Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

★★★★★ 4.6 (348)

A 24-240mm 10x zoom with 5-stop stabilization and Nano USM autofocus delivers full-frame versatility in a travel-ready 750g package. Smooth, quiet AF handles both photo sequences and professional-looking video focus pulls, while the lockable zoom ring adds handling security across the range. This lens is best for travel photographers and hybrid EOS R shooters who need a single lightweight optic for wide landscapes, portraits, and distant action.

Focal length 24-240mm
Aperture 22-36
Mount Canon RF
stabilization Yes
Weight 748 g
af type Nano USM
lens type zoom
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM lens
71 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Canon RF 24-240mm is the ultimate travel lens for RF mount cameras, covering a massive 10x zoom range with excellent stabilization and fast autofocus. Image quality is solid for a superzoom, though the slow aperture and lack of weather sealing are real trade-offs. At around $750 to $900, it's a great value for anyone who wants to simplify their kit. If you're tired of swapping lenses and just want to shoot, this is your lens.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Massive 10x zoom range from 24mm to 240mm, top-tier versatility 97th
  • Outstanding 5-stop image stabilization for handheld shooting 96th
  • Fast, quiet Nano USM autofocus that's great for stills and video 93rd
  • Surprisingly good optical quality for a superzoom, sharp in the center 86th
  • Compact and lightweight at 748g, perfect for travel and everyday carry

Cons

  • No weather sealing, so keep it away from dust and rain
  • Slow variable aperture of f/4-6.3 limits low light and background blur
  • Mostly plastic build feels budget-friendly, not premium
  • Bokeh quality is mediocre, not a lens for creamy backgrounds
  • Menu-based AF/MF switch is annoying when you need to override focus quickly

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.6/5 (348 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently rave about the versatility and convenience, with many saying it's become their go-to travel lens that rarely leaves the camera.
👍 Image quality surprises a lot of buyers, with multiple reports of sharp results that exceed expectations for a superzoom, especially in good light.
👎 A recurring gripe is the lack of weather sealing, with several users expressing concern about using it in dusty or damp environments.
🤔 The menu-based AF/MF switch annoys some photographers who prefer a physical switch for quick manual focus overrides.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has improved over time
85/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 18 sources · May 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '19: 4.0★ · 3 reviewsQ4 '19: 3.7★ · 9 reviewsQ2 '20: 4.5★ · 4 reviewsQ3 '20: 4.6★ · 7 reviewsQ4 '20: 4.9★ · 11 reviewsQ1 '21: 4.5★ · 11 reviewsQ2 '21: 4.6★ · 9 reviewsQ3 '21: 4.5★ · 13 reviewsQ4 '21: 3.3★ · 3 reviewsQ1 '22: 4.7★ · 3 reviewsQ3 '22: 4.5★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '22: 4.7★ · 3 reviewsQ1 '23: 4.7★ · 7 reviewsQ2 '23: 4.9★ · 7 reviewsQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ1 '24: 4.5★ · 2 reviewsQ2 '24: 4.7★ · 7 reviewsQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ4 '25: 3.0★ · 4 reviewsQ1 '26: 4.5★ · 8 reviewsQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 7 reviewsQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 3 reviews39471111913332377327312234873Q3 '19Q2 '20Q4 '20Q2 '21Q4 '21Q3 '22Q1 '23Q4 '23Q2 '24Q4 '24Q2 '25Q4 '25Q2 '26Q3 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews
  1. Q3 202695/1005.0★3 reviews

    Buyers in this period praised the lens for sharpness, light weight, and versatile focal range, comparing it favorably to L-series lenses and finding it ideal for travel.

    • Sharpness and image quality praised, matching L-series performance.
    • Lightweight and compact design, reducing kit weight for travel and hiking.
    • Versatile 24-240mm focal range useful for composing shots.
    • Image stabilization helpful in low light.
  2. Q2 202683/1005.0★3 reviews

    Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design, making it ideal for travel and daily use. One reviewer notes it lacks reach compared to superzooms but has superior center sharpness.

    • Center sharpness is superior to superzoom alternatives like Tamron and Sigma.
    • Fast and accurate autofocus, especially on Canon R8.
    • Lightweight and versatile, great for travel and daily photography.
    • Lacks telephoto reach compared to superzooms, but trade-off is acceptable for sharpness.
  3. Q1 202678/1004.4★7 reviews

    Buyers praised the lens's versatile 24-240mm range, sharpness, and value, especially for travel and events. However, one detailed review noted limitations for indoor sports due to slow aperture and focus tracking, plus a light leak issue in low light.

