Intel BX8071512900KS

★★★★★ 4.6 (431)

The 5.5GHz boost clock on this 16-core Alder Lake chip makes it one of the fastest desktop CPUs for single-threaded tasks, with a PassMark multi-core score of 43374. It pairs DDR5 memory support with PCIe 5.0 and an unlocked multiplier, giving builders headroom for overclocking on the LGA 1700 socket. Best for gamers and content creators who need top-tier frame rates and fast rendering, though its 241W turbo power demands a strong cooler.

Cores 16
Threads 24
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
L3 Cache 30 MB
TDP 150 W
Socket LGA 1700
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770
Intel BX8071512900KS cpu
85 Punteggio Complessivo
Disponibile anche in:

Panoramica

The 30-Second Version

The i9-12900KS hits 5.5GHz boost and posts a 43,374 PassMark multi-core score, landing in the 91st percentile for multi-threaded work and 94th for single-core. It's one of the fastest desktop chips we've tracked, but it pulls 241W under turbo and runs hot. Buy it for the speed, budget for the cooling.

Pros & Cons

Pro

  • 5.5GHz boost clock, one of the highest we've seen on a desktop chip 94th
  • PassMark single-core of 4,322 lands in the 94th percentile 92nd
  • 43,374 multi-core score handles heavy productivity workloads easily 91st
  • 16 cores and 24 threads with 30MB L3 cache 91st
  • PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support keep the platform future-proof

Contro

  • 241W turbo power draw means serious cooling is mandatory
  • No stock cooler included in the box
  • Efficiency score of 74.9/100 is the weakest area
  • Affordability sits at the 15th percentile, this chip is not cheap
  • Runs hot under load, several owners report needing undervolting

Cosa dicono i proprietari

The Word on the Street

4.6/5 (431 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently describe this as the fastest desktop chip they've used, with excellent performance in gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
👎 A recurring complaint is that the chip runs hot under load, with many reviewers saying a high-end cooler or undervolting is necessary to keep temperatures in check.
🤔 Value for money splits opinions, some buyers feel the price is justified by the speed, while others think it's too expensive for what you get.

Come è cambiata l'opinione dei proprietari nel tempo

Esclusiva

In base a quando i clienti hanno effettivamente scritto le recensioni, per vedere se gli elogi iniziali sono durati.

L'opinione dei proprietari si è raffreddata dal lancio
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '22: 5.0★ · 3 recensioniQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 2 recensioniQ4 '22: 4.0★ · 1 recensioneQ4 '23: 4.0★ · 1 recensioneQ2 '26: 4.5★ · 29 recensioni (data approx.)321129Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q4 '23Q2 '26
Valutazione mediaSoddisfatti (4-5★)Insoddisfatti (1-2★)Altezza della barra = numero di recensioniData stimata

Basato su 36 recensioni dei clienti datate, raggruppate per trimestre solare. L'analisi per periodo è in inglese.

Le prove

Performance

The headline number is 5.5GHz boost on the P-cores, which is the highest Intel shipped on Alder Lake. Our single-thread percentile of 94 means this thing is near the top of the charts for tasks that lean on one fast core, like older games or lightly threaded apps. The 4,322 single-core PassMark score backs that up. For multi-threaded work, the 43,374 score puts it in the 91st percentile, so it's a strong performer for video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking. The 30MB of L3 cache and 14MB of L2 help keep those 24 threads fed.

Memory support is DDR5 only, dual-channel, up to 128GB with ECC. That's a forward-looking platform with PCIe 5.0 support, which matters if you're planning to drop in a next-gen GPU or NVMe drive later. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is fine for troubleshooting or a basic display output, but nobody's buying this chip for the iGPU. The platform score sits at the 92nd percentile, so the LGA 1700 ecosystem around it is mature and well-supported.

Performance Percentiles

AI 90.8
Feature 83.7
Platform 91.6
Efficiency 85.5
Multi Thread 90.8
Riscontro degli utenti 84.3
Affordability 13.8
Single Thread 94.3

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Core i9
Model 12900KS
Codename Alder Lake
Class desktop
Process 7

Cores & Clocks

Cores 16
P-cores 8
E-cores 8
Threads 24
Base Clock 3400
Boost Clock 5500

Cache

L2 Cache 14
L3 Cache 30 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 43374
PassMark Single 4322

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 4800
Channels 2
Max Memory 128
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket LGA 1700
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 20
TDP 150
Max Turbo Power 241
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770

vs Competition

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the obvious modern rival, and it beats the 12900KS in gaming workloads thanks to its 3D V-Cache, though the Intel chip holds its own in raw multi-threaded productivity. The 12900KS also has an edge in single-core speed against most older parts, but it gives up efficiency badly. Against something like the MICRO CENTER 265KFPRO890WIFI bundle, you're comparing a proven high-clocker to a newer platform with better power characteristics. The 12900KS makes the most sense if you find it cheap and already have an LGA 1700 board, or if you're specifically avoiding the stability issues some users report with newer Intel chips.

