Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art
Su resolución mejorada en todo el rango de zoom y el rápido enfoque automático HLA lo diferencian, complementado por una estabilización óptica de 4 pasos y un diseño un 10% más ligero que su predecesor. Su distancia mínima de enfoque de 170 mm permite una versatilidad cercana al macro, mientras que el anillo de apertura añadido y el sellado contra la intemperie mejoran el control táctil y la durabilidad. Este objetivo es ideal para fotógrafos de paisajes y viajes que necesitan un zoom f/2.8 nítido y portátil para monturas Sony E.
Resumen
En 30 segundos
Una bestia óptica con una nitidez central de escándalo y una estabilización genial, lastrada por un peso de gimnasio y un enfoque automático que te hará rezar. Si pillas una buena copia a buen precio, es el chollo del siglo.
Ventajas y desventajas
Ventajas
- Nitidez central de primer nivel, compite con lentes que cuestan el doble. 98th
- Estabilización óptica (OS) de 4 pasos súper efectiva para disparar a pulso. 94th
- Relación calidad-precio imbatible si encuentras una buena copia. 93rd
- Construcción sólida y sellado contra el clima, se siente como un tanque. 89th
Desventajas
- Pesa 1020g, se te va a clavar en el hombro después de un día de shooting.
- El AF es una lotería: puede ser perfecto o necesitar calibración con el dock USB.
- Las esquinas pueden quedar blandas, especialmente a 24mm y f/2.8.
- El anillo del zoom es sorprendentemente rígido en algunas unidades.
Opinión de los propietarios
Lo que dicen los usuarios
Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo
ExclusivaSegún cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.
- Q4 202688/100
Buyers praise the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN II Art for sharp image quality, versatile range, and solid build. Autofocus is fast in good light but can hunt in low light.
- Image quality is sharp, cinematic, and professional-grade.
- Versatile 24-70mm range covers most shooting needs without lens swaps.
- Great value compared to Sony GM, offering high performance at lower cost.
- Autofocus is fast in good light but hunts in low light conditions.
- Q3 202693/100
Buyers praise this lens as excellent, versatile, and a great value. Some note it is heavy but still recommend it.
- Excellent image quality and versatility for video and run-and-gun shooting.
- Great value compared to G series lenses, with competitive price.
- Lens is heavy but still recommended; weight is a noted drawback.
- Sharp center micro detail close to prime Sigma Art lenses.
- Q2 202682/100
Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, value, and versatility. A few note autofocus noise and low-light hunting.
- Sharp image quality and good value for the price.
- Versatile 24-70mm range suits hybrid photo/video work.
- Autofocus noise makes audio unusable for video.
- Autofocus hunts in low light, but fast in good light.
- Q1 202695/100
Buyers praise this Sigma lens as excellent value, delivering sharp, crisp images comparable to pricier Sony GM II. It's a versatile, sturdy favorite for daily use.
- Excellent value for money, often compared favorably to Sony GM II at half the price.
- Sharp, crisp image quality with great color and depth.
- Versatile and sturdy build, becoming a go-to lens for many.
- One reviewer noted it's heavier than expected, but still very happy.
- Q4 202575/100
Buyers praise image quality and color, but note the lens is heavy and may frustrate those without strong wrists or who don't edit RAW files.
- Great color and image quality, comparable to Zeiss lenses.
- Heavy but compact; may be frustrating for some shooting styles.
- Sharpness and performance for portraits and landscapes.
- Good for manual lens users seeking OIS and convenience.
- Q2 202580/100
Buyers praise sharpness, build quality, and image stabilization. One user reports focus issues and softness at wide end.
- Sharpness and build quality praised across Nikon D and Z cameras.
- Great image stabilization and suitability for documentary filmmaking.
- One user reports focus issues and soft spot at 24-35mm range.
- Overall satisfaction with lens as a versatile all-rounder.
- Q3 202267/100
Buyers praised the lens for its build, clarity, bokeh, and low-light performance, but one reviewer found it disappointing.
- Excellent build quality, clarity, and bokeh.
- Great low-light performance and versatility as an everyday lens.
- One reviewer felt the lens did not meet expectations.
- Q4 202133/100
Mixed reviews: one buyer loves the lens for sharpness and build, but two others report it is not sharp or incompatible with Canon.
- Lens is sharp, heavy in a good way, great for family shoots.
- Lens not sharp at all, buyer returned it.
- Lens incompatible with Canon despite being told otherwise.
- Q3 202195/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, versatility, and build quality, though noted it is heavy.
- Crisp, clear images with great versatility from 24-70mm at f/2.8.
- Lens is heavy, but users accept it for performance.
- Excellent build quality and fast delivery.
- Great value for cinema and video work.
- Q2 2021100/100
All 9 reviews are 5-star, praising image quality, sharpness, build, and value. Buyers highly recommend it for travel and professional use.
- Excellent image quality and sharpness consistently highlighted.
- Solid build and professional feel appreciated.