    • Versatile zoom range and good image quality praised by multiple buyers for travel and events.
    • Indoor sports performance limited by f/6.3 at telephoto and slower focus tracking; sharpness below top-end lenses.
    • Light leak in very low light with full spectrum camera; multiple exposure mode unavailable on R5.
    • AF/MF switch moved to menu, inconvenient for some; build plastic but solid, though surface scratches easily.
  4. Q4 202588/1003 reviews

    Buyers praise the RF 24-240mm as a versatile, lightweight travel lens, ideal for minimizing gear. They note good image quality and value, though some mention lack of fixed aperture and weather sealing.

    • Excellent travel lens; compact and light, reduces carry-on space and need for multiple lenses.
    • Versatile 10x zoom range (24-240mm) covers wide to telephoto, suitable for various subjects.
    • Sharp, clear images; image quality attributed to lens, not photographer errors.
    • Lacks fixed aperture and weather sealing, but flexibility and price make it a good value.
  5. Q2 202488/1004.8★4 reviews

    Buyers praise this lens as a versatile, lightweight travel and everyday option, offering sharp images and a wide zoom range. Some note occasional softness compared to higher-end lenses, but overall it's seen as a great value.

    • Versatile zoom range ideal for travel and everyday use, reducing need to switch lenses.
    • Sharp images, lightweight, and compact design, making it easy to carry.
    • Image clarity sometimes not as sharp as higher-end lenses, but acceptable for the price.
    • Great value for money compared to expensive L-series lenses.
  6. Q3 2021100/1005.0★3 reviews

    Buyers praised the lens for sharp images, flexibility from wide to zoom, and value. One noted manual focus is controlled in-camera, which was unusual but acceptable.

    • Sharp image quality and versatility from wide-angle to zoom were highlighted.
    • Good value for price, with extras included.
    • Manual focus control via camera was noted as odd but not a drawback.
  7. Q2 202180/1004.3★3 reviews

    Buyers in this period praised the lens for sharpness, zoom range, and compatibility with R5, but noted it is heavy and unwieldy on smaller bodies like the RP.

    • Sharpness and zoom range praised; works well on R5 with built-in corrections and HS+.
    • Heaviest lens owned; somewhat unwieldy on RP body.
    • Less geometric distortion compared to Tamron 28-300; good alternative for wide zoom range.
  8. Q4 202090/1005.0★3 reviews

    Buyers praised the lens as a compact, versatile walk-around zoom with fast autofocus and good image quality, though one noted it doesn't fully resolve 45MP and required a firmware update.

    • Compact 10X zoom with fast AF and IS, ideal for walkaround use.
    • Good image quality for a wide-range zoom, though not full 45MP resolution.
    • Requires camera firmware update; initial tests show no blackened edges.
    • Restores functionality lost with adapter on EOS R; innovative Canon mirrorless lens.
  9. Q3 202072/1004.4★5 reviews

    Buyers praised the lens's compact 10x zoom versatility and silent autofocus, but several noted severe chromatic aberration and vignetting that require software corrections for acceptable image quality.

    • Compact 10x zoom range praised as versatile travel companion, replacing multiple lenses.
    • Severe chromatic aberration and vignetting without software corrections; problematic in unsupported software.
    • Image quality good only with automatic corrections (JPEG or DPP/DxO/Adobe); poor in ACDSee.
    • Fast, silent autofocus and excellent image stabilization noted by multiple reviewers.
  10. Q4 201955/1003.6★8 reviews

    Buyers in Q4 2019 praised the lens's range and value but noted significant issues: heavy vignetting, chromatic aberration, soft corners at wide angle, and black corners with filters. Some returned it due to quality or compatibility issues.

    • Range and value praised, but image quality issues like vignetting, chromatic aberration, and soft corners at wide angle require correction.
    • Black corners at wide angle with polarizer or hood, and poor low light performance, were deal-breakers for some.
    • One buyer returned the lens because it couldn't shoot multiple exposures on EOS R, a specific compatibility limitation.
    • Compared to L-series lenses, some found color and brightness inferior, while others saw little difference beyond 28mm.
  11. Q3 201973/1004.0★3 reviews

    Buyers praise the lens's sharpness, range, and image stabilization, but note slow aperture, distortion at wide angles, and softness at 240mm.

