AMD Epyc 9355P
The 32-core, 64-thread EPYC 9355P with a 4.4GHz boost and 256MB L3 cache delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, scoring 96,603 on PassMark. Its PCIe 5.0 support and DDR5 ECC memory make it a strong fit for dense server workloads, though its 280W TDP limits efficiency. Best for server administrators and data center operators running virtualization, database, or AI inference tasks that prioritize raw throughput over power savings.
Sin precio actual de tiendas
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
The EPYC 9355P is a 32-core server chip with best-in-class multi-thread performance and a 99th percentile PassMark score. It's expensive and power-hungry at 280W, but if you need raw throughput for servers or AI, it's worth it. Everyone else should look at cheaper, more efficient options.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- Top-tier multi-thread performance, 99th percentile in our database 99th
- Massive 256MB L3 cache for data-heavy workloads 98th
- Excellent AI and server scores 97th
- DDR5 ECC support and PCIe 5.0 for future-proofing 89th
Desventajas
- 280W TDP means real cooling and power costs
- Efficiency score is mediocre at 41.7 out of 100
- SP5 socket limits motherboard options
- Price is steep, around $5,000 USD
Las pruebas
Performance
The 9355P posts a 96,603 PassMark multi-core score, which puts it at the absolute top of the charts. That's 32 cores and 64 threads of Zen 5 on a 4nm process, backed by 256MB of L3 cache. Single-thread hits 3,747, which is strong but not the reason you buy this chip. AI workloads score in the 98th percentile, so LLM inference and similar tasks will fly. The weak spot is efficiency at 41.7 out of 100. A 280W TDP means you need serious cooling and a motherboard with an SP5 socket. It's a workstation or server part, not something you drop into a casual build.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | EPYC |
| Model | 9355P |
| Codename | Turin |
| Class | server |
| Process | 4 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 32 |
| P-cores | 32 |
| Threads | 64 |
| Base Clock | 3550 |
| Boost Clock | 4400 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 32 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 96603 |
| PassMark Single | 3747 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 6000 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | SP5 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 |
| TDP | 280 |
| Max Turbo Power | 300 |
| Unlocked | No |
vs Competition
Against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the 9355P wins on raw multi-thread throughput but loses on efficiency and single-thread snappiness. The Intel part is a desktop chip with a much lower power envelope, while the EPYC is a server workhorse. The other competitors in our list, like the HP Xeon and various Core i9 X-series parts, are older or more specialized. The 9355P's 97th percentile platform score means it has modern I/O and memory support that older Xeons can't match. If you need PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 ECC, this is the pick.
| Spec | AMD Epyc 9355P | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | SMC EPYC 9555P | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | HP Xeon P67080-B21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 32 | 24 | 32 | 64 | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 64 | 24 | 64 | 128 | 48 | 32 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 4400 | 5700 | 3500 | 4400 | 4000 | 3900 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 36 | 256 | 256 | 128 | 37.5 |
| Tdp W | 280 | 125 | 200 | 360 | 200 | 195 |
| Socket | SP5 | LGA 1851 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | AMD Socket SP5 | AMD Socket SP3 | LGA 4677 |
| Integrated Graphics | - | Intel Graphics | No | - | - | No |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Valoración social | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Epyc 9355P | 98.4 | 76.8 | 96.7 | 89.2 | 98.5 | 17.6 | 88.6 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.8 | 95.9 | 97 | 96.6 | 90.7 | 99.8 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 99.1 | 90.7 | 76.2 | 97.3 | 99.2 | 1.5 | 89.3 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 76.8 | 96.7 | 90.6 | 99.5 | 1.5 | 88.7 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.7 | 76.8 | 84 | 83.7 | 94.4 | 38.3 | 80.1 |
| HP Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.7 | 76.8 | 90.6 | 78 | 90.8 | 1.5 | 80.3 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
At roughly $5,000 USD, this is a serious investment. You're paying for top-tier multi-thread performance and a platform with PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 ECC. For a business running 24/7 server workloads, the cost makes sense if it replaces older, slower hardware. For a hobbyist or someone just gaming, it's overkill and the power draw alone will eat you alive. Value depends entirely on whether you can actually use 32 cores.
Leer más
Overview
The AMD EPYC 9355P is a 32-core Turin monster built for servers and heavy productivity. It's not cheap and it's not subtle, but it absolutely crushes multi-threaded work. Our database puts it at the 99th percentile for multi-thread performance, which is about as good as it gets right now.
Single-thread is no slouch either, landing in the top tier with a 4.4GHz boost. The catch is efficiency. It pulls 280W at base and up to 300W in turbo, so your power bill will notice. If you need raw throughput and don't care about watts, this thing delivers.
Common Questions
Q: Does the EPYC 9355P work in a standard desktop motherboard?
No, it requires an SP5 socket motherboard designed for EPYC 9004 and 9005 series processors. These are server and workstation boards, not standard consumer AM5 boards.
Q: What kind of cooling do I need for a 280W TDP chip?
You'll want a high-end air cooler or liquid cooling solution rated for at least 300W. Server chassis with strong airflow are ideal, and a quality thermal paste application is a must.
Q: Is the 9355P good for gaming?
Not really. Its single-thread score is decent but not exceptional, and the high power draw and server platform make it impractical for gaming. A consumer Ryzen or Core i9 would be a better fit.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need a quiet, efficient machine. The 280W TDP means constant fan noise and a hefty power bill. Also skip it if you're a gamer or casual user, because the single-thread performance, while good, isn't worth the platform cost. And if you don't have an SP5 motherboard already, the total platform price will sting even more.
Verdict
Buy this if you run a server, a render farm, or heavy AI workloads and need 32 cores of Zen 5 with ECC memory. It's a productivity beast with a 92.8 score in that category. Skip it if you're building a gaming PC or a quiet workstation. The power draw and price are just too much for anything less than serious parallel work.