Intel Pentium T7700 2-core LGA 775
The Core 2 Duo T7700's 2.4GHz clock speed and 4MB L2 cache delivered strong mobile performance for its era on the 65nm Merom architecture. Its 800MHz front-side bus provided a balanced platform for mainstream laptops, offering a solid efficiency score of 82/100. This processor is best for retro computing enthusiasts restoring period-correct 2007–2008 Socket P notebooks.
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
The Core 2 Duo T7700 scores 939 on PassMark, which is slow by modern standards, but owners rate it 5/5 and user sentiment sits in the 93rd percentile. It's a cheap, easy upgrade for old Socket P laptops that adds real responsiveness for basic tasks. Just keep expectations realistic, this is a 2007 chip, not a miracle worker.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- User sentiment in the 93rd percentile, owners genuinely love this chip 92nd
- 35W TDP keeps old laptops cool and quiet 69th
- 4MB L2 cache is generous for the era
- Easy drop-in upgrade for Socket P laptops
- 5/5 customer rating across 20 reviews
Desventajas
- 939 PassMark multi-thread score lands in the 24th percentile
- Single-thread performance in the 20th percentile, it's slow by modern standards
- Efficiency score only 27th percentile despite the low TDP
- No integrated graphics, relies on aging chipset GPUs
- Requires thermal paste, which isn't included
Opinión de los propietarios
The Word on the Street
Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo
ExclusivaSegún cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.
Basado en 11 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.
Las pruebas
Performance
Let's be honest about the numbers. A 939 multi-thread PassMark score is not impressive by modern standards, it's in the 24th percentile for multi-thread and 20th for single-thread. That means roughly 80% of CPUs in our database beat it. But context matters. If you're coming from a single-core Celeron M or a Pentium Dual-Core T2330, this T7700 with its 2.4GHz clock and 4MB L2 is a legitimate upgrade. The 800MHz FSB and 64-bit support mean it can handle Windows 10 in a pinch, though you'll want to keep expectations in check.
The 35W TDP is actually a bright spot for a chip this old. It's efficient enough to drop into most laptops without cooking the chassis, and the 291 million transistors on a 143mm² die were respectable for the era. The integrated graphics situation is nonexistent by modern standards, but these old laptops relied on chipset graphics anyway, so nobody's losing sleep over that.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Core 2 Duo |
| Model | T7700 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 14 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 2 |
| P-cores | 4 |
| Threads | 8 |
| Base Clock | 2400 |
| Boost Clock | 4200 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 939 |
| PassMark Single | 964 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2400 |
| Max Memory | 64 |
| ECC | No |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 775 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 |
| TDP | 65 |
| Unlocked | No |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
vs Competition
Stacking this against the competition in our database is almost unfair. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is in a completely different universe, with multi-thread scores that would make this T7700 look like a calculator. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 and the D&H Core i9 X-Series are similarly out of reach. But none of those chips fit in a 2007-era laptop. The real comparison is against what this T7700 replaces. Against a Core 2 Duo T5250 or T5450, the T7700's 2.4GHz clock and 4MB cache are a meaningful step up. The G.Skill Trident Z Neo isn't even a CPU, so that's a weird one in our competitor list. The point is, if you're comparing this to modern desktop chips, it loses every time. If you're comparing it to what's currently in your old laptop, it's often a solid win.
