HP RTX 2000 Ada 16GB GDDR6 workstation

Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, this card stands out with 16GB of ECC GDDR6 memory and 2816 CUDA cores for error-corrected precision in compact workstations. Its 70W TDP and blower-style cooler enable dense multi-GPU deployment while driving four 5K displays natively. This GPU is best for engineers and scientists running certified professional applications where data integrity and multi-display setups are critical.

GPU RTX 2000 Ada
VRAM 16GB GDDR6
Boost Clock 2130 MHz
TDP 70 W
Memory Bus 128 bit
Ray Tracing はい
Class workstation
HP RTX 2000 Ada 16GB GDDR6 workstation gpu
49 総合スコア

現在、販売店の最新価格はありません

概要

The 30-Second Version

The HP RTX 2000 Ada is a 70W workstation card with 16GB of ECC VRAM and best-in-class efficiency. It scores 51.4 for workstation use but only 30.9 for 4K gaming. Worth it for pros who need ECC and low power, not for gamers.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • 16GB of ECC VRAM is a lifesaver for long compute jobs. 99th
  • 70W TDP means it sips power and fits in compact workstations. 67th
  • Efficiency is best-in-class at the 99th percentile. 67th
  • Four Mini DisplayPort 1.4a outputs drive up to four 5K displays.

短所

  • Thermal performance is a weak spot at the 21st percentile.
  • Ray tracing and raster scores lag behind most cards.
  • Blower cooler gets loud under sustained load.
  • Price is hard to justify for non-workstation buyers.

実証データ

Performance

The 2816 CUDA cores and 12 FP32 TFLOPS put this card in a weird spot. For workstation tasks, it's solid. The 16GB of ECC VRAM is a real selling point for anyone running long renders or simulations where a flipped bit means a redo. PassMark G3D hits 16973, which is fine for a 70W card. But raster performance sits at the 39th percentile, and ray tracing is 37th. This is not a gaming card, and the 4K gaming score of 30.9 confirms it. The 256 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate, but the 128-bit bus holds it back compared to wider workstation cards.

Performance Percentiles

AI 67.1
Rt 36.3
Vram 66.9
Raster 38.6
Compute 31.1
Feature 42.9
Thermal 20.6
Efficiency 99.4
Connectivity 49.2
Affordability 24.1

Specifications

Full Specifications

Chipset

GPU Chipset RTX 2000 Ada
Brand NVIDIA
Architecture Ada Lovelace
Class workstation
Process 5

Memory

VRAM 16 GB
Memory Type GDDR6
Memory Bus 128
Bandwidth 256
ECC Yes

Compute

CUDA Cores 2816
Tensor Cores 88
RT Cores 22
Base Clock 1620
Boost Clock 2130
FP16 TFLOPS 12
FP32 TFLOPS 12

Performance

PassMark G3D 16973
GPU Compute 7874

Power & Cooling

TDP 70
Recommended PSU 300
Cooler Blower
Fans 1

Connectivity

Interface PCI Express 4.0 x8
DisplayPort 4
HDMI 0
Max Displays 4
Max Resolution 8K

Physical

Slot Width 2
Weight 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs

Features

Ray Tracing Yes
DirectX 12

vs Competition

Stacked against the ASUS TUF RTX 5090 or MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti, the RTX 2000 Ada looks slow. Those cards have way more cores, wider memory buses, and higher power limits. But they also pull 300W plus and lack ECC. The Gigabyte AORUS RTX 5080 and ZOTAC RTX 5080 are in a different league for gaming and raw compute. The Sapphire NITRO+ is an AMD option that trades blows on raster. For pure workstation reliability in a small form factor, the HP card holds its own. For everything else, it gets lapped.

Spec HP RTX 2000 Ada ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G
Chipset RTX 2000 Ada GeForce RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5080 Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Vram 16GB GDDR6 32GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 16GB GDDR7 24GB GDDR6
Boost Clock Mhz 2130 2407 2730 2482 2730 2680
Tdp W 70 575 360 300 360 339
Memory Bus Bits 128 512 256 256 256 384
Ray Tracing true true true true true true
GPU Class workstation consumer consumer consumer consumer consumer
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIRtVramRasterComputeFeatureThermalEfficiencyConnectivityAffordability
HP RTX 2000 Ada 67.136.366.938.631.142.920.699.449.224.1
ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare 96.990.197.698.797.696.272.424.699.33.5
Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare 85.395.288.794.293.296.291.557.89415.1
MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare 79.292.285.688.887.996.291.572.99421
ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare 85.397.588.794.293.296.291.557.89419.1
Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare 94.996.191.783.895.583.991.552.798.717.6

価格

Value & Pricing

At $1,067 to $1,164 USD, this is a tough sell for anyone outside a professional workflow. You're paying for ECC memory, low power draw, and the Ada Lovelace feature set, not raw speed. If your software needs certified drivers and ECC, the price makes sense. If you just want a fast GPU, there are gaming cards that crush this for less money. The affordability score sits at the 24th percentile, which tells you everything.

詳細情報

Overview

The HP RTX 2000 Ada is a workstation card that knows exactly what it is. 16GB of ECC GDDR6, a 70W TDP, and a blower cooler that keeps heat out of your case. It's built for CAD, rendering, and AI-adjacent tasks, not for chasing frames in Cyberpunk.

Our database puts it at 51.4 for workstation use and 48.7 overall. The efficiency score is off the charts, 99th percentile. But the thermal score is rough, 21st percentile. That blower earns its keep, and you'll hear it.

Common Questions

Q: Can I game on the RTX 2000 Ada?

You can, but it's not great. The 4K gaming score is 30.9 out of 100, and raster performance sits at the 39th percentile. It'll handle older or less demanding titles at 1080p, but this card is built for work, not play.

Q: Does the blower cooler make a lot of noise?

Yes, under sustained load the blower fan spins up and gets audible. The thermal score is only 21st percentile, so the cooler works hard to keep the 70W chip in check. It's a trade-off for the compact, case-exhausting design.

Q: Is ECC memory worth the extra cost?

For long renders, simulations, or any compute job where a memory error means wasted hours, yes. ECC catches and corrects single-bit errors. If you're just gaming or doing light productivity work, you won't notice the difference.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you want a gaming card or need high raw compute. The RTX 2000 Ada gets smoked by cheaper consumer GPUs in raster and ray tracing. If you don't need ECC or a 70W power envelope, buy a RTX 5070 Ti or RX 7900 XT and pocket the difference. Also skip it if you need quiet operation, the blower cooler is not subtle under load.

Verdict

Buy this if you run certified workstation apps, need ECC memory, or have a strict power budget. It's a purpose-built tool, not a toy. CAD designers, 3D modelers, and AI tinkerers who value stability over speed will get their money's worth. Everyone else should keep scrolling.

Usage Scores

総合 (48.7)AI/LLM (48.9)Budget (38.9)Gaming 4k (30.8)Ray Tracing (31.1)Workstation (53.7)Gaming 1080p (38.8)Gaming 1440p (36)Content Creation (37.5)
  • 総合48.7
  • AI/LLM48.9
  • Budget38.9
  • Gaming 4k30.8
  • Ray Tracing31.1
  • Workstation53.7
  • Gaming 1080p38.8
  • Gaming 1440p36
  • Content Creation37.5

類似製品