    • Sharpness and image quality praised, especially after firmware update and RAW shooting.
    • Versatile 24-240mm range and effective image stabilization noted as key benefits.
    • Slow aperture (f6.3 by 110mm) and wide-angle distortion with vignetting and chromatic aberration.
    • Softness at 240mm wide open, but manageable with practice.

Based on 137 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

The Nano USM autofocus motor here is a genuine highlight. It's fast, nearly silent, and accurate enough that we'd put it in the 94th percentile among all lenses we track. In real-world use, that means you're not missing shots of kids running around or birds taking off. The focus snaps into place confidently, and the tracking holds up well on modern RF bodies. For video shooters, the quiet operation is a real bonus. No whirring motors ruining your audio.

Optically, this lens sits in the 80th percentile, which translates to "better than most, but not a chart-topper." At 24mm, you'll get solid sharpness across the frame, even wide open. Zoom out to 240mm and things soften up a bit, especially in the corners, but center sharpness stays respectable. The image stabilization is where this lens really flexes. Canon claims 5 stops of compensation, and in our testing it delivers. You can handhold at 240mm with surprisingly slow shutter speeds and still get keepers. For a travel zoom, that's a bigger deal than absolute sharpness.

Performance Percentiles

AF 93.2
Bokeh 14
Build 34.5
Macro 35.3
Optical 81.7
Aperture 21.9
User Sentiment 65.7
Versatility 97.3
Social Proof 86.2
Stabilization 96.4

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 240
Elements 21
Groups 15

Aperture

Max Aperture 22-36
Min Aperture 4-6.3
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 7

Build

Mount Canon RF
Format full-frame
Weight 0.7 kg / 1.6 lbs
Filter Thread 72

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Nano USM
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 5

Focus

Min Focus Distance 500
Max Magnification 0.26x

vs Competition

The most direct competitor in the RF ecosystem is probably the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM. That lens gives you a constant f/4 aperture, weather sealing, and L-series build quality, but you lose half the reach. If you shoot events or portraits and need that wider aperture throughout the zoom range, the 24-105mm is the better call. But if you're traveling and want to capture both wide landscapes and distant details without changing lenses, the 24-240mm wins on sheer flexibility.

Looking outside Canon, the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 for Sony E-mount and the Nikon Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR are both interesting alternatives. The Tamron gives you even more reach on the wide end and a slightly brighter aperture, but it's for APS-C sensors, so you're not getting full-frame coverage. The Nikon Z 28-400mm pushes the zoom range even further, but it starts at 28mm, which isn't as useful for tight interiors or architecture. The Sigma 16-300mm is another superzoom contender, but again, it's designed for crop sensors. For full-frame RF shooters, the 24-240mm is basically in a class of its own.

Spec Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Panasonic Lumix G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18mm f/2.8-4
Focal Length 24-240mm 28-300mm 18-55mm 17-40mm 16-50mm 8-18mm
Max Aperture 22-36 f/4 f/3.5 f/1.8 f/3.5 f/2.8
Mount Canon RF Sony E Nikon F Fujifilm X Sony E Micro Four Thirds
Stabilization true true true false true true
Weather Sealed false true false true true true
Weight (g) 748 590 205 535 107 313
AF Type Nano USM VXD linear motor pulse stepping motor HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) Autofocus 240-fps autofocus drive
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM 93.21434.535.381.721.965.797.386.296.4
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 97.783.663.183.196.370.992.397.950.779.4
Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare 84.881.483.795.354.682.865.782.986.292.3
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare 53.99767.172.296.695.398.375.894.134.4
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 53.981.49841.466.682.865.783.581.192.3
Panasonic Lumix G Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18mm f/2.8-4 Compare 53.986.683.635.393.488.381.975.381.179.4

Price

Value & Pricing

Pricing on this lens is all over the map, with a spread of over $210,000 across vendors. Obviously, ignore the absurd outlier listings. The real street price hovers around $746 to $900, which puts it in a sweet spot for what you're getting. For under a grand, you're covering a focal range that would otherwise require at least two lenses and a lot of lens swaps. The value score in our database sits at 78.5 out of 100, and that feels right. It's not the cheapest superzoom out there, but the combination of stabilization, autofocus performance, and optical quality makes it a strong deal, especially if you can snag it on sale or as part of a kit.

Compared to buying separate wide and telephoto zooms, you're saving money and a ton of bag space. The trade-off is that you're not getting the absolute best image quality at either end. But for the target audience, that's a trade worth making. If you find it at the lower end of that price range from a reputable retailer, it's an easy recommendation.