| Spec | Intel Pentium T7700 | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | SMC EPYC 9555P | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Dell Inspiron 7700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 8 | 64 | 16 | - | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 | 128 | 32 | - | 12 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 4200 | 5200 | 4400 | 4400 | - | 4700 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 8 | 96 | 256 | 22 | - | 12 |
| Tdp W | 65 | 120 | 360 | 165 | - | 15 |
| Socket | LGA 775 | AM5 | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA 2066 | - | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD 630 | AMD Radeon Graphics | - | - | - | Iris Xe 96EU |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Valoración social | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Pentium T7700 | 45.5 | 54.9 | 55.5 | 92.4 | 27.4 | 24.2 | 68.6 | 53.1 | 20.1 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare | 91.3 | 98.5 | 95.2 | 92.4 | 88.1 | 88.7 | 96.5 | 23.6 | 94.7 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.1 | 96.8 | 0 | 88.9 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.4 | 85.2 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X Compare | 88.6 | 62.6 | 81.4 | 0 | 73.8 | 84.2 | 70.6 | 17.5 | 73 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.2 | 20.4 | 17.9 | 0 | 65.7 | 96.9 | 0 | 6.5 | 98.2 |
| Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare | 61.1 | 69.8 | 71.3 | 0 | 99.4 | 64.5 | 25.3 | 3.7 | 81.4 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the map depending on where you shop. In the US, you're looking at $150 for a single listing, which feels steep for a chip this old. But European buyers have more options, with EUR prices ranging from EUR 224 to EUR 368 across four listings in Germany, Spain, France, and Italy. That's a EUR 144 spread, which is wild for the same processor. If you're in Europe, shop around, the cheapest listing is nearly 40% less than the most expensive. In Brazil it's BRL 1,609 and in Canada CAD 353. For what this chip does, which is revive an old laptop for basic tasks, the value proposition really depends on how much life you expect to get out of the machine. At $150 or EUR 224, it's a reasonable gamble. At EUR 368, you're approaching the cost of a used Chromebook that would run circles around it.
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 35.552 JPY
Price History
Leer más
Overview
The Intel Pentium LF80537GG0564M, which is really a Core 2 Duo T7700 in disguise, sits at a weird crossroads. It scores 939 on PassMark multi-thread and 964 single-thread, which puts it in the bottom quarter of our database for raw performance. But here's the thing: user sentiment lands in the 93rd percentile. People genuinely love this chip, and that's not something we see every day for a processor from 2007.
This is a 2.4GHz dual-core with 4MB of L2 cache and a 35W TDP on Socket P (the listing says 479, but that's the socket naming confusion Intel loved back then). It's not going to win any benchmark wars against a Ryzen 7 9800X3D, but that's not the point. The point is breathing life into an old laptop that's been collecting dust, and on that front, owners are nearly unanimous: it works, it's cheap, and it makes a real difference.
Common Questions
Q: Will this work in my laptop?
It depends on your socket and FSB. This T7700 uses Socket P (sometimes listed as 479) with an 800MHz FSB. If your laptop currently has a Core 2 Duo with the same socket and FSB speed, it should be a drop-in replacement. Several owners confirm it works in older Compaq and similar machines, but check your laptop's specs before buying.
Q: Is this a good upgrade from a single-core processor?
Yes, and that's the main use case. Moving from a single-core Celeron M or similar to this dual-core T7700 with 4MB L2 cache and 2.4GHz clock speed makes a real difference in everyday responsiveness. The 939 PassMark multi-thread score isn't impressive overall, but it's a big step up from the single-core chips these laptops shipped with.
Q: Do I need anything else to install this?
You'll need thermal paste, which isn't included. Several owners mention this in their reviews. You'll also want to make sure your laptop's BIOS supports the T7700, though most Socket P machines from that era do. A screwdriver set and some patience are the only other requirements.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building or buying anything remotely modern, skip this entirely. The 20th percentile single-thread score and 24th percentile multi-thread score mean it struggles with anything beyond basic tasks. The efficiency score of 27th percentile is also disappointing for a 35W chip, and the lack of integrated graphics means you're stuck with whatever ancient chipset GPU your laptop has. If you're spending more than EUR 250 or $150 on this, you're overpaying. At that point, a used Chromebook or budget laptop would serve you better. This chip is for one specific person: someone with an old Socket P laptop who wants to spend as little as possible to keep it running for basic web browsing and document work.
Verdict
The data tells a clear story: this is not a fast processor by any modern measure, but it's a beloved one. A 93rd percentile user sentiment score with a 5/5 rating across 20 reviews says people who buy this know exactly what they're getting and they're happy with it. The performance numbers are what they are, bottom quarter of the database, but the use case is so specific that raw benchmarks almost don't matter. If you have an old Socket P laptop that you want to squeeze another year or two out of, this T7700 is a proven, cheap, and reliable upgrade. Just don't expect it to do anything beyond web browsing, document editing, and light media playback.