AMD A Series AD6500OKHLBOX 4-core Socket FM2

★★★★☆ 3.6 (69)

The unlocked multiplier and 65W TDP on the FM2 socket allow for easy overclocking, while the integrated Radeon HD8570D graphics provide usable dual-graphics support without a discrete card. Its quad-core, 4.1GHz base clock design delivers competent mainstream computing at a budget-focused price point. This APU is best for cost-conscious builders assembling a basic home office PC or a low-power home theater system.

Cores 4
Threads 4
Boost Clock 3600 MHz
L3 Cache 6 MB
TDP 65 W
Socket Socket FM2
Integrated Graphics Radeon HD8570D
AMD A Series AD6500OKHLBOX 4-core Socket FM2 cpu
44 Puntuación global
Precio 24.944 JPY
También disponible en:

Resumen

The 30-Second Version

The AMD A8-6500 APU scores 5601 on PassMark multi-core and 2089 single-thread, landing in the 42nd and 58th percentiles respectively. The Radeon HD8570D iGPU is the real highlight at the 84th percentile for features. Users rate it 3.6/5 and praise the value, but the 4.1GHz boost spec is misleading since the base clock is actually 3.5GHz.

Pros & Cons

Ventajas

  • Radeon HD8570D iGPU lands in the 84th percentile for features 84th
  • 65W TDP keeps power draw and heat low 78th
  • PassMark single-thread score of 2089 beats the multi-thread percentile 69th
  • 4 cores and 4 threads handle everyday multitasking smoothly
  • User sentiment score of 85/100 with praise for value and reliability

Desventajas

  • PassMark multi-core score of 5601 is only 42nd percentile
  • Base clock is 3.5GHz, not the 4.1GHz boost speed implied in listings
  • Heatsink and fan not always included in the box
  • Customer rating of 3.6/5 reflects some disappointment on pricing and cooling
  • DDR3 memory support limits upgrade potential

Opinión de los propietarios

The Word on the Street

3.6/5 (69 reviews)
👍 Multiple owners report smooth HD video playback and light gaming thanks to the Radeon HD8570D integrated graphics.
👍 A common theme is that this chip is reliable and easy to install, making it a favorite for budget builds and HTPCs.
👎 Several buyers mention the base clock is 3.5GHz, not the 4.1GHz boost speed implied in product listings.

Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo

Exclusiva

Según cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.

La opinión de los propietarios se ha enfriado desde el lanzamiento
85/100Nuestro análisis de opinión con IAconfianza media · 13 fuentes · jun 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '13: 5.0★ · 2 opinionesQ4 '13: 5.0★ · 2 opinionesQ1 '14: 4.7★ · 3 opinionesQ2 '14: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ3 '14: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ1 '15: 5.0★ · 1 opiniónQ3 '21: 3.5★ · 2 opinionesQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 opinión22311121Q3 '13Q4 '13Q1 '14Q2 '14Q3 '14Q1 '15Q3 '21Q4 '24
Valoración mediaSatisfechos (4-5★)Insatisfechos (1-2★)Altura de la barra = número de opiniones

Basado en 13 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.

Las pruebas

Performance

The PassMark multi-core score of 5601 puts this chip in the 42nd percentile for multi-thread performance. That's about average, which sounds fine until you realize the comparison pool includes a lot of ancient hardware. The single-thread score of 2089 lands at the 58th percentile, so it's slightly better there. In plain English: this thing handles web browsing, office work, and HD video playback without complaint, but it's not going to win any rendering contests.

The integrated Radeon HD8570D is the star of the show. It's in the 84th percentile for features, and users consistently praise it for smooth HD playback and light gaming. The 4.1GHz boost clock is a bit misleading though. Multiple owners point out the base clock is actually 3.5GHz, not 4.1GHz as the boost spec implies. The 6MB of L3 cache and 1MB of L2 cache are modest, but they get the job done for basic tasks. The 65W TDP means you can run this thing in a tiny case without a beefy cooler.

Performance Percentiles

AI 50.3
Feature 83.7
Platform 43.9
User Sentiment 63.3
Efficiency 52.6
Multi Thread 44
Valoración social 68.9
Affordability 77.9
Single Thread 58.4

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand AMD
Series AMD A Series
Model AD6500OKHLBOX
Codename Skylake
Class desktop
Process 14

Cores & Clocks

Cores 4
P-cores 4
Threads 4
Base Clock 4100
Boost Clock 3600

Cache

L2 Cache 1
L3 Cache 6 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 5601
PassMark Single 2089

Memory

Memory Type DDR3
Max Speed 2133
Max Memory 64
ECC No

Platform & Power

Socket Socket FM2
PCIe 3
PCIe Lanes 16
TDP 65
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics Radeon HD8570D

vs Competition

Stacked against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K or the SMC EPYC 9555P, this AMD chip looks like a toy. Those are modern, high-end parts with multi-core scores that would embarrass the A8-6500's 5601. But that's not a fair fight. The real comparison is against other budget APUs and older Intel chips with integrated graphics. The A8-6500's Radeon HD8570D beats most Intel HD Graphics solutions from the same era, and the 65W TDP is lower than many competing quad-cores. The Dell Inspiron 7700 and D&H Core i9 parts are in a completely different league on CPU performance, but they also cost dramatically more and draw way more power. If you're building a cheap HTPC or a basic office machine, the A8-6500 holds its own. If you need real CPU muscle, look elsewhere.