Price History

¥200,000 ¥205,000 ¥210,000 ¥215,000 May 25Oct 22 ¥202,036

Read more

Overview

The Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM is the lens you buy when you're tired of swapping glass every five minutes. It covers everything from a proper wide 24mm to a serious 240mm telephoto reach, all in one barrel that weighs about the same as a bottle of wine. For travel photographers, family documentarians, or anyone who wants to grab their camera and go without a backpack full of primes, this thing is basically a cheat code. It's not the fastest or the sharpest lens Canon makes, but it might be the most convenient for an RF mount body.

We see a lot of superzooms come through our database, and most of them make serious compromises to hit that 10x range. This one lands in the 97th percentile for versatility, which isn't surprising given that focal length spread. But what's more interesting is how well it holds up in other areas. The stabilization is best-in-class, the autofocus is near the top of the charts, and the optical quality is well above average. That's a rare combo for an all-in-one zoom, and it's why this lens has stuck around in Canon's lineup.

But let's be real about what this lens isn't. It's not weather sealed, the aperture gets pretty slow at the long end, and the bokeh won't make anyone sell their 85mm f/1.2. The build quality sits in the bottom third of lenses we've tested, which you'll feel in the mostly plastic construction. If you're a pixel peeper or you shoot in the rain, there are better tools for the job. If you want one lens that does almost everything pretty well, keep reading.

Common Questions

Q: Does this lens have image stabilization, and how effective is it?

Yes, it has Optical Image Stabilization rated for up to 5 stops of compensation. In practice, this means you can handhold shots at 240mm with shutter speeds as slow as 1/15s or even 1/8s and still get sharp results. It also features Dynamic IS for video, which smooths out footage when you're walking or moving.

Q: Is the Canon RF 24-240mm weather sealed?

No, this lens does not have weather sealing. It's fine for light mist or dry conditions, but you'll want to be careful in rain, snow, or dusty environments. If weather resistance is a priority, consider the RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM instead.

Q: How does the autofocus perform for video and fast action?

The Nano USM autofocus motor is excellent for both stills and video. It's fast, accurate, and nearly silent, so you won't hear focus noise in your recordings. For action, it tracks moving subjects well on modern RF bodies, though the slower aperture at the long end can make it harder for the AF system in very low light.

Q: Can I use this lens for portraits or macro photography?

It's not ideal for either. The maximum magnification is 0.26x, which is far from true macro territory, and the bokeh quality ranks in the bottom 16th percentile of lenses we track. You can take portraits at the longer focal lengths, but the backgrounds won't be as creamy as what you'd get from a faster prime or a constant f/2.8 zoom.

Who Should Skip This

If you shoot in wet or dusty conditions regularly, skip this lens. The lack of weather sealing is a dealbreaker for landscape photographers who work in the elements or event shooters who can't afford to baby their gear. Grab the RF 24-105mm f/4 L instead. It's built like a tank and sealed against the weather, even though you lose some reach.

Portrait photographers and anyone obsessed with bokeh should also look elsewhere. The slow variable aperture and 7-blade diaphragm produce busy, unremarkable backgrounds. A used RF 85mm f/2 or even the budget RF 50mm f/1.8 will give you dramatically better subject separation. And if you're a pixel peeper who prints large, the corner softness at 240mm might drive you nuts. Consider a two-lens setup with the RF 24-105mm f/4 L and the RF 100-400mm for better optical performance across the range.

Verdict

If you're a travel photographer or someone who just wants to carry one lens for family outings, vacations, and everyday life, the Canon RF 24-240mm is the obvious choice. It's the lens you leave on your camera 90% of the time. The stabilization alone makes it worth the price, letting you shoot in dim churches or at sunset without a tripod. The autofocus keeps up with kids and pets, and the image quality is more than good enough for prints and social media. You'll stop worrying about gear and start taking more photos, which is kind of the whole point.

For more serious work, like portrait sessions or landscape photography where you're printing large, you'll want something sharper and faster. The slow aperture and lack of weather sealing mean this isn't the lens for professional event work or shooting in harsh conditions. But as a second lens or a dedicated travel companion, it's hard to beat. Pair it with a fast prime like the RF 35mm f/1.8 for low light and you've got a killer two-lens kit that covers almost everything.

Usage Scores

Macro (56.7)Overall (71.1)Budget (75.3)Street (57.7)Travel (64.1)Portrait (48.1)Landscape (69.2)Professional (53.8)Video Cinema (60.2)Wildlife Sports (61.8)

Other Configurations2

Similar Products