PNY Quadro RTX 5000 32GB GDDR6 workstation
Equipped with 32GB of ECC GDDR6 memory and 12,800 CUDA cores on the Ada Lovelace architecture, this card delivers reliable precision for multi-application rendering and FP32 compute tasks. Its 100 third-gen RT Cores and 400 fourth-gen Tensor Cores accelerate AI inferencing, while Quadro Sync II compatibility ensures seamless multi-display setups. This GPU is best for AI developers training large language models and engineers running complex simulations where data integrity is non-negotiable.
現在、販売店の最新価格はありません
概要
The 30-Second Version
The PNY Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation card built for AI and professional workloads, with 32GB of ECC memory and AI performance in the 96th percentile. It's expensive at $4,799 USD and runs hot, but the certified drivers and ECC memory make it worth it for professionals who can't afford crashes. If you're gaming or doing light content work, buy something cheaper. If you're training models or rendering for a living, this is a serious tool.
Pros & Cons
長所
- 32GB of ECC GDDR6 memory is enough for serious AI and rendering workloads 96th
- AI performance in the 96th percentile, one of the best on the market 95th
- 12,800 CUDA cores deliver strong compute performance across the board 90th
- ECC memory catches errors that would crash consumer cards
- Certified drivers for professional apps like SolidWorks, Maya, and CUDA
短所
- Thermals in the 7th percentile, this card runs hot and loud
- Only one DisplayPort output, connectivity is a real weak spot
- 230W TDP with efficiency in the 23rd percentile, it drinks power
- Price around $4,799 USD puts it out of reach for most individuals
- Raster performance is mediocre, not a good fit for gaming
実証データ
Performance
Let's talk raw numbers. The PassMark G3D score of 15,336 puts this card in the 90th percentile for compute, which is genuinely impressive. For context, that's the kind of score that handles real-time ray tracing in professional apps, complex physics simulations, and multi-hour rendering jobs without breaking a sweat. The 12,800 CUDA cores are doing a lot of heavy lifting here, and the 100 third-gen RT cores mean ray tracing is actually usable, not just a checkbox feature. But here's the thing: the RT performance sits at the 52nd percentile, which is solidly middle of the pack. It's fine, but it's not the reason you buy this card.
The AI performance is where this thing shines. At the 96th percentile for AI workloads, it's one of the best on the market right now. The 400 fourth-gen Tensor Cores are built for exactly this, and the 32GB of ECC memory means you can actually fit meaningful models in VRAM. ECC matters more than people realize. It catches and corrects memory errors that would otherwise corrupt your training run or crash your render. For a $4,799 card, that's the kind of reliability you're paying for. The raster performance is more modest at the 33rd percentile, which tells you this isn't a gaming card in disguise. It'll run games fine, but that's not the point.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Quadro RTX 5000 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace |
| Class | workstation |
Memory
| VRAM | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| ECC | Yes |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 12800 |
| Tensor Cores | 400 |
| RT Cores | 100 |
| Base Clock | 1620 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 15336 |
| GPU Compute | 6313 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 230 |
Connectivity
| DisplayPort | 1 |
| Max Resolution | 3840x2160 |
Physical
| Length | 356 |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
vs Competition
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5090 is the obvious comparison. It's newer, faster in raw raster performance, and probably costs less. But it's a gaming card. No ECC memory, no certified drivers, and good luck getting support from ASUS when your render crashes at 3 AM. The Gigabyte AERO RTX 5080 is another option, and it's a solid card for content creation. But again, it's not built for the same workloads. The MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti is cheaper still, but you're giving up VRAM and compute performance that this card has in spades.
The real competition for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is other workstation cards. The ZOTAC APOCALYPSE and Sapphire NITRO+ are both consumer cards trying to punch above their weight. They're fine for gaming and light content work, but they don't have the ECC memory or the driver certification that makes this card reliable for professional use. If you need a card that won't crash during a 12-hour render, the RTX 5000 is the safer bet. If you just want to play games, buy something else and save yourself a few thousand dollars.
| Spec | PNY Quadro RTX 5000 | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Quadro RTX 5000 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 32GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | - | 2407 | 2730 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 230 | 575 | 360 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | - | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | ユーザー評価 | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNY Quadro RTX 5000 | 96.2 | 51.7 | 95.3 | 32.9 | 90 | 42.9 | 6.6 | 23 | 15.6 | 43.2 | 3.1 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare | 85.3 | 95.2 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 88.8 | 15.1 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 94 | 88.8 | 21 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.1 | 91.7 | 83.8 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.7 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 17.6 |
価格
Value & Pricing
At $4,799 USD, this card is expensive. There's no way around it. The affordability score sits at the 3rd percentile, which means it's one of the most expensive cards in our database. But value isn't just about price. It's about what you get for that money. And for the right buyer, this card pays for itself. If you're running a business where an hour of downtime costs more than the card, the ECC memory and certified drivers are worth every penny. If you're a hobbyist who wants to play with AI models on the weekend, this is a terrible deal.
