Team Group CX2 256GB SATA III 2.5"
The 256GB SATA III drive hits 520 MB/s reads and 430 MB/s writes using TLC NAND with SLC caching, making it four times faster than a mechanical hard drive. Its shock resistance up to 1500G/0.5ms and ECC error correction add durability and data reliability for everyday use. Best for beginners upgrading an older laptop or desktop from an HDD, where budget matters more than portability.
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile) 95th
- Strong affordability (85th percentile) 85th
- Strong endurance (68th percentile) 68th
Nachteile
- Below average speed (16th percentile)
- Below average capacity (18th percentile)
- Below average random (23rd percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 6 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Drive
| Capacity | 256 |
| Form Factor | 2.5" |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 520 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 430 |
Hardware
| NAND | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 80 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1000000 |
| Warranty (years) | 3 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Team Group CX2 | Samsung 9100 PRO | Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 | Western Digital WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE | Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 | Crucial T500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 256GB | 4TB | 4TB | 8TB | 4TB | 2TB |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 520 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s |
| Nand Type | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | true | false | true |
| Endurance | 80 TBW | 2400 TBW | 4000 TBW | 4800 TBW | 2400 TBW | 1200 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team Group CX2 | 16.2 | 22.6 | 53.7 | 17.8 | 68.2 | 95.3 | 84.6 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.1 | 99.8 | 99.6 | 92.6 | 85.9 | 99.6 | 5.3 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare | 99.4 | 99 | 90.9 | 92.6 | 93.5 | 87.1 | 6.5 |
| Western Digital WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE Compare | 88.9 | 96.3 | 93.9 | 98.1 | 88.1 | 95.3 | 3.7 |
| Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare | 99 | 99.1 | 89.4 | 92.6 | 85.9 | 77.4 | 10.9 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 93.9 | 96.9 | 98.8 | 78.6 | 83 | 95.3 | 19.3 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt40.9
- Budget84.1
- Gaming24.9
- Laptop37.6
- Console12.2
- Portable9.3
- Workstation35.4
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
