Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR
Sa plage focale polyvalente 16-80mm, l’ouverture variable f/2.8-4 et la stabilisation VR sur 4 stops en font un zoom APS-C très adaptable. La formule optique incorpore 3 lentilles asphériques, 4 éléments ED et des traitements Nano Crystal et Super Integrated Coatings, livrée ici avec un kit UV et de nettoyage. Ce transstandard est particulièrement adapté aux photographes de rue et de voyage recherchant une qualité d’image élevée sans changer d’objectif.
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR is a premium standard zoom for Nikon DX cameras with excellent build quality, strong stabilization, and a versatile 24-120mm equivalent range. It's expensive at $1,220 to $1,300 USD, and autofocus is only average. But for everyday shooting, it's one of the best DX zooms you can buy.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- Excellent build quality, top 5% in our database 95th
- Very versatile 24-120mm equivalent range 93rd
- Strong VR stabilization, rated for 4 stops 93rd
- Bright f/2.8 aperture at the wide end 86th
- Great optical performance with Nano Crystal Coating
Points faibles
- Expensive at $1,220 to $1,300 USD
- Autofocus is only average
- Macro performance is poor
- No weather sealing
- Limited social proof, few reviews available
Les preuves
Performance
Optically, this lens is a standout. It sits in the 76th percentile overall, which translates to well above average sharpness and contrast across the frame. The combination of 3 aspherical elements, 4 ED elements, and Nano Crystal Coating does real work here. Flare and ghosting are well controlled, and colors come out clean. The fluorine coating on the front and rear elements also makes cleaning easier, which matters if you shoot outdoors a lot.
Stabilization is where this lens really shines. It ranks in the 93rd percentile, and Nikon claims 4 stops of VR correction. In practice, you can handhold at surprisingly slow shutter speeds and still get crisp shots. The aperture performance is also strong at the 85th percentile. That f/2.8 at 16mm lets in a lot of light for a zoom, and even at f/4 on the long end, it's brighter than most kit lenses. Bokeh quality is above average too, though don't expect creamy full-frame style blur from an APS-C zoom.
Autofocus is the weak link. The Silent Wave Motor ranks in the 54th percentile, which is about average. It's accurate and quiet, but not fast enough for demanding action or fast-moving subjects. For street and portrait work, it's fine. For sports or wildlife, you'll feel the lag.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 |
| Focal Length Max | 80 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 |
| ED Elements | 4 |
| Coating | Nano Crystal & Super Integrated Coatings |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | No |
Build
| Mount | Nikon F |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.1 kg / 0.3 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 72 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | Yes |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 |
vs Competition
The Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN is the most direct competitor in spirit. It's smaller, lighter, and has a constant f/2.8 aperture, which is nice for consistent exposure when zooming. But it tops out at 50mm, so you lose the portrait-friendly 80mm reach. The Sigma also lacks VR, which is a big deal if you shoot handheld in low light. The Nikon's stabilization advantage is significant here.
The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is another option worth considering. It covers a longer range and costs less, but the variable aperture gets slow quickly. At f/5.6 on the long end, you'll need more light or higher ISO. The Nikon's f/4 at 80mm is a full stop brighter. The Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 is a superzoom, so it's really a different category. More range, but much slower and softer. If you want one lens for everything including telephoto, the Tamron makes sense. If you want quality over quantity, the Nikon wins.
