Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III Black 2018

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

1. Q3 202372/1003 条评价

   Buyers praised image quality, size, and stabilization, but noted menu navigation issues with bright green highlights and AF tracking limitations for fast action.

   • 👍Good image quality, perfect body size, and easy navigation overall.
   • 👍Lightweight with stabilization and internal stacking, ideal for street photography.
   • 🤔Menu highlights in bright green are hard to see in bright light, but livable.
   • 👎AF tracking couldn't keep up with speeding race cars; zone focusing needed.
2. Q2 202388/1004 条评价

   Buyers praised the camera's image stabilization, image quality, and portability. One noted the build feels less premium than the Mark II but still nice, while others found controls intuitive and the camera easy to use.

   • 👍In-body stabilization delivers crisp images, even for long handheld exposures.
   • 👍Image quality and compact size are highlights, with one buyer enjoying both.
   • 👍Controls are fast and intuitive once mastered; camera is easy to use.
   • 🤔Build feels less premium than the Mark II but still nice to hold and use.
3. Q3 202233/1002.7★3 条评价

   Buyers praise image quality and compactness but report reliability issues like shutter failure and baseplate cracking, plus poor manuals and menus. Trust in the brand has diminished.

   • 👎Shutter/IS failure after 13 months, costly repair; baseplate cracks around tripod socket, not covered by warranty.
   • 🤔Excellent image quality and compact size, but reliability concerns and poor customer service response to defects.
   • 👎Poor manual and confusing menus; some settings require multiple menu sections, and custom modes are hard to access.
   • 👎Downgrades from previous models: micro USB instead of USB-C, no settings save/restore in Workspace, no tethering in Capture.
4. Q2 202262/1004.0★6 条评价

   Buyers praise the light weight, ergonomics, and IBIS, but note missing features like webcam streaming and hard copy manual, plus a few zero-star reviews that are actually positive.

   • 👍Light weight and compact size praised as ideal for travel and daily use.
   • 👍IBIS superior to competitors, enabling handheld shots down to 2 seconds.
   • 👎Cannot stream video for web conferencing, unlike the Mark II.
   • 🤔No hard copy manual and missing eyecup disappoint some buyers.
5. Q4 202195/1005.0★6 条评价

   Buyers praised the camera's light weight, compact size, image quality, and advanced features like bracketing and raw shooting. Some noted a learning curve and sparse manual, but overall satisfaction was high.

   • 👍Lightweight and compact design praised by multiple buyers, ideal for travel and replacing heavier DSLRs.
   • 👍Image quality and enlargement capability up to 20x24 crops satisfied a former pro photographer.
   • 👍Advanced features like bracketing, sequential shooting, raw/jpeg, and sophisticated focusing were valued.
   • 🤔Manual is basic; buyers needed online resources or planned to buy a book, indicating a learning curve.
6. Q3 202183/1004.5★6 条评价

   Buyers praised the camera's compact size, light weight, image quality, and suitability for travel and wildlife. One reported a defective unit and had to pay return shipping.

   • 👍Compact and lightweight design praised as ideal for travel and walk-around use.
   • 👍Excellent image quality, including low-light and wildlife shots, with great stabilization.
   • 👎One defective unit received; buyer had to pay return shipping, raising quality concerns.
   • 👍Solid build with dust and splash proofing, suitable for damp conditions.
7. Q2 202167/1004.1★9 条评价

   Buyers praised the camera's compact size, image quality, and controls, but some reported defects: a cracked tripod mount and a defective kit lens. Overall, sentiment is positive but tempered by these reliability issues.

   • 👍Compact, lightweight body ideal for travel and hiking; users appreciate the portability and image quality.
   • 👎Tripod mount flexes and can crack, causing instability with heavier lenses; a notable design flaw.
   • 👎One kit lens (12-45 Pro) was defective out of the box, showing a 'check lens' error and focus issues.
   • 👍Excellent controls, dials, and build quality; 4K video and stabilizer are praised.
8. Q1 2021100/1005.0★5 条评价

   All five reviewers in Q1 2021 praised the camera's compact size, image stabilization, and image quality, recommending it for travel and outdoor use.

   • 👍Compact and lightweight design praised as ideal for travel and hiking, easy to carry.
   • 👍Image stabilization (IBIS) highlighted as impressive, aiding sharp photos and low-light shots.
   • 👍Image quality, especially JPEGs and low-light performance, exceeded expectations.
   • 👍Ease of use and abundant features appreciated, suitable for various skill levels.
9. Q4 202072/1004.5★6 条评价

   Buyers praised the camera's size, image quality, autofocus, stabilization, and value, especially for video. Some noted a less solid body and plasticky kit lens, while one reviewer gave a low rating despite positive comments.

   • 👍Compact, lightweight body with excellent image quality, autofocus, and stabilization, offering pro-level video at a reasonable price.
   • 🤔Body feels less solid than predecessor; kit lens is sharp but plasticky, a step back in build quality.
   • 👍Highly customizable and easy to use for beginners, with auto and scene modes, plus a huge lens selection.
   • 👎One reviewer's old 4/3 lenses require an adapter and lose continuous autofocus, though they were happy after buying new lenses.
10. Q2 202090/1004.8★4 条评价

    Buyers in Q2 2020 praised the E-M5 Mark III for its lightweight, weather-sealed body, image quality, and features like dual IS and articulating screen. Some noted a steep learning curve and criticized the menu system and manual.

    • 👍Lightweight, weather-sealed, and ergonomic body with excellent image quality and features like dual IS and articulating screen.
    • 🤔Learning curve is manageable but menus and manual are non-intuitive; users rely on external resources.
    • 👍Fast, accurate autofocus with 121-point phase detect, plus advanced features like Hi-Res Shot and Pro Capture.
    • 👍Great value, especially with discounts, and a worthy upgrade from older models or other brands.
11. Q1 202096/1004.9★13 条评价

    Buyers in Q1 2020 praised the E-M5 Mark III as a compact, lightweight camera with excellent image quality, IBIS, and autofocus, often calling it a mini E-M1 II. Minor complaints included plastic build, lack of Olympus Capture support, and USB charging limitations.

    • 👍Compact and lightweight body, often described as a mini E-M1 II, ideal for travel and street photography.
    • 👍Excellent image quality, IBIS, and autofocus performance, with several users noting significant upgrades from older models.
    • 🤔Plastic construction initially felt cheap but was generally accepted as sturdy and well-built after use.
    • 👎Lack of Olympus Capture software support and USB charging limitations were noted as drawbacks.
12. Q4 201991/1004.9★7 条评价

    Buyers in this period praised the E-M5 III as a compact, feature-rich upgrade with excellent stabilization, controls, and build quality. Minor complaints included lack of panorama stitching and battery size concerns.

    • 👍Compact size and ergonomics praised; comfortable balance with lenses, well-laid-out controls.
    • 👍Feature set and performance lauded: 20MP sensor, AF improvements, weatherproofing, and stabilization.
    • 👍Upgrade value highlighted from older models like E-M5 II, E-M10 II, and Pen-F.
    • 👎Missing in-camera panorama stitching noted; battery size concerns mentioned but not widely experienced.

基于 83 条带日期的客户评价，按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。