- Fast and accurate autofocus noted.
- Great value and versatility for travel and general use.
- Q1 202193/100
Buyers praise the lens for its fantastic image quality, solid build, and versatility across Canon and Sony systems. One notes it is heavy but solves focus issues on older DSLRs.
- Excellent image quality and sharpness, with one copy noted as sharper than others.
- Solid build quality and good ergonomics, feels great in hand.
- Works well with Sigma USB dock for micro focus adjustment on older Canon DSLRs.
- Lens is very heavy, a notable con for some users.
- Q3 202065/100
Buyers praised the lens quality and value versus Nikon, but noted heavy weight and autofocus issues that required firmware updates.
- Excellent image quality and value compared to Nikon's offering.
- Heavy weight; some found it manageable, others too heavy.
- Autofocus misses focus in about half of shots, even after firmware updates.
- Smooth zoom/focus action and good for weddings and portraits.
- Q1 202087/100
Buyers praise image quality and value versus Canon, but consistently note the lens is heavy, especially for long hikes.
- Sharp images, fast aperture, great for street and art photography.
- Good value compared to Canon counterpart.
- Lens is heavy (2.5 lbs); needs a harness for trail use.
- Works well with Canon 5DM4 and 6D Mark II.
- Q4 2019100/100
All six reviews are 5-star, praising the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and value. Buyers recommend it as a great all-around lens.
- Sharp image quality consistently highlighted across reviews.
- Excellent build quality, comparable to Canon/Nikon.
- Great value for money, not pricey for the quality.
- Versatile lens, ideal for walking around and low light.
- Q1 201993/100
Buyers praised the lens for its quality and value, though some noted it is heavy.
- Great image quality and ease of use
- Good value for the price
- Heavy weight noted as a drawback
- Positive experience with Adorama store
- Q4 201890/100
Buyers praised the lens for sharp focus, weather sealing, and value, though some noted initial focus issues and weight.
- Sharp focus, beautiful bokeh, and great flexibility for available light photography.
- Weather sealing and image stabilization are highly valued for outdoor use.
- Initial focus issues (back/front focusing) were easily fixed with optimization software.
- Lens is a little heavy, but worth the price for studio and event work.
- Q3 201872/100
Buyers praise sharpness and versatility, but one reports inconsistent autofocus and edge softness, calling it a dud compared to other Sigma lenses.
- Sharp lens, great image quality, and versatile focal lengths for various photography needs.
- Autofocus is fast but inconsistent; one user observed focus jumping at 70mm.
- Edge sharpness is lacking; center sharpness is okay but not exceptional.
- Zoom ring direction is reversed, which some find annoying but not a deal breaker.
- Q2 201888/100
Buyers praise the lens as sharp, versatile, and quick-focusing, but one notes soft corners and edges, especially at 24mm and 70mm, requiring micro-adjustment.
- Sharp, clear, and versatile for portraits, landscapes, and low light; excellent image quality.
- Soft extreme corners and edges at wide and telephoto ends, varying by focal length.
- Requires significant micro-adjustment for sharpness; calibration via USB dock needed.
- Fast and accurate autofocus, outperforming Canon and older Sigma models for run-and-gun shooting.
- Q1 2018100/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, precision, and value, with one noting it's a great alternative to Nikon's version.
- Sharpness and precision are excellent, matching or exceeding comparable lenses.
- Great value for the price, especially as an alternative to pricier options.
- Versatile focal length, ideal for wedding photography and general use.
- Helpful customer service, encouraging repeat purchases.
- Q4 201784/100
Buyers praised sharpness, image stabilization, and versatility, though some noted the lens is heavy and one reviewer hadn't tested it enough.
- Sharpness and image quality are excellent.
- Image stabilization and f/2.8 aperture are valued.
- Lens is heavy but build quality is solid.
- One reviewer couldn't provide definitive feedback due to limited use.
- Q3 201777/100
Buyers praised sharpness, color, and build, but some reported autofocus inconsistency and back/front focus issues, especially on Nikon and Canon bodies.
- Excellent sharpness, color, and bokeh; many prefer it over OEM lenses.
- Autofocus inconsistency, back/front focus issues reported on some bodies.
- Heavy and large; some find it cumbersome for travel or petite users.
- Softness at wide end and at f/4 noted by a few reviewers.
Basado en 135 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.
Las pruebas
Rendimiento
Lo que más nos sorprendió, y no para bien, es la inconsistencia del enfoque automático. En nuestra base de datos, su rendimiento AF está en un mediocre percentil 55, y los números no mienten. En papel, el HSM es rápido y silencioso, pero en la vida real, varios usuarios reportan que necesitas la estación de acoplamiento USB para microajustes y evitar problemas de enfoque frontal o trasero. Es un paso extra que con lentes de la competencia simplemente no necesitas. Eso sí, cuando clava el foco, la nitidez es una pasada, de las mejores del mercado.
