Philips TAT3519GY/00

★★★★☆ 4.0 (142)

Adaptive noise cancellation with wind suppression and a 10mm dynamic driver with tap-activated bass boost deliver 8 hours of earbud playtime, extending to 24 hours via the compact charging case. Multipoint Bluetooth 5.3 enables dual-device connectivity, while touch controls and EQ can be customized through the Philips Headphones app. They’re ideal for commuters and frequent callers seeking reliable travel ANC and a secure, IPX4-rated fit that handles workouts and all-day wear.

form factor in-ear
driver type dynamic
Wireless Sim
active noise cancellation Sim
bluetooth version 5.3
battery life hours 8
case battery hours 24
water resistance IPX4
Philips TAT3519GY/00 earbuds
56 Pontuação Geral

Sem preço atual de lojas

Também disponível em:

Resumo

The 30-Second Version

The Philips TAT3519 true wireless earbuds offer surprisingly strong adaptive noise cancellation for around $60 USD, competing with buds that cost much more. Sound quality is average and real-world battery life often falls short of the advertised 6-8 hours, with some owners reporting 3-4 hours. They're a solid budget pick if ANC is your priority and you don't mind frequent charging.

Pros & Cons

Prós

  • Excellent adaptive ANC for the price 97th
  • Comfortable fit, especially with foam tips 91st
  • Bluetooth 5.3 with reliable multipoint 79th
  • Useful companion app with EQ and controls 74th
  • Compact, pocketable charging case

Contras

  • Real-world battery life falls well short of claims
  • Sound quality is just average for the category
  • ANC can cause ear pressure for some users
  • Bulky bud shape isn't great for side sleepers
  • No voice announcements for ANC or mute status

O que dizem os donos

The Word on the Street

4.0/5 (142 reviews)
👍 Buyers consistently praise the noise cancellation and overall value compared to bigger brands.
🤔 Battery life is the biggest point of contention, with several owners reporting 3-6 hours instead of the advertised numbers.
👎 A few users mention ear pressure from the ANC and discomfort when lying on their side with the buds in.

Como a opinião dos donos mudou ao longo do tempo

Exclusivo

Com base em quando os clientes realmente escreveram suas avaliações - para ver se os elogios iniciais se mantiveram.

A opinião dos donos esfriou desde o lançamento
72/100Nossa análise de sentimento por IAconfiança baixa · 8 fontes · mai. de 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '25: 4.7★ · 3 avaliaçõesQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 avaliaçãoQ3 '25: 3.0★ · 2 avaliaçõesQ4 '25: 3.5★ · 2 avaliações3122Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25
Avaliação médiaSatisfeitos (4-5★)Insatisfeitos (1-2★)Altura da barra = número de avaliações

Com base em 8 avaliações de clientes datadas, agrupadas por trimestre civil. A análise por período está em inglês.

As provas

Performance

Let's talk about what these earbuds do well first. The adaptive ANC is genuinely impressive for this price bracket. Our database puts it in the 97th percentile for noise cancellation, which means it's competing with earbuds that cost two or three times as much. It reacts to your environment and does a solid job suppressing background noise, including wind. Awareness Mode works as advertised too, letting outside sound back in when you need it. The Quick Awareness feature that enhances voices is handy for ordering coffee without pulling a bud out.

Sound quality is a mixed bag. The 10mm drivers deliver warm, bass-forward audio that's pleasant for casual listening. Dynamic Bass helps at low volumes, which is a nice touch for late-night listening. But our sound score lands in the 29th percentile, which is disappointing. The bass can get muddy, and the overall tuning lacks the clarity and detail you'd get from something like the Sony WF-C700N. For podcasts and pop music, it's fine. For critical listening, you'll notice the shortcomings. Connectivity is a bright spot at the 91st percentile. Bluetooth 5.3 with multipoint means you can connect to two devices simultaneously, and pairing is quick and reliable.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 97.2
Mic 67.1
Build 79.2
Sound 28.9
Battery 73.8
Comfort 72
User Sentiment 32.4
Connectivity 90.8
Prova social 61.7

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style true wireless
Ear Tips S, M, L
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Driver Size 10
Codecs Philips TAT3519 Wireless Earbuds,True Wireless Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro,Dynamic Bass,Clear Call,24 H Battery Life,Fast Charging,Bluetooth 5.3,IPX4,App/Touch Control,Black

Noise Control

ANC Yes
ANC Type adaptive
Transparency Yes

Connectivity

Wireless Yes
Bluetooth 5.3
Multipoint Yes

Earbud Battery

Battery Life 8
Fast Charging 15 minutes for 1 hour
Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Battery 24
Case Charging USB-C

Microphone

Microphone Yes
NC Mic Yes

Features

Touch Controls Yes
App PHILIPS Headphones app
Water Resistance IPX4

vs Competition

Stacked against the Sony WF-C700N, the Philips TAT3519 actually wins on ANC performance, which is wild given the price difference. Sony's buds are more refined overall with better sound and more consistent battery life, but you're paying for that polish. The Soundcore P31i is the closer direct competitor. Soundcore's app is more mature, and their battery claims tend to hold up better in real-world use. But the Philips buds have stronger noise cancellation. The EarFun Air Pro 4+ is another budget option with solid ANC, and it typically delivers better sound quality than the Philips. If music is your priority, the EarFun or Sony are better picks. If ANC is your priority and you're on a tight budget, the Philips TAT3519 is surprisingly hard to beat.

Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation are in a completely different league on price, but it's worth noting the Philips buds punch above their weight on ANC. You're not getting the seamless Apple ecosystem integration or spatial audio tricks, but for a fraction of the price, the Philips TAT3519 covers the basics well. The Nothing Ear (3) is another step up in price with better sound and a more distinctive design. None of these competitors match the Philips on pure ANC value per dollar.

Spec Philips TAT3519GY/00 Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-N Sony WF-1000XM6 Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Nothing Buds 2
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic
Wireless true true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation true true true true true true
Bluetooth Version 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4
Battery Life Hours 8 8 8 8 6 13.5
Case Battery Hours 24 28 24 24 26 55
Water Resistance IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IP57 IP57 IP55
Multipoint true true true true true true
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produto AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivityProva social
Philips TAT3519GY/00 97.267.179.228.973.87232.490.861.7
Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-N Compare 97.297.579.29978.77297.299.881
Sony WF-1000XM6 Compare 97.299.879.288.475.47280.299.181
Apple AirPods Pro 3rd Generation Compare 97.28298.890.675.494.732.499.699.3
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro Compare 97.297.598.89372.894.732.499.690
Nothing Buds 2 Compare 9397.591.281.895.5729296.981

Preço

Value & Pricing

At around $60 USD, the Philips TAT3519 is priced to compete with budget heavyweights like the Soundcore P31i and EarFun Air Pro 4+. You're getting adaptive ANC that outperforms most of the competition in this range, plus multipoint and a decent app. That's a strong value proposition on paper. But the battery inconsistency reported by owners complicates things. If you're getting 3-4 hours instead of the advertised 6-8, the value equation shifts. The Sony WF-C700N costs more but delivers more consistent performance across the board. Still, if you can live with the battery quirks and want top-tier ANC on a budget, these are worth a look.

Saiba mais

Overview

The Philips TAT3519 sits in that crowded budget true wireless earbud space, usually hovering around $60 USD. That's aggressive pricing for a pair with adaptive noise cancellation, Bluetooth 5.3, and multipoint connectivity. Philips is clearly trying to undercut the big names while still offering a feature set that looks impressive on paper. And on paper, these things look great. 10mm dynamic drivers, IPX4 water resistance, an app with EQ and touch control customization, and ANC that supposedly adapts to your surroundings in real time.

But specs only tell part of the story. The real question people search for is whether these budget buds actually deliver where it counts. Is the Philips TAT3519 good for calls? Is the noise cancellation actually effective? How does the battery hold up in real life? We dug into our database and user feedback to find out. The short version: there's a lot to like here, but one spec in particular doesn't quite match reality.

For the money, you're getting a surprisingly complete package. The case is compact, setup is painless, and the companion app is genuinely useful. But the gap between advertised battery life and what owners actually report is wide enough to drive a truck through. We'll get into that below.

Common Questions

Q: Is the Philips TAT3519 good for noise cancellation?

Yes, the adaptive ANC on the Philips TAT3519 is excellent for the price, ranking in the 97th percentile in our database. It reacts to your surroundings in real time and handles wind noise well.

Q: How long does the Philips TAT3519 battery actually last?

Philips advertises up to 8 hours per charge with ANC off and 6 hours with ANC on, but real-world reports vary. Some owners get the full advertised time, while others report 3-4 hours at moderate volume.

Q: Are the Philips TAT3519 earbuds good for calls?

Call quality is decent but not outstanding. The dedicated mic and noise reduction algorithm help your voice come through clearly, but the mic performance ranks around the 68th percentile, so it's solid but not class-leading.

Q: Can you sleep with the Philips TAT3519 in?

It depends on your sleeping position. The buds are somewhat bulky, and some owners report discomfort when side-sleeping. If you're a back sleeper, they'll probably work fine.

Who Should Skip This

Skip the Philips TAT3519 if battery life is a dealbreaker for you. The gap between advertised and real-world battery performance is too wide to ignore, and if you need earbuds that last a full workday without a case charge, you'll be frustrated. Side sleepers should also look elsewhere, as the bulky bud shape causes discomfort for some. If sound quality is your main concern, the EarFun Air Pro 4+ or Sony WF-C700N deliver noticeably better audio for not much more money. And if you're sensitive to the ear pressure that ANC can create, these might not be comfortable for extended listening sessions.

Verdict

Should you buy the Philips TAT3519? If adaptive noise cancellation is your top priority and you're working with a budget around $60 USD, these are genuinely compelling. The ANC performance is the standout feature here, and it's better than it has any right to be at this price. The app is useful, connectivity is solid, and most owners find them comfortable, especially with foam tips swapped in.

But you need to go in with realistic expectations about battery life. The advertised numbers are optimistic at best. Multiple owners report getting 3-6 hours per charge, not the 6-8 hours Philips claims. That's a significant gap, and it's the main reason our user sentiment score sits in the 32nd percentile. If you need earbuds that will last through a full workday without a case top-up, look elsewhere. If you're okay with charging more frequently and want great ANC on a budget, the TAT3519 delivers where it counts.

Usage Scores

Calls (54.7)Music (42.2)Geral (56.4)Budget (56.2)Jogos (49.9)Travel (57)Commute (53.6)Fitness (53.9)

Produtos semelhantes