The comparison gets interesting when you look at consumer cards. An RTX 4090 costs less and delivers better raster performance. But it doesn't have ECC memory, it doesn't have certified drivers, and it doesn't have the same level of support. For professional work, those things matter. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is priced like a tool, not a toy. And tools that make you money are easier to justify than toys that just cost money.
詳細情報
Overview
The PNY Quadro RTX 5000 is the kind of card that makes IT managers nod approvingly while accountants quietly weep. This is a workstation card built on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, packing 32GB of ECC GDDR6 memory, 12,800 CUDA cores, and a price tag that sits somewhere around $4,799 USD. It's not trying to be a gaming card, and it doesn't care that your RTX 4090 gets more frames in Cyberpunk. This thing is built for people who train models, render scenes, and run simulations where a crash means losing six hours of work, not six minutes of a match.
Who is this for? AI researchers, data scientists, 3D artists, and engineers who need certified drivers, ECC memory, and the kind of stability that consumer cards just don't guarantee. The 32GB of VRAM is the headline here. That's enough to load large language models, handle massive CAD assemblies, or render complex scenes without constantly swapping to system memory. And with 400 fourth-gen Tensor Cores, it's genuinely built for AI workloads, not just graphics.
What makes this interesting is the positioning. It's not the absolute top of the stack, but it's close enough that most professionals won't feel the difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits in that sweet spot where you get serious compute power without jumping to the truly absurd prices of the flagship workstation cards. And PNY is one of the few partners NVIDIA trusts with Quadro cards, so build quality tends to be solid. Just don't expect it to be quiet or cool, because it's neither.
Common Questions
Q: Is the PNY Quadro RTX 5000 good for gaming?
It'll run games, but that's not what it's built for. The raster performance sits at the 33rd percentile, which is mediocre compared to consumer cards at this price point. You'd be paying a premium for ECC memory and certified drivers that don't matter in games. If gaming is your priority, an RTX 4080 or 4090 will give you better performance for less money.
Q: Can this card handle large AI models?
Yes, and this is where it shines. The 32GB of ECC GDDR6 memory is enough to load models that would crash consumer cards with less VRAM. The 400 fourth-gen Tensor Cores deliver AI performance in the 96th percentile, which is among the best we've seen. The ECC memory also catches errors that could corrupt training runs, which is a big deal for serious AI work.
Q: Why is this card so expensive compared to gaming cards?
You're paying for reliability and support, not just raw performance. The ECC memory, certified drivers, and professional-grade components cost more to produce and validate. The drivers are tested against professional applications like SolidWorks, Maya, and CUDA libraries, which consumer cards don't get. For businesses where downtime is expensive, that reliability is worth the premium.
Q: Does this card need special cooling?
It runs hot. The thermal performance is in the 7th percentile, which is one of the worst we've seen. The 230W TDP means it generates a lot of heat, and the card is 356mm long, so you'll need a case with good airflow and enough clearance. A well-ventilated case with multiple fans is pretty much required, and you might want to consider additional cooling if you're running sustained workloads.
Who Should Skip This
Gamers should absolutely skip this card. The raster performance is mediocre, the thermals are bad, and you're paying thousands of dollars for ECC memory and certified drivers that don't matter in games. An RTX 4080 or 4090 will give you better gaming performance for less money. Casual content creators should also look elsewhere. The RTX 5080 or even a high-end RTX 4070 Ti will handle video editing and 3D modeling fine without the workstation premium.
If you're on a budget, this card is a hard pass. The affordability score is in the 3rd percentile, which means it's one of the most expensive cards in our database. There are plenty of consumer cards that deliver 80% of the performance for half the price. Unless you specifically need ECC memory, certified drivers, or the 32GB of VRAM for AI workloads, you're better off saving your money and buying something more practical.
Verdict
If you're doing serious AI work, this is one of the best cards you can buy right now. The 32GB of ECC memory and 96th percentile AI performance make it a genuine workhorse for training models, running inference, and handling large datasets. The certified drivers mean your software will actually work, which is more than you can say for some consumer cards. And the ECC memory means you won't lose a week of work to a random memory error.
But if you're a gamer or a casual content creator, this card is overkill in the worst way. You're paying a premium for features you'll never use, and the thermal performance is genuinely bad. The single DisplayPort output is limiting, and the 230W TDP means you'll need a beefy power supply. For most people, a consumer card like the RTX 4080 or 4090 will serve you better and cost less. This is a professional tool, and it's priced like one.
Usage Scores
- 総合47.1
- AI/LLM78.8
- Budget22.8
- Gaming 4k29.7
- Ray Tracing35.5
- Workstation70.5
- Gaming 1080p25
- Gaming 1440p28.4
- Content Creation51.3