KOMQI 2184

ग्राहकों ने वास्तव में अपनी समीक्षाएँ कब लिखीं, इसके आधार पर - ताकि आप देख सकें कि शुरुआती तारीफ़ टिकी या नहीं।

1. Q2 2020100/1003 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers in Q2 2020 praised the lens for its sharpness, color, and contrast, calling it a favorite and worth the price.

   • 👍Sharpness, color, and contrast are excellent.
   • 👍Becomes a favorite wide-angle lens, replacing others.
   • 👍Worth the price despite being expensive.
   • 👍Highly recommended without hesitation.
2. Q3 2017100/1005.0★3 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers in Q3 2017 praised this refurbished lens for its sharpness, depth of field, and compatibility with both DX and FX cameras.

   • 👍Lens works great on both DX (D500) and FX (D800) cameras.
   • 👍Excellent wide-angle performance and sharpness.
   • 👍Great depth of field and overall image quality.
   • 👍Highly recommended for DX cameras despite being full-frame lens.
3. Q1 2013100/1005.0★3 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praised the lens for outstanding detail, color, and low-light performance, especially with the D800e.

   • 👍Excellent image quality with sharpness, color, and dynamic range.
   • 👍Great low-light performance and fast f/1.4 aperture.
   • 👍Versatile for handheld and tripod use with good bokeh.
   • 👍No regrets despite high price; matches well with D800e.
4. Q2 201290/1004.8★4 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praise the lens as exceptional for low light and interiors, with creamy bokeh and sharpness, though some note high cost and slow autofocus.

   • 👍Exceptional image quality with creamy bokeh and sharpness.
   • 🤔High cost leads some to return despite loving the lens.
   • 🤔Slow autofocus and heavy weight noted as drawbacks.
   • 👍Excellent for low light and cramped interior photography.
5. Q1 201283/1004.7★3 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praise sharpness, color, and bokeh but note autofocus issues, flare, and a 'papery' image lacking depth compared to older Nikkors.

   • 👍Exceptional sharpness, color purity, and bokeh for a wide-angle prime.
   • 🤔Autofocus is slow; manual focus is excellent but not as good as older manual Nikkors.
   • 👎Flare more than older Nikkors; image can look 'papery' with blue-gray shadows.
   • 👎Lacks the 'bite' and three-dimensionality of older pro Nikkors or Leica lenses.
6. Q4 2011100/1005.0★3 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praised the lens for excellent low-light performance, sharpness, and edge quality, calling it an outstanding replacement for a discontinued model.

   • 👍Excellent low-light performance and sharpness.
   • 👍Great edge quality compared to other wide-angle lenses.
   • 👍Considered a worthy replacement for the discontinued 28mm F/1.4.
   • 👍Overall highly recommended and praised as remarkable.
7. Q3 201173/1004.2★6 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praise sharpness and low-light performance, but note edge softness at 17mm and slow autofocus speed.

   • 👍Sharp, fast, and excellent in low light; replaces zoom lenses.
   • 🤔Autofocus is accurate but slow, causing missed shots in fast-paced situations.
   • 👎Edge softness and corner distortion at 17mm focal length.
   • 👍Extremely sharp images; one user accused of HDR due to sharpness.
8. Q2 201180/1004.7★7 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, low-light performance, and versatile 24mm focal length, but note autofocus inconsistency and heavy weight.

   • 👍Sharpness, bokeh, and low-light performance are highly praised.
   • 🤔Autofocus can be inconsistent, especially at f/1.4, requiring careful calibration.
   • 👎Lens is heavy, and lacks VR, which some users miss.
   • 👍Versatile focal length works well on both DX and FX sensors.
9. Q4 201060/1004.2★5 समीक्षाएँ

   Buyers praise image quality, bokeh, and low-light performance, but many report autofocus issues at f/1.4, requiring calibration or replacement.

   • 👍Excellent sharpness, bokeh, and low-light performance.
   • 👎Autofocus inconsistent at f/1.4, especially beyond close distances.
   • 🤔AF is quiet and accurate but slower than f/2.8 zooms.
   • 👎Some units require repair or replacement due to focus defects.
10. Q3 201057/1003.9★7 समीक्षाएँ

    Buyers praise the lens's optical quality and low-light performance, but many report severe autofocus failures that prevent focusing beyond 30 feet.

    • 👍Superb optical quality, sharpness, color, and bokeh; best-in-class for many users.
    • 👎Autofocus fails beyond 30 feet on multiple bodies; unreliable and slow.
    • 👍Excellent build quality, weather sealing, and balanced feel.
    • 🤔High price justified by performance for some, but autofocus issues undermine value.

64 तिथि-युक्त ग्राहक समीक्षाओं पर आधारित, कैलेंडर तिमाही के अनुसार समूहित। अवधि-वार विश्लेषण अंग्रेज़ी में है।