| Spec | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR | Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | 7Artisans Lite Series AutoFocus 35mm F1.8 Full Frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 16-80mm | 18-50mm | 17-70mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm | 35mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/1.8 |
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Nikon Z |
| Stabilization | true | false | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | false | false |
| Weight (g) | 118 | 290 | 544 | 306 | 326 | 426 |
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor | stepping motor | RXD | Autofocus | Linear motor | STM |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | prime |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Preuve sociale | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR | 53.9 | 84.4 | 94.7 | 13.3 | 75.4 | 86.3 | 93.4 | 20.4 | 92.8 |
| Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Compare | 85.5 | 84.4 | 85.5 | 91.6 | 81.2 | 86.3 | 78.5 | 90 | 36.1 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare | 53.9 | 89 | 67.4 | 85.6 | 90.3 | 86.3 | 89.6 | 85.5 | 81.3 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.9 | 84.4 | 84.7 | 50.1 | 85.7 | 86.3 | 80.6 | 85.5 | 96.6 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 78.5 | 71.6 | 39.3 | 77.6 | 80.2 | 95.9 | 90 | 81.3 |
| 7Artisans Lite Series AutoFocus 35mm F1.8 Full Frame Compare | 85.5 | 96.5 | 60.3 | 97.2 | 62 | 94.3 | 33.5 | 45.2 | 81.3 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
At $1,220 to $1,300 USD, this lens is a serious investment for a DX shooter. You're paying for the build quality, the versatile range, and the strong stabilization. But the value proposition gets murky when you look at alternatives. The Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN is significantly cheaper and offers a constant f/2.8 aperture, though it lacks the reach and VR. The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS covers more range for less money, but it's slower and not built as well. If you're on a Nikon F-mount DX body and want the best standard zoom available, this is it. Just know you're paying a premium for that position.
En savoir plus
Overview
The Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR is a premium standard zoom for Nikon F-mount APS-C cameras. It covers a 24-120mm equivalent range, which is about as useful as it gets for everyday shooting. You get a bright f/2.8 aperture at the wide end that steps down to f/4 when you zoom in. At $1,220 to $1,300 USD, this is not a casual purchase. It's aimed at DX shooters who want one lens that can handle street, portrait, and travel work without constant lens swaps.
People searching for a Nikon DX zoom lens often ask whether this one is worth the premium over cheaper options. The short answer is that the build quality and optical performance put it near the top of our database for this category. The 16-80mm range is genuinely versatile, and the VR stabilization is rated for 4 stops of correction. That means sharper handheld shots in low light without cranking ISO.
But there are trade-offs. Autofocus performance is middle of the pack, and macro capability is a real weak spot. If you shoot tiny subjects up close, this lens will frustrate you. For general photography though, it's one of the best DX zooms Nikon has made.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Nikon 16-80mm f/2.8-4 good for street photography?
Yes, it's excellent for street photography. The 24-120mm equivalent range covers wide scenes to tight portraits, and the f/2.8 aperture at the wide end handles low light well. The VR stabilization also helps with handheld shots in dim conditions.
Q: Does the Nikon 16-80mm f/2.8-4 have weather sealing?
No, this lens is not weather sealed. If you shoot in rain, dust, or harsh conditions, you'll need to take extra precautions or consider a weather-sealed alternative.
Q: How does the Nikon 16-80mm compare to the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8?
The Nikon has a longer zoom range and VR stabilization, while the Sigma is smaller, lighter, and has a constant f/2.8 aperture. The Nikon is better for handheld low-light work and portraits, but the Sigma is more portable and cheaper.
Q: Is the Nikon 16-80mm f/2.8-4 good for macro photography?
No, macro is this lens's weakest area. It ranks in the 14th percentile for macro performance, so if you shoot close-up subjects regularly, you'll want a dedicated macro lens instead.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this lens if you shoot macro, need weather sealing, or want fast autofocus for action. Macro performance is one of the worst we've seen in this category, so close-up shooters should get a dedicated macro lens. If you shoot in harsh outdoor conditions, the lack of weather sealing is a real problem. And if you photograph sports or wildlife, the average autofocus speed will hold you back. Budget-conscious shooters should also look at the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 or a used Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 instead.
Verdict
Should you buy the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR? If you shoot with a Nikon DX body and want the best standard zoom available, yes. The build quality is exceptional, the range is perfect for everyday use, and the stabilization is among the best we've tested. You'll get sharp, clean images in most situations.
But this lens isn't for everyone. The price is high, the autofocus is nothing special, and macro shooters should look elsewhere. If you need weather sealing, this lens doesn't have it. For most people, the 16-80mm range covers 90% of what they shoot, and this lens does it better than almost anything else in the category. Just make sure you actually need the premium features before spending the money.