Samsung SSD SATA III 2.5"
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The 870 QVO is the sensible sedan of SSDs, reliable and cheap, but don't expect sports car performance. Great for reading, terrible for heavy writing.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Maxes out the SATA III interface for sequential reads 95th
- Great value for adding a lot of storage 85th
- DRAM cache keeps everyday tasks feeling snappy 66th
- Easy drop-in upgrade for old laptops and desktops
Cons
- QLC NAND tanks under sustained write loads
- 360 TBW endurance is mediocre for heavy users
- 1-year warranty feels short compared to the EVO line
- Random write performance is nothing special
What owners think
The Word on the Street
The proof
Performance
On paper, the 560 MB/s read and 530 MB/s write speeds are exactly what you'd expect from a SATA III drive, it's basically maxing out the interface. The real story is the QLC NAND. For loading games, booting Windows, or general snappiness, it feels great. But the 88K random write IOPS put it in the middle of the pack, and if you try to move a huge 100GB file, you'll see the cache run out and speeds plummet. It's a reader's drive, not a writer's drive.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 1000 |
| Form Factor | 2.5" |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 560 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 530 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 98000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 88000 |
Hardware
| NAND | QLC |
| DRAM Cache | Yes |
| Controller | MKX |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 360 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1500000 |
| Warranty (years) | 1 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
| Hardware Encryption | Yes |
vs Competition
The 870 QVO's biggest rival is its own sibling, the 870 EVO. The EVO uses TLC NAND, which means better endurance and more consistent write speeds, but it costs more. If you're just storing games and media, the QVO is fine. If you're doing video editing or constant file transfers, spend the extra on the EVO. Against newer NVMe drives like the Crucial T710 or MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO, the QVO gets absolutely smoked on speed, but those require an M.2 slot, which older machines simply don't have. For SATA-only systems, this is still one of the better options.
| Spec | Samsung SSD | Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 | Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P | Crucial T710 | SanDisk Black SN850X WDBB9G0040BNC-WRSN | Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1TB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 560 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s |
| Nand Type | QLC | TLC | - | TLC | TLC | SLC |
| Dram Cache | true | true | true | false | true | true |
| Endurance | 360 TBW | 4000 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2800 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | Social Proof | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung SSD | 38.3 | 44.4 | 84.6 | 55.4 | 66.3 | 95.3 | 26.4 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare | 99.5 | 99 | 90.9 | 92.6 | 93.6 | 87.1 | 6.6 |
| Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850P Compare | 89 | 95.8 | 84.6 | 92.6 | 88.1 | 99.6 | 7 |
| Crucial T710 Compare | 99.1 | 99.2 | 85.7 | 92.6 | 86 | 77.4 | 10.9 |
| SanDisk Black SN850X WDBB9G0040BNC-WRSN Compare | 89 | 95.8 | 89.4 | 92.6 | 88.1 | 95.3 | 9.6 |
| Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU Compare | 98.2 | 98.5 | 97.4 | 92.6 | 75 | 56.9 | 8.7 |
Price
Value & Pricing
The value story here is a bit weird. In the US, prices swing wildly from USD 98 to USD 358 depending on the vendor, with Amazon showing the best deal at the low end. At USD 98, this is a no-brainer for a 1TB SSD. At USD 358, you're getting ripped off, go buy an NVMe drive instead. In Europe, the spread is tighter at EUR 376 to EUR 437, but honestly, those prices are absurd for a SATA drive in 2025. Shop around and don't pay a premium for the Samsung name.
Amazon 1 offer From ¥72,906
We started tracking prices for this product on Nov 13, 2026. The chart appears once we have more data.
Read more
Overview
The Samsung 870 QVO is the budget-friendly workhorse of the SATA SSD world. It's not going to win any speed contests against NVMe drives, but for breathing new life into an old laptop or adding a ton of cheap storage to a desktop, it's a solid pick. The one thing to know: this is a QLC drive, which means it's fantastic for reads and everyday use, but it will choke if you're constantly hammering it with massive write operations.
Common Questions
Q: Can I put this in my old HP laptop?
Almost certainly yes. If your laptop has a 2.5-inch SATA bay, which most older ones do, this drive will drop right in. It's a universal form factor, so you're good to go.
Q: What's the difference between the 870 QVO and the 870 EVO?
The QVO uses QLC NAND, which is cheaper but slower on sustained writes and has lower endurance. The EVO uses TLC NAND, which is more durable and consistent. For everyday use, you won't notice much difference. For heavy workloads, the EVO is worth the extra cash.
Q: Does it come with software to clone my old drive?
Yes, Samsung includes their Data Migration software, which makes cloning your existing Windows install pretty painless. It's one of the better free migration tools out there.
Who Should Skip This
If you're doing heavy video editing, running a database, or constantly moving massive files, this isn't your drive. The QLC NAND will slow to a crawl once the cache fills up, and the 360 TBW endurance rating means you'll wear it out faster than a TLC drive. Get the 870 EVO or a good NVMe drive instead.
Verdict
The Samsung 870 QVO is a solid, reliable SATA SSD for everyday use and bulk storage. It's not exciting, it's not fast by modern standards, but it does exactly what it promises: cheap, quiet, dependable storage. If you're upgrading an old laptop or need a big game library drive, buy it at the right price and don't look back.
Usage Scores
- Overall63.1
- Budget73.9
- Gaming49.4
- Laptop59.7
- Console25.6
- Portable16
- Workstation52.8