Rokinon Series II 85mm f/1.4 85mm

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

1. Q2 202685/1005.0★3 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens condition, packaging, fast shipping, and communication from Adorama. Overall satisfaction was high.

   • 👍Lens arrived in great condition, looking almost brand new.
   • 👍Fast shipping with helpful email updates.
   • 👍Excellent packaging ensuring safe delivery.
   • 👍High overall satisfaction with Adorama as a seller.
2. Q4 202267/1003 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for its value, sharpness, and fast autofocus, but one user noted poor star performance for astrophotography.

   • 👍Great value for the price, with fast autofocus and sharp image quality.
   • 🤔Works well for general use but may not suit extreme astrophotography needs.
   • 👍A cheaper alternative to Canon's autofocus equivalent for manual focus users.
   • 👎Poor star performance on full-frame and APS-C cameras for astrophotography.
3. Q3 202275/1004 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and value, but one reported a confusing manual focus behavior on a Nikon D750.

   • 👍Sharp center and smooth bokeh at a low price point.
   • 👍Well-built with long, dampened focus throw; good at f2.8.
   • 👍Excellent color rendition and sharpness for portrait photography.
   • 👎Focus-by-wire may not hold preset focus after standby timer expires on Nikon D750.
4. Q2 202260/1004.0★5 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for its value, fast AF, and portability, but one reviewer highlighted a persistent flaw: the lens fails to communicate focal length to the camera, requiring manual setup.

   • 👍Great value, fast autofocus, and light weight for street photography.
   • 👍Excellent for portraits and telephoto street shots.
   • 👎Lens does not transmit focal length to camera, breaking SteadyShot and EXIF.
   • 👎Manufacturer refuses to fix the focal length bug despite years of complaints.
5. Q1 202267/1003.8★9 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised image quality and value, but some reported early failure or focus issues.

   • 👍Excellent image quality and sharpness wide open at f/1.4.
   • 👍Great value for money compared to first-party lