AMD AD6700OKHLBOX
The 4.3GHz boost clock on this quad-core Richland APU pairs with an integrated Radeon HD 8670D GPU, making it a capable budget processor for light gaming and everyday tasks. Its 65W TDP and Socket FM2 compatibility offer an affordable upgrade path for older AM2/AM3 boards, with 8MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR3 support. This refurbished chip suits budget builders who need a drop-in CPU with decent integrated graphics for office work, web browsing, and casual gaming without a dedicated GPU.
Panoramica
The 30-Second Version
The AMD A10-6700 is an ancient quad-core APU that scores 36.5 out of 100 in our database. It's fine for keeping an old FM2 board alive if you can get it dirt cheap. At European prices of 196 to 212 EUR, it's a hard pass.
Pros & Cons
Pro
- Integrated Radeon HD 8670D means no GPU needed for basic use 78th
- 65W TDP keeps power draw and heat modest 66th
- 4.3GHz turbo gives it a little pep for everyday tasks
- Dirt cheap in some markets if you can find a deal
Contro
- Single-thread performance is bottom 40% of our database
- Multi-thread score of 3111 is painfully slow by modern standards
- Socket FM2 is a dead platform with zero upgrade path
- Efficiency is weak, you burn watts for very little output
Le prove
Performance
The A10-6700 posts a PassMark multi-core score of 3111 and a single-core score of 1601. For context, that single-thread number puts it in the bottom 40% of CPUs in our database. Multi-thread is even rougher, sitting near the bottom third. The 4.3GHz turbo helps a little, but Richland's 32nm architecture is ancient by today's standards. The integrated Radeon HD 8670D is fine for desktop use and maybe some very light retro gaming, but don't expect it to handle anything modern. The 65W TDP is reasonable, though efficiency still ranks in the bottom 40% because you're not getting much work done per watt compared to anything made in the last decade.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | A-Series APU |
| Model | A10-6700 |
| Codename | Richland |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 32 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 4 |
| P-cores | 4 |
| Threads | 4 |
| Base Clock | 3700 |
| Boost Clock | 4300 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 3111 |
| PassMark Single | 1601 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2133 |
| Channels | 2 |
| Max Memory | 64 |
| ECC | No |
Platform & Power
| Socket | Socket FM2 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 |
| TDP | 65 |
| Unlocked | No |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
vs Competition
Stacked against something like the Intel Core i3 14100F, the A10-6700 looks like it's from another planet. The i3 has modern architecture, vastly better single-thread performance, and actual upgrade options. Even the Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, which is also old, beats this APU in multi-threaded workloads thanks to its server-grade silicon. The be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 and Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 CSF-AM5 aren't direct competitors in the traditional sense, but they represent the modern AM5 ecosystem where even entry-level chips embarrass this Richland part. The only reason to pick the A10-6700 is if you already own an FM2 motherboard and refuse to let it die.
| Spec | AMD AD6700OKHLBOX | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | SMC EPYC 9555P | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Dell Inspiron 7700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 24 | 64 | 16 | - | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 | 128 | 32 | - | 12 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 4300 | 5700 | 4400 | 4400 | - | 4700 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 8 | 36 | 256 | 22 | - | 12 |
| Tdp W | 65 | 125 | 360 | 165 | - | 15 |
| Socket | Socket FM2 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA 2066 | - | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Integrated Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | Intel Graphics | - | - | - | Iris Xe 96EU |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Prodotto | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Riscontro degli utenti | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD AD6700OKHLBOX | 47.8 | 55.4 | 65.8 | 36.7 | 31 | 17.6 | 78.1 | 37.9 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 96 | 97.2 | 96.4 | 90.3 | 18.3 | 99.9 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.4 | 96.7 | 89.7 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.4 | 85.9 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X Compare | 89.1 | 63 | 81.7 | 74.8 | 84.5 | 70.7 | 17.5 | 73.8 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.8 | 20.7 | 17.4 | 66.8 | 97 | 0 | 6.4 | 98.4 |
| Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare | 60.9 | 70.1 | 71.7 | 99.5 | 64.6 | 25 | 3.6 | 82.3 |
Prezzo
Value & Pricing
Value here is a mess because pricing is all over the map. We're seeing it listed around 40 CAD in Canada, which is basically pocket change. But in Europe it's going for 196 to 212 EUR, which is frankly absurd for a chip this old. At 40 bucks, sure, it's a cheap way to revive an old FM2 board. At 200 EUR, you're getting robbed. You could buy a modern budget CPU that runs circles around this thing for less. If you're not in a market where this is genuinely cheap, skip it.
Amazon 1 offerta Da 23.498 JPY
Price History
Approfondisci
Overview
The AMD A10-6700 is a blast from the past. This Richland APU launched back when DDR3 was king and Socket FM2 was AMD's budget playground. It's a quad-core chip with a 3.7GHz base clock, 4.3GHz boost, and a Radeon HD 8670D baked right in. For a refurbished part floating around at wildly different prices depending on where you live, it's a weird little time capsule.
Here's the thing though. Our database puts this chip's total score at 36.5 out of 100. That's not a typo. The single-thread performance lands in the bottom half of everything we've tested, and multi-thread is even worse. But if you just need something to keep an old FM2 board alive, it does have a pulse.
Common Questions
Q: Can the A10-6700 handle modern gaming?
Not really. The integrated Radeon HD 8670D can manage older titles and light indie games, but anything from the last decade will struggle. You'd need a dedicated GPU, and even then the CPU itself will bottleneck most modern games.
Q: Is this worth buying as a budget upgrade?
Only if you already have a Socket FM2 motherboard and can find this chip for very little money. If you're building from scratch, even the cheapest modern CPU will outperform it significantly.
Q: Does this processor support DDR4 memory?
The spec sheet lists DDR3 and DDR4 support, but Socket FM2 boards in practice almost exclusively used DDR3. Don't count on DDR4 compatibility unless you have a very unusual board.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're building a new PC, period. The Socket FM2 platform is dead, the performance is bottom-tier by modern standards, and there's no upgrade path. If you need anything resembling modern performance for gaming, content creation, or even snappy multitasking, look at a current budget chip instead. You'll spend less and get way more.
Verdict
This is a nostalgia purchase or a repair part, nothing more. If you've got an old FM2 system that needs a working CPU and you can grab this for pocket change, it'll do the job. It'll browse the web, play old games, and run office apps without falling over completely. But nobody should be building a new system around this in 2025. The performance ceiling is just too low.