Spec Intel BX8071512900KS AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Dell Inspiron 7700 Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx
Cores 16 8 - 10 - 2
Threads 24 16 - 12 - 2
Boost Clock Mhz 5500 5200 - 4700 - 2800
L3 Cache Mb 30 96 - 12 - 4
Tdp W 150 120 - 15 - 6
Socket LGA 1700 AM5 - Intel BGA 1744 - Intel BGA 1338
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 AMD Radeon - Iris Xe 96EU - Intel UHD Graphics
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Prodotto AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti ThreadRiscontro degli utentiAffordabilitySingle Thread
Intel BX8071512900KS 90.883.791.685.590.884.313.894.3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.798.595.288.989.299.523.795.1
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare 85.820.717.466.797.106.498.4
Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare 60.870.171.799.564.5253.682.3
Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X Compare 63.920.717.439.881.9039.685.7
HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx Compare 21.255.455.285.923.86.228.725.5

Prezzo

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place depending on where you shop. In the US, listings range from $213 to $590 across four vendors. That's a $377 spread, which is wild for the same chip. If you can find it near the low end of that range, it's a steal. At the high end, you're paying launch-day money for a chip that's now a generation or two old. In Canada, the spread is even wider at CAD 629 to CAD 1,298. The affordability percentile of 15 tells the story: this was never a budget part, and it still isn't. But if you catch a sale, the performance per dollar flips dramatically.

Da 87.633 JPY 1 offerta presso 1 rivenditore
Amazon 1 offerta Da 87.633 JPY

Monitoriamo i prezzi di questo prodotto dal 13 giu 2026. Il grafico apparirà quando avremo più dati.

Approfondisci

Overview

The i9-12900KS posts a PassMark multi-core score of 43,374 and a single-core score of 4,322. That single-core number lands in the 94th percentile of our database, which means this chip is one of the best on the market for raw per-core speed. The multi-core score sits at the 91st percentile, so it's also a standout for heavy workloads like rendering and video editing. You get 16 cores (8 performance, 8 efficiency) and 24 threads, with a 5.5GHz boost clock that Intel bins specifically for this Special Edition part.

But here's the thing: this is a 150W TDP chip that can pull 241W under turbo. That's a lot of heat, and the efficiency score of 74.9/100 reflects it. Owners consistently mention needing serious cooling, and Intel doesn't include a stock cooler in the box. If you're coming from a 14900K that kept crashing, several reviewers say this chip is a stable downgrade that saves money while barely losing gaming FPS.

Common Questions

Q: Does the i9-12900KS come with a stock cooler?

No, Intel doesn't include a cooler in the box. Given the 241W turbo power draw, you'll want a high-end air cooler or a 240mm+ AIO liquid cooler. Several owners report needing undervolting to keep temperatures reasonable even with good cooling.

Q: Is the i9-12900KS good for gaming?

Yes, the 5.5GHz boost clock and 4,322 single-core PassMark score put it in the 94th percentile for single-threaded performance, which is what most games care about. Owners report excellent gaming performance, though the Ryzen 7 9800X3D may edge it out in some cache-sensitive titles.

Q: How much power does the i9-12900KS draw?

It has a 150W TDP but can pull up to 241W under turbo load. That's why the efficiency score is only 74.9/100. You'll need a quality power supply and robust cooling to handle the heat output.

Who Should Skip This

If you're building a small form factor PC or care about power efficiency, look elsewhere. The 241W turbo draw and 74.9/100 efficiency score mean this chip will fight you in a tight case. Budget builders should also skip it, the affordability percentile of 15 says it all. And if you're not willing to spend extra on a decent cooler, you'll be fighting thermal throttling from day one. The lack of a stock cooler isn't a minor omission, it's a signal that Intel expects you to bring serious cooling to the table.

Verdict

The i9-12900KS is a speed demon with a heat problem. Our data shows it's a top-tier performer in single and multi-threaded workloads, and owners consistently call it the fastest desktop chip they've used. The catch is that 241W turbo draw and the lack of a stock cooler. If you're willing to invest in a good AIO or high-end air cooler, and you find it at a reasonable price, this chip still delivers. The 4.6-star average across 431 reviews backs up the performance claims. Just don't expect it to sip power.

Usage Scores

Complessivo (84.8)AI/LLM (83)Budget (78.4)Gaming (80)Server (75.5)Efficiency (74.9)Productivity (89.5)

Prodotti simili