Especificaciones
Especificaciones completas
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 |
| Focal Length Max | 70 |
| Elements | 19 |
| Groups | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4 |
| ED Elements | 3 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 1.0 kg / 2.2 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 82 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | HSM |
| Stabilization | Yes |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 170 |
| Max Magnification | 1:2.7 |
Frente a la competencia
El rival más directo es el Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2. El Tamron es mucho más ligero, tiene un AF más fiable y es igual de nítido en el centro, pero pierde los 4mm en el gran angular y no tiene la misma sensación de construcción premium. Si priorizas la portabilidad y un AF sin dramas, el Tamron es mejor compra. Si lo tuyo es la mejor calidad de imagen posible y no te importa el peso, el Sigma es tu lente. Frente a un Sony G Master 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II, el Sigma aguanta el tipo en nitidez, pero pierde por goleada en velocidad y precisión de enfoque, además del peso.
| Spec | Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 | Canon EF EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-70mm | 28-300mm | 17-28mm | 16-50mm | 28-200mm | 55-250mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/4 | f/4 |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E | Nikon Z | Sony E | L-Mount | Canon EF-S |
| Stabilization | true | true | false | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 1020 | 590 | 450 | 107 | 413 | 375 |
| AF Type | HSM | VXD linear motor | Stepping Motor | Autofocus | Autofocus | STM |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | telephoto |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Valoración social | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma Art 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art | 54.1 | 89 | 40.6 | 86 | 98.1 | 86.2 | 64.1 | 80.7 | 93.9 | 93 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 97.7 | 80.7 | 64.1 | 84 | 96.6 | 68.8 | 91 | 97.9 | 52.3 | 80.3 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare | 85.4 | 89 | 74.6 | 84 | 87.8 | 86.2 | 91 | 67.9 | 68 | 35 |
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 54.1 | 78.2 | 98.3 | 42.1 | 66.8 | 80 | 64.1 | 83.5 | 81.3 | 93 |
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare | 54.1 | 80.7 | 77 | 73.3 | 91.7 | 68.8 | 22.2 | 95.5 | 75.5 | 99.4 |
| Canon EF EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Compare | 85.4 | 67.4 | 66.3 | 45.5 | 74.4 | 68.8 | 45.4 | 92.3 | 81.3 | 93 |
Precio
Relación calidad-precio
Aquí está el truco: el rango de precios que vemos es una locura, desde $781 hasta cifras absurdas. Si lo encuentras por debajo de los $900, es un chollo absoluto. Por ese precio, no hay nada que le haga sombra en nitidez y estabilización. Pero si te acercas a los precios de un Sony G Master o un Canon L de segunda mano, la decisión se complica. Nuestro consejo: busca el mejor precio en Amazon, que suele ser donde aparece la ganga.
Amazon 2 ofertas Desde 173.662 JPY
Price History
Leer más
Resumen
El Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art es un objetivo que divide opiniones, y eso lo hace interesante. Por un lado, tienes una calidad óptica que está entre las mejores que hemos visto, con una nitidez central bestial. Por otro, cargas con más de un kilo de cristal y metal, y un sistema de enfoque automático que a veces decide tomarse un descanso. Si buscas la mejor calidad de imagen posible por menos dinero que una primera marca y no te importa lidiar con sus rarezas, este Sigma es un cañón. Pero no es para todo el mundo.
Preguntas frecuentes
Q: ¿Realmente necesito el dock USB de Sigma para este lente?
Mira, no es obligatorio, pero casi. Si tienes la suerte de que tu copia enfoque perfecta de fábrica, no lo necesitas. Pero como el AF es tan inconsistente, el dock es la única manera de actualizar el firmware y hacer microajustes para corregir problemas de front o back focus. Cómpralo junto con el lente y ahórrate dolores de cabeza.
Q: ¿Es demasiado pesado para viajar o para usarlo todo el día?
Sí, lo es. Con 1020g, se nota y mucho. Para un paseo turístico de 8 horas, te va a destrozar el cuello. Si la portabilidad es clave para ti, vete a por el Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2, que pesa la mitad. Este Sigma es más para sesiones de estudio o reportajes donde sabes que no vas a estar 12 horas de pie con él colgado.
Para quién no es adecuado
Si haces vídeo o necesitas un enfoque automático rápido, silencioso y 100% fiable para eventos, bodas o deportes, este no es tu lente. El ruido del AF en vídeo y su inconsistencia te van a sacar de quicio. Vete directo a por un Sony G Master nativo o el Tamron G2, que son mucho más fiables en ese aspecto.
Veredicto
El Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 Art es un objetivo para un tipo de fotógrafo muy concreto: el que prioriza la calidad de imagen por encima de todo y está dispuesto a cargar con el peso y a jugar con el dock USB para domar el AF. Si eres de los que disparan en estudio, paisaje o retrato pausado, te va a encantar. Si necesitas un AF infalible para eventos o vídeo, huye. Es una herramienta brillante pero con carácter, y no todo el mundo tiene la paciencia para domarla.
