BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming Q5-417Z1 Ryzen 5700X 2025
CPU AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
RAM 16 GB
Storage 1 TB
GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
form factor mid-tower
OS Windows 11 Pro
45 综合评分
价格 JP¥0
概览
优缺点
优点
- Strong gpu (73rd percentile) 73rd
- Strong storage (73rd percentile) 73rd
缺点
- Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)
- Below average reliability (12th percentile)
- Below average social proof (19th percentile)
- Below average ram (31st percentile)
用户评价
用户口碑如何随时间变化
独家依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。
用户口碑随时间不断改善
25/100我们的 AI 口碑分析
基于 5 条带日期的客户评价，按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。
实测数据
性能表现
规格参数
完整规格参数
Processor
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Cores | 8 |
| Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB |
Graphics
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 |
| Type | Discrete |
| VRAM | 8 GB |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 |
Memory & Storage
| RAM | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR4 |
| Storage | 1 TB |
| Storage Type | NVMe SSD |
Build
| Form Factor | mid-tower |
| Weight | 9.8 kg / 21.5 lbs |
Connectivity
| USB Ports | 9 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 |
System
| OS | Windows 11 Pro |
竞品对比
| Spec | BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming Q5-417Z1 | HP OMEN GT22-3080 | Lenovo Legion 90Y6003JUS | Dell Tower Plus EBT2250 | ASUS Republic of Gamers GM700TZ-BS978 | Apple Mac Studio M4 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | Intel Core Ultra 9 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X | Apple M4 Max |
| RAM (GB) | 16 | 32 | 64 | 32 | 64 | 36 |
| Storage (GB) | 1024 | 2048 | 3072 | 3000 | 2048 | 512 |
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 | AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT | Apple M4 Max 32-core |
| Form Factor | mid-tower | mid-tower | mid-tower | mid-tower | desktop | sff |
| Psu W | - | 850 | 1200 | 460 | 850 | - |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home | macOS |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 产品 | CPU | GPU | RAM | 接口 | 存储 | User Sentiment | 可靠性 | 用户口碑 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming Q5-417Z1 | 60.9 | 73.2 | 31.4 | 51.1 | 73.1 | 0.9 | 11.8 | 19 |
| HP OMEN GT22-3080 Compare | 96 | 89 | 78.8 | 93.3 | 91.6 | 75.8 | 70.6 | 87.2 |
| Lenovo Legion 90Y6003JUS Compare | 97.5 | 89 | 96.4 | 91.8 | 96.4 | 0 | 70.6 | 84.1 |
| Dell Tower Plus EBT2250 Compare | 89.6 | 73.2 | 78.8 | 97 | 95.7 | 0 | 70.6 | 99.1 |
| ASUS Republic of Gamers GM700TZ-BS978 Compare | 98.8 | 79.6 | 93.9 | 97.3 | 91.6 | 98.3 | 38 | 74.2 |
| Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Compare | 85.6 | 66.7 | 69.4 | 94.5 | 31.7 | 88.7 | 99.3 | 99.9 |
价格
性价比分析
我们自 2026年5月29日 起追踪该产品的价格。数据增多后将显示图表。
使用场景评分
完整评测即将发布。上方的规格、评分、价格和图表始终保持最新。