Spec AMD A Series AD6500OKHLBOX Intel Core Ultra 9 285K SMC EPYC 9555P MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Dell Inspiron 7700 Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores 4 24 64 - 10 -
Threads 4 24 128 - 12 -
Boost Clock Mhz 3600 5700 4400 - 4700 -
L3 Cache Mb 6 36 256 - 12 -
Tdp W 65 125 360 - 15 -
Socket Socket FM2 LGA 1851 AMD Socket SP5 - Intel BGA 1744 -
Integrated Graphics Radeon HD8570D Intel Graphics - - Iris Xe 96EU -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Producto AIFeaturePlatformUser SentimentEfficiencyMulti ThreadValoración socialAffordabilitySingle Thread
AMD A Series AD6500OKHLBOX 50.383.743.963.352.64468.977.958.4
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.99678.797.296.490.318.299.9
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.496.7089.799.400.585.9
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare 85.820.717.5066.697.106.498.4
Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare 60.770.171.6099.564.4253.682.3
Empowered PC Ryzen 7 5700X Compare 63.920.717.5039.881.904085.7

Precio

Value & Pricing

There's no price listed in our database right now, which makes value tricky to pin down. The one listing we found is in Japan at JPY 24,944. That's not a number we can compare directly to other currencies, but the affordability score sits at the 78th percentile. Users consistently call this chip excellent value for money, especially for budget builds and HTPCs. The recurring theme in reviews is that you get a capable APU with solid integrated graphics for very little cash. The catch is that some listings don't include a heatsink or fan, so factor that into your total cost if you don't have a spare cooler lying around.

Desde 24.944 JPY 1 oferta en 1 tienda
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 24.944 JPY

Seguimos los precios de este producto desde el 13 jun 2026. El gráfico aparecerá cuando tengamos más datos.

Leer más

Overview

The AMD A8-6500 APU sits in a weird spot in 2024. It's a 14nm chip from the FM2 era with a PassMark multi-core score of 5601 and a single-thread score of 2089. Those numbers put it around the middle of the pack in our database, but that's not the whole story. The real draw here is the Radeon HD8570D integrated graphics, which lands in the 84th percentile for features. For a chip this old, that's genuinely impressive.

Users rate it 3.6 out of 5 stars across 69 reviews, and the sentiment score is a solid 85/100. People love it for budget builds and HTPCs. The 65W TDP keeps things cool and quiet, and the 4 cores with 4 threads handle everyday multitasking without breaking a sweat. Just don't expect it to crush modern games or heavy productivity workloads.

Common Questions

Q: Is the AMD A8-6500 good for gaming?

It can handle light gaming and older titles thanks to the Radeon HD8570D integrated graphics, which ranks in the 84th percentile for features. But the PassMark multi-core score of 5601 is only 42nd percentile, so don't expect modern AAA games to run well. Think indie games, esports titles at low settings, and older classics.

Q: Does the A8-6500 come with a heatsink and fan?

Not always. Several customer reviews mention that some listings don't include a cooler in the box. Check the specific listing before you buy, and budget for an aftermarket cooler if needed. The 65W TDP means even a basic cooler will work fine.

Q: What's the actual clock speed of the A8-6500?

The base clock is 3.5GHz, and the boost clock is 4.1GHz. Some listings imply 4.1GHz is the base speed, which is misleading. In practice, the chip will boost to 4.1GHz under light loads, but sustained all-core workloads will run closer to 3.5GHz.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this chip if you need real CPU performance. The PassMark multi-core score of 5601 puts it in the 42nd percentile, and the single-thread score of 2089 is only 58th percentile. That means heavy multitasking, video editing, or modern gaming will feel sluggish. The efficiency score of 45.3/100 and the server score of 31.1/100 are also weak spots. If you're building a machine for anything beyond basic productivity, HTPC duty, or light gaming, spend a bit more on a modern budget chip. The DDR3 memory support also limits future upgrades, so this is a dead-end platform for anyone hoping to grow their system over time.

Verdict

The AMD A8-6500 is a budget APU that still makes sense for a narrow set of use cases. The user sentiment score of 85/100 and the 84th percentile feature ranking tell the real story: people who buy this for HTPCs, light gaming, and everyday computing are happy. The 5601 PassMark multi-core score and 42nd percentile ranking mean it's not a workstation chip, and the misleading 4.1GHz boost spec is annoying. But if you find one cheap and you need a low-power chip with decent integrated graphics, this is a solid pick. Just make sure you have a cooler ready.

Usage Scores

General (43.7)AI/LLM (35.5)Budget (61.3)Gaming (44.8)Server (32.2)Efficiency (46.8)Productivity (44.5)
  • General43.7
  • AI/LLM35.5
  • Budget61.3
  • Gaming44.8
  • Server32.2
  • Efficiency46.8
  • Productivity44.5

Productos similares