实测数据
Performance
The RX 9060 XT ACE puts up a PassMark G3D score of 19749, which lands it in the 47th percentile for raster performance. That's not bad, but it's not exciting either. Compute is a bit stronger at the 79th percentile, and AI workloads hit the 82nd percentile, so this card has some legs outside of pure gaming. The 16GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus is a genuine highlight, giving it 645 GB/s of bandwidth, which helps at higher resolutions. Ray tracing sits at the 49th percentile, so don't expect to crank RT settings and keep frame rates high. Power draw is 220W TDP with a 550W PSU recommendation and two 8-pin connectors, which is reasonable for this class but not exactly efficient. Efficiency lands at the 49th percentile, so it's average there too. The dual BIOS switch with STD and VAR modes is a nice touch for tinkerers, but the default STD mode runs at 2070-2520MHz, which is conservative.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 9060 XT |
| Brand | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 4 |
| Class | consumer |
| Process | 4 |
Memory
| VRAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 256 |
| Bandwidth | 644.6 |
Compute
| Stream Processors | 3584 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 |
| RT Cores | 56 |
| Base Clock | 2070 |
| Boost Clock | 2520 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 72.25 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 36.13 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 19749 |
| GPU Compute | 14794 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 220 |
| Recommended PSU | 550 |
| Power Connectors | 2 x 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Triple Fan |
| Fans | 3 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 332 |
| Slot Width | 2.9 |
| Form Factor | Full Height |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| AV1 Encode | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 |
| RGB | Yes |
vs Competition
Stacked against the MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti, the Yeston card gives up a lot of raw gaming performance. The Ventus is a known quantity with better raster and RT scores in our database. The Gigabyte AERO RTX 5070 Ti is another strong alternative, especially if you care about build quality and cooling. The Sapphire NITRO+ is the AMD side's premium option and has a much stronger reputation for support and thermals. The Yeston ACE has the 16GB VRAM advantage over some budget cards, but it doesn't beat the 5070 Ti class cards where it matters most. If you want AMD and you want reliability, the Sapphire is the safer bet. The Yeston is more of a wildcard.
| Spec | Yeston Radeon RX 9060 XT ACE OC | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Radeon RX 9060 XT | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 16GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2520 | 2407 | 2482 | 2805 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 220 | 575 | 300 | 360 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 256 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 产品 | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Connectivity | 用户口碑 | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeston Radeon RX 9060 XT ACE OC | 81.6 | 48.5 | 75.7 | 46.8 | 79 | 58.1 | 72.6 | 5.9 | 48.7 | 81.9 | 42 | 56.5 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.6 | 86.2 | 24.9 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.3 | 92.1 | 85.6 | 88.7 | 88 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 80.7 | 73 | 94 | 88.8 | 20.8 |
| Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD Compare | 85.2 | 95.1 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.2 | 57.9 | 94 | 88.8 | 15.9 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.2 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 99.4 | 57.9 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.8 | 96.1 | 91.7 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 86.2 | 52.7 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 17.9 |
价格
Value & Pricing
At $489 USD, this card is in a strange spot. The 16GB of VRAM and PCIe 5.0 support are nice, but the raster performance doesn't justify the price when you look at what else is out there. The affordability score is only at the 56th percentile, so it's not a screaming deal. And when user sentiment is at the 6th percentile, you have to wonder what early buyers are running into. The lack of warranty info alone makes this a risky purchase. If you're spending nearly five hundred bucks on a GPU, you want to know the company will back it up. Right now, that's a big unknown.
我们自 2026年7月4日 起追踪该产品的价格。数据增多后将显示图表。
了解更多
Overview
The Yeston Radeon RX 9060 XT ACE is a weird one. On paper it's a 16GB RDNA 4 card with a 256-bit bus and 645 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which sounds great. But our database puts its raster performance at the 47th percentile, basically middle of the pack, and user sentiment is sitting at the 6th percentile. That's a red flag the size of the card itself, which is 332mm long and nearly three slots thick.
Yeston is known for flashy designs and this ACE model leans into that with ARGB lighting and a triple fan cooler. The spec sheet is solid enough, 3584 shaders, 2520MHz boost, AV1 encode, PCIe 5.0 x16. But the real story here is the gap between what the hardware promises and what buyers actually know about it. Warranty details, real world benchmarks, and RGB customization info are all thin. That's a problem for a card at this price point.
Common Questions
Q: What power supply do I need for the Yeston RX 9060 XT ACE?
You'll need at least a 550W PSU with two 8-pin PCIe power connectors. The card itself draws 220W TDP.
Q: Will this card fit in my case?
It's 332mm long and takes up about 2.9 slots, so measure carefully. Smaller mid-tower cases might struggle with the length.
Q: Does the Yeston RX 9060 XT support ray tracing?
Yes, it has 56 RT cores and supports ray tracing, but our data puts RT performance at the 49th percentile. Don't expect to max out RT settings at high frame rates.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you want a card with proven reliability and solid warranty support. The user sentiment score is at the 6th percentile, and Yeston hasn't provided clear warranty details. If you need strong 1080p gaming performance, the raster score of 52.8 out of 100 for gaming at that resolution is underwhelming. And if your case is on the smaller side, the 332mm length and nearly three slot thickness will be a problem. Look at Sapphire or MSI instead.
Verdict
This card is for a specific kind of buyer. Someone who wants 16GB of VRAM, likes the Yeston aesthetic, and is willing to roll the dice on support and real world performance. The hardware itself is fine, but the lack of warranty info and the terrible user sentiment score make it hard to recommend to most people. If you're building a gaming PC and want a card that just works, look elsewhere. If you're a collector or someone who likes unusual hardware and doesn't mind some risk, the ACE might be interesting. For everyone else, there are safer options at this price.
Usage Scores
- 总体54
- AI/LLM58.9
- Budget66.9
- Gaming 4k55.4
- Ray Tracing54.5
- Workstation55.8
- Gaming 1080p52.8
- Gaming 1440p53.1
- Content Creation62.4