Sigma 853101
This 18-125mm zoom stands out for its built-in Optical Stabilizer, which compensates for camera shake and enables shutter speeds up to 4 stops slower. Its compact 450g build and 35cm minimum focusing distance across all focal lengths make it a versatile, lightweight travel companion. This lens is best for budget-conscious photographers who want a single, stabilized walkaround zoom for general outdoor and close-up shooting.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
A lightweight superzoom that's all about convenience and nothing about image quality. It's the lens equivalent of a Swiss Army knife with dull blades.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Incredibly versatile 18-125mm zoom range 95th
- Light and compact for a superzoom at 490g 71st
- Effective optical stabilization for static shots 70th
- Surprisingly good close-up performance
Cons
- Optical quality is a real weak spot, especially at the edges
- Slow f/3.8-5.6 aperture is useless in low light
- Build quality feels its age and budget roots
- Autofocus is noisy and middling by modern standards
The proof
Performance
What surprised us most is just how versatile this thing is, landing in the 95th percentile for versatility in our database. That massive 18-125mm range on an APS-C body covers everything from a useful wide angle to a solid telephoto reach, all without a lens swap. But that flexibility comes at a cost, and the optical score is a disappointing 21st percentile. Images are fine in the center, but the edges get soft, especially at the long end. It's a classic case of a superzoom doing its best, but physics is a tough boss.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 18 |
| Focal Length Max | 125 |
Aperture
| Min Aperture | f/3.8-5.6 |
Build
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.1 lbs |
vs Competition
Stacked against a modern kit lens like the Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS, the Sigma wins on sheer reach but loses badly on sharpness, autofocus speed, and compactness. The Sony is a pancake that lives on your camera. If you need a real upgrade in image quality and a constant aperture, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is in a different universe, though it's pricier and heavier. The Sigma's only real party trick is that 125mm long end, which the others simply can't touch.
| Spec | Sigma 853101 | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Nikon NIKKOR 20059 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Panasonic Lumix G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18mm f/2.8-4 | Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 18-125mm | 28-300mm | 18-55mm | 16-50mm | 8-18mm | 70-200mm |
| Max Aperture | - | f/4 | f/3.5 | f/3.5 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | - | Sony E | Nikon F | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds | Canon RF |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | false | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 490 | 590 | 205 | 107 | 313 | 1070 |
| AF Type | - | VXD linear motor | pulse stepping motor | Autofocus | 240-fps autofocus drive | Dual Nano USM |
| Lens Type | - | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | telephoto |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma 853101 | 53.9 | 69.9 | 35.3 | 12.2 | 17.6 | 70.9 | 95.2 | 34.4 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 97.7 | 83.6 | 63.1 | 83.2 | 96.3 | 70.9 | 97.9 | 79.4 |
| Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare | 84.7 | 81.4 | 83.8 | 95.4 | 54.7 | 82.8 | 82.8 | 92.3 |
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 53.9 | 81.4 | 98 | 41.5 | 66.5 | 82.8 | 83.4 | 92.3 |
| Panasonic Lumix G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18mm f/2.8-4 Compare | 53.9 | 86.7 | 83.7 | 35.4 | 93.5 | 88.3 | 75.2 | 79.4 |
| Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Compare | 93.2 | 90.6 | 36.1 | 30.5 | 89.8 | 88.3 | 79.3 | 96.4 |
Price
Value & Pricing
For the used price these go for, it's a tempting impulse buy, but we'd say save your cash. The optical performance is a real letdown on modern high-resolution sensors. You can get a much sharper, albeit shorter, kit lens for similar money that won't make you question your camera's focusing abilities.
Amazon 1 offer From ¥50,824
Price History
Read more
Overview
The Sigma 18-125mm is a classic jack-of-all-trades zoom that's been kicking around for ages, and honestly, its age shows. The one thing to know is that you're trading modern sharpness and speed for a massive zoom range in a lightweight package. It's the lens you grab when you just don't want to swap glass, and for a walkaround on a sunny day, that's a real pleasure. But don't expect it to wow you with clinical sharpness or low-light prowess.
At 490g, it's surprisingly light for the reach it gives you, and the close-focusing ability is a neat bonus for detail shots. The optical stabilization, which Sigma calls OS, is a genuine help for static subjects, claiming about 4 stops of compensation. But the slow, variable f/3.8-5.6 aperture means you'll be leaning on that OS or cranking your ISO the moment the sun dips behind a cloud. It's a lens built for convenience, not for pixel-peeping.
Common Questions
Q: Is this lens sharp enough for a 24-megapixel sensor?
Barely. In the center it's passable, but the edges and corners will look soft and mushy, especially past 70mm. You're leaving a lot of your sensor's resolution on the table with this glass.
Q: Will the autofocus keep up with my kids or pets running around?
Nope, not a chance. The AF motor is an older, noisier design and it will hunt, especially in anything but bright light. This is a lens for posed portraits and landscapes, not action.
Q: Does the optical stabilization work for video?
It helps a bit with handheld static shots, but it's an older system and you'll still see jitter and wobble if you're moving. Don't expect smooth gimbal-like footage, and the noisy AF will ruin your audio if you use the internal mic.
Who Should Skip This
If you're looking for sharp, modern image quality, this isn't it. Go get a basic 18-55mm kit lens from your camera brand instead. It will be sharper, focus faster and more quietly, and won't leave you disappointed every time you zoom in on a photo.
Verdict
We can't recommend the Sigma 18-125mm unless you find one for pocket change and absolutely need a single-lens solution for a vintage DSLR. It's a relic from a time when superzooms were all about convenience, and image quality took a backseat. For any modern camera, a basic kit lens will run circles around it in sharpness and focusing, and you can crop in to make up for some of the lost reach. This one's for the nostalgia shelf, not your camera bag.