HP 15.6" Silver
概要
The 30-Second Version
This HP pairs a CPU in the 22nd percentile with RAM in the 14th percentile, making it one of the least capable budget laptops we've seen. Its 672GB of storage is a pleasant surprise, and 16 happy buyers give it a 4.9-star rating. But for $699, you can get far better core performance elsewhere.
Pros & Cons
長所
- 672GB total storage (512GB SSD + 160GB dock SSD) is unusually generous, 61st percentile for capacity 76th
- 4.9-star rating from 16 reviews places social proof in the 70th percentile, suggesting owners are content
- 15.6" IPS anti-glare screen is adequate for long work sessions, though its quality is only in the 38th percentile
- Includes a docking station with an extra SSD, a rare value-add at this price
短所
- CPU is in the 22nd percentile, making it one of the slowest in its class for everyday multitasking
- 8GB RAM ranks in the 14th percentile, causing frequent slowdowns with moderate workloads
- Integrated UHD Graphics score a miserable 10.6 out of 100 for gaming, completely unsuitable for 3D or creative work
- Build quality and reliability flagged in the 31st percentile, raising long-term durability concerns
- Display quality, while IPS, is only 38th percentile and won't win any color accuracy awards
実証データ
Performance
The Intel i3-N305 is an 8-core processor built entirely on efficiency cores, and it shows. In our database, it falls into the 22nd percentile, meaning even many older Celeron and Pentium chips outrun it. Multitasking is a struggle. With just 8GB of single-channel RAM (14th percentile), opening more than eight Chrome tabs alongside a document will bring the system to its knees. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics are equally disappointing, scoring a 10.6 out of 100 for gaming, which makes this laptop useless for anything beyond solitaire or streaming video. The 512GB NVMe SSD delivers decent sequential reads, but the CPU bottleneck prevents it from feeling snappy.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| CPU | Intel N-Series N305 |
| Cores | 8 |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Graphics
| GPU | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Type | Integrated |
| VRAM Type | Shared |
Memory & Storage
| RAM | 8 GB |
| Storage 1 | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD |
| Storage 2 | 160 GB |
| Storage 2 Type | SSD |
Display
| Size | 15.6" |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 (Full HD) |
| Panel | IPS |
Connectivity
| USB-C Ports | 1 |
| USB Ports | 2 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 |
Physical
| OS | Windows 11 Home |
vs Competition
Forget the MacBook Pro M5 Pro or ASUS ProArt PX13 here. Those machines exist in a different performance galaxy, with CPUs in the 95th percentile and up. Even when comparing the HP to true budget rivals, the i3-N305's 22nd percentile showing is a letdown. A Lenovo Ideapad 3 with a Ryzen 5 or an Acer Aspire with an i5-1335U will deliver CPU performance 30-40% faster while keeping RAM at 16GB for roughly the same money.
| Spec | HP 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro M4 Max | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WW-G14.R95080 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP940XHA-KG3US | MSI Prestige PRE13EVOA2088 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel N-Series N305 | Apple M4 Max | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Core Ultra 7 258V |
| RAM (GB) | 8 | 64 | 32 | 64 | 32 | 32 |
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 4096 | 2000 | 2048 | 1024 | 1000 |
| Screen | 15.6" 1920x1080 | 14.2" 3024x1964 | 14" 2880x1800 | 16" 2560x1600 | 14" 2880x1800 | 13.3" 2880x1800 |
| GPU | Intel UHD Graphics | Apple (40-Core) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | Intel Arc Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | macOS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
| Weight (kg) | - | 1.6 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 1 |
| Battery (Wh) | - | 72 | - | - | 15 | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | CPU | GPU | RAM | ポート | 画面 | 携帯性 | ストレージ | 信頼性 | ユーザー評価 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP 15.6" | 20.7 | 32.8 | 13.7 | 36.4 | 41.5 | 38.4 | 59.4 | 32.7 | 76.1 |
| Apple MacBook Pro M4 Max Compare | 92.3 | 83.7 | 96.2 | 76.9 | 99.2 | 68.9 | 98.6 | 97.2 | 88.1 |
| ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WW-G14.R95080 Compare | 88.7 | 90.3 | 91.9 | 90.8 | 96.2 | 74.2 | 89.3 | 59.6 | 98.2 |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 Compare | 96.2 | 91.1 | 98.8 | 99.8 | 95.3 | 6.8 | 97.5 | 80.4 | 85.9 |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP940XHA-KG3US Compare | 66.8 | 63.2 | 80.9 | 63.6 | 95.7 | 87.1 | 80.4 | 80.4 | 97.2 |
| MSI Prestige PRE13EVOA2088 Compare | 63.6 | 63.2 | 80.9 | 80.6 | 91.2 | 96.1 | 72.4 | 59.6 | 85.9 |
価格
Value & Pricing
At $699, the HP 15.6" offers a weird trade-off. You're getting a massive storage pool and a docking station that most competitors skip, but the core hardware is painfully weak. Laptops with a Ryzen 5 5500U or Core i5-1235U routinely land in the 50th percentile or higher for CPU and RAM while matching this price. That extra 160GB dock SSD might be tempting if you need cold storage, but for $699 you're sacrificing processor performance that will make every daily task feel sluggish.
詳細情報
Overview
The HP 15.6" lands in the 22nd percentile for CPU performance in our database. That's not just below average, it's among the weakest chips we've tested in this category. The 8GB of RAM only makes things worse, sitting in the 14th percentile and guaranteeing stutters if you push past a handful of browser tabs. On the bright side, storage is a genuine highlight. The total 672GB (512GB SSD plus a bundled 160GB dock SSD) puts it in the 61st percentile, which is well above what most budget laptops offer. Buyers seem happy too, with a 4.9-star rating from 16 reviews putting social proof in the 70th percentile. But those warm feelings don't change the fact that the overall Benchmarks score is a limp 37.3 out of 100, dragged down by an abysmal 10.6 for gaming.
Common Questions
Q: Can this laptop run Photoshop or video editing software?
No. The i3-N305's CPU sits in the 22nd percentile and the integrated UHD Graphics scored 10.6 out of 100 for gaming. Both are far too weak for any serious creative work. Even light photo editing will be painfully slow.
Q: How well does it handle multitasking with multiple apps open?
Poorly. The 8GB of RAM is in the 14th percentile among all laptops in our database. Opening more than six to eight browser tabs alongside a word processor will cause noticeable lag and slowdowns. We wouldn't recommend it for anyone who needs to run Slack, a browser, and Office at the same time.
Q: Is the docking station's extra 160GB SSD useful?
It can be handy for storing documents, photos, or backups, but it won't improve system performance. That extra drive is best used as simple bulk storage. Just don't expect it to run apps faster, since the main internal 512GB SSD is already adequate for that.
Who Should Skip This
Anyone who keeps more than a handful of browser tabs open or uses applications heavier than a basic text editor should look elsewhere. The 22nd percentile CPU and 14th percentile RAM will frustrate students, remote workers, and budget gamers alike. Even casual photo editing or streaming while multitasking is enough to bring this machine to a crawl.
Verdict
The HP 15.6" only makes sense if you specifically need that 672GB of total storage and a docking station for $699, and if your workflow stays firmly in one or two lightweight apps at a time. For anyone who multitasks, edits photos, or expects a snappy Windows 11 experience, our benchmark data says you should spend the same money on a machine with a stronger CPU and more RAM, even if it means a slightly smaller SSD.