Gigabyte 1TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
Nessun prezzo attuale dai rivenditori
Panoramica
The 30-Second Version
Fast in sprints, wheezes in marathons. Buy it for budget gaming, skip it for serious work.
Pros & Cons
Pro
- Blazing 7100 MB/s sequential reads 92nd
- Strong random performance for a DRAM-less drive 82nd
- Decent 700 TBW endurance 75th
- PCIe 4.0 speeds at a budget-friendly price point
Contro
- No DRAM cache, sustained performance suffers
- Terrible portable score, not for external enclosures
- Only 1TB capacity, no bigger options
- Customer rating is basically nonexistent
Le prove
Performance
The sequential numbers are legit. 7100 MB/s read and 6100 MB/s write put this drive in the top tier of PCIe 4.0 drives, and the random IOPS are even better at 940K read and 900K write. That's a standout showing for a DRAM-less drive. But here's the catch: without DRAM, sustained writes and heavy multitasking take a hit. The 700 TBW endurance rating is solid, but the portable score of 14.9 out of 100 is a real letdown. This thing is meant to sit in a desktop and stay there.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 1000 |
| Form Factor | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 7100 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 6100 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 940000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 900000 |
Hardware
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 700 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1500000 |
vs Competition
The Samsung 9100 PRO and Crucial T500 both have DRAM caches and better sustained performance, though they cost more. The Kingston Fury Renegade offers similar speeds with better endurance ratings. If you're just gaming and loading games, the 7000E holds its own. But for video editing or heavy workstation use, the WD_BLACK SN7100 or Lexar NM1090 PRO are safer bets. The 7000E wins on price, but you're giving up consistency to get there.
| Spec | Gigabyte 1TB SSD | Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 | Samsung 990 Pro MZ-V9P4T0BAM | SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE | Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU | Crucial T705 CT1000T705SSD5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1TB | 4TB | 4TB | 8TB | 4TB | 1TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Seq Read | 7,100 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,450 MB/s | 7,200 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s | 13,600 MB/s |
| Nand Type | - | TLC | TLC | TLC | SLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Endurance | 700 TBW | 4000 TBW | 2400 TBW | 4800 TBW | 2800 TBW | 600 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Prodotto | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | Riscontro degli utenti | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigabyte 1TB SSD | 82.2 | 92.3 | 14.6 | 54.9 | 75 | 1.4 | 52.8 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare | 99.4 | 98.7 | 90.5 | 92.5 | 93.4 | 86.8 | 6.5 |
| Samsung 990 Pro MZ-V9P4T0BAM Compare | 93.4 | 97.6 | 93.6 | 92.5 | 85.9 | 99.5 | 6.9 |
| SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE Compare | 87.1 | 96 | 93.6 | 98.1 | 88 | 95 | 3.9 |
| Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU Compare | 97.9 | 98.1 | 97.3 | 92.5 | 75 | 57.1 | 10.2 |
| Crucial T705 CT1000T705SSD5 Compare | 96.6 | 97.6 | 99.7 | 54.9 | 82.9 | 44.7 | 38.4 |
Prezzo
Value & Pricing
At around $190 USD, this drive is priced like a mid-range PCIe 4.0 drive but performs like a high-end one in short bursts. The problem is you can get drives with DRAM caches and better sustained performance for similar money. It's not a bad deal, but it's not the steal Gigabyte wants you to think it is.
Monitoriamo i prezzi di questo prodotto dal 9 nov 2026. Il grafico apparirà quando avremo più dati.
Approfondisci
Overview
The Gigabyte AORUS Gen4 7000E is a weird one. On paper it looks like a budget speed demon with 7100 MB/s reads and 6100 MB/s writes, but the DRAM-less design and that 2.5-star customer rating tell a different story. The one thing to know? This drive is fast in short bursts but falls apart when you actually push it hard.
Common Questions
Q: Will this fit in my laptop?
It's a standard M.2 2280 form factor, so it'll physically fit most laptops. But the portable score is terrible, and without DRAM it'll run hot and throttle in tight spaces. Stick to desktops with good airflow.
Q: Is the DRAM-less design a dealbreaker?
For gaming and everyday use, not really. Modern NVMe drives use HMB to borrow system RAM, so you won't notice much difference in load times. But if you're moving huge files or editing 4K video, you'll feel the slowdown.
Q: How does this compare to the Samsung 980 Pro?
The 7000E actually beats the 980 Pro on paper with faster sequential reads. But the 980 Pro has DRAM and better sustained performance. For pure gaming, the 7000E is fine. For anything else, the 980 Pro is still the safer pick.
Who Should Skip This
If you're editing video, running a workstation, or need a drive for an external enclosure, this isn't it. The DRAM-less design and terrible portable score will frustrate you. Go grab a WD_BLACK SN7100 or Samsung 9100 PRO instead. You'll pay more, but you won't be fighting thermal throttling and write slowdowns.
Verdict
The AORUS Gen4 7000E is a solid budget gaming drive if you can find it on sale. The sequential speeds are genuinely impressive, and for loading games or booting Windows, it'll feel snappy. But the DRAM-less design and that abysmal portable score mean this isn't the drive for content creators or anyone who needs sustained write performance. If you're building a budget gaming rig and want fast load times without breaking the bank, this works. Just don't expect it to keep up with the big boys when the workload gets heavy.
