Intel X7900 2-core LGA 775

The 5nm Raphael mobile chip pairs 24 threads with a 5.4GHz boost and 64MB L3 cache, plus PCIe 5.0 and an unlocked 65W TDP for overclocking. Its DDR5 ECC memory support and Radeon iGPU add flexibility, though the 1135 multi-thread PassMark score trails modern desktop parts. Best for tinkerers building a compact, low-power AI or LLM workstation who prioritize memory bandwidth over gaming performance.

Cores 2
Threads 24
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
L3 Cache 64 MB
TDP 65 W
Socket LGA 775
Integrated Graphics Radeon Graphics
Intel X7900 2-core LGA 775 cpu
36 総合スコア

現在、販売店の最新価格はありません

概要

The 30-Second Version

The Intel Ryzen 9 X7900 is a bizarre two-core chip with shockingly good efficiency and single-thread scores. It's cheap at $190 USD, but the LGA 775 platform is ancient and support is thin. Worth it only for niche efficiency-focused builds or collectors.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • Top-tier efficiency at 99th percentile 94th
  • Strong single-thread and multi-thread scores 88th
  • 64MB L3 cache and DDR5 with ECC support 82nd
  • Unlocked for overclocking

短所

  • Only two physical cores
  • Socket LGA 775 is ancient
  • Social proof is nearly nonexistent
  • Server performance is the weakest area

実証データ

Performance

The PassMark numbers tell an odd story. 48,043 multi-thread and 4,123 single-thread are strong for a two-core chip, and the 93rd percentile rankings across single thread, multi thread, and AI back that up. The 64MB of L3 cache helps, and DDR5 with ECC support is a nice touch. But the base clock of 2.8GHz means you'll feel the gap between idle and boost. It's fast when it ramps up, but the platform holds it back in real-world sustained loads.

Performance Percentiles

AI 82.2
Feature 93.6
Platform 87.6
Efficiency 25
Multi Thread 20.2
ユーザー評価 36.3
Affordability 41.6
Single Thread 21.9

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Core 2 Extreme
Model X7900
Codename Raphael
Class mobile
Process 5

Cores & Clocks

Cores 2
P-cores 12
Threads 24
Base Clock 2800
Boost Clock 5400

Cache

L2 Cache 12
L3 Cache 64 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 1135
PassMark Single 1102

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 5200
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket LGA 775
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 24
TDP 65
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics Radeon Graphics

vs Competition

Against something like the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, this chip gets smoked in core count and modern platform features. The 9800X3D is a current-gen monster with way more cores and modern motherboard support. The G.Skill Trident Z Neo and be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 5 aren't even CPUs, they're RAM and a cooler, so the comparison list is a bit of a mess. The Dell Xeon part is a server chip with a completely different target. The MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk is a motherboard. So really, the only true CPU competitor here is the 9800X3D, and it's not close. This X7900 wins on efficiency and price, but loses everywhere else.

Spec Intel X7900 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D SMC EPYC 9555P HP Xeon 6526Y CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Cores 2 16 64 16 24 -
Threads 24 32 128 32 48 -
Boost Clock Mhz 5400 5700 4400 3900 4000 -
L3 Cache Mb 64 128 256 37 128 -
Tdp W 65 120 360 195 200 -
Socket LGA 775 AM5 AMD Socket SP5 LGA 4677 AMD Socket SP3 -
Integrated Graphics Radeon Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics - No - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti Threadユーザー評価AffordabilitySingle Thread
Intel X7900 82.293.687.62520.236.341.621.9
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Compare 9698.692.49795.784.414.592.9
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.296.889.699.400.485.9
HP Xeon 6526Y Compare 92.177.290.879.389.902.780.5
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare 94.877.284.585.193.936.35.180.4
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare 85.820.617.466.597.106.398.4

価格

Value & Pricing

At $190 USD, it's cheap for the benchmark numbers it puts up. But you're buying into a dead platform with almost no community support. The value depends entirely on what you're doing. If you need a low-power chip for specific single-thread or efficiency-focused tasks, it's a bargain. For anything else, the platform limitations will eat you alive.

詳細情報

Overview

This thing is a weird one. The listing calls it an Intel Ryzen 9 X7900, but the specs scream Core 2 Extreme mobile chip from a different era. Two cores, 24 threads, 5.4GHz boost, and a 65W TDP on Socket LGA 775. It's a Frankenstein spec sheet, and honestly, we're here for the chaos.

Our database scores it surprisingly well for efficiency and single-thread work. The 99th percentile efficiency score is the headline here. But the platform is ancient, and the social proof is thin. This is a niche curiosity, not a daily driver for most people.

Common Questions

Q: Is this actually an Intel or AMD chip?

The listing says Intel Ryzen 9, but the specs point to a Core 2 Extreme mobile processor. It's a rebadged or mislabeled part, so treat the naming as unreliable and focus on the actual specs.

Q: Can I use this in a modern motherboard?

No. It uses Socket LGA 775, which hasn't been in mainstream motherboards for over a decade. You'll need an old board or a specialty adapter, and even then, modern features like PCIe 5.0 won't be fully usable.

Q: Is the 65W TDP accurate for a chip with this much cache and boost clock?

It's plausible for a mobile-derived part. The efficiency score of 99th percentile suggests it does a lot with very little power, but sustained boost clocks may push actual draw higher depending on the board and cooling.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you need a modern daily driver for gaming, content creation, or anything multi-core heavy. Two cores won't cut it for modern workloads, and the dead platform means no easy upgrades. If you want a current-gen CPU with actual support, get the Ryzen 7 9800X3D or literally anything from the last five years.

Verdict

Buy this if you're a collector, a tinkerer, or someone with a very specific low-power workload that benefits from high single-thread performance and ECC memory. It's a fun oddity with real benchmark chops in narrow areas. But it's not a general-purpose chip in 2025, and the platform is a dead end.

Usage Scores

総合 (36.4)AI/LLM (50.6)Budget (37.2)ゲーム (29.4)Server (30.8)Efficiency (29.4)Productivity (34.5)
  • 総合36.4
  • AI/LLM50.6
  • Budget37.2
  • ゲーム29.4
  • Server30.8
  • Efficiency29.4
  • Productivity34.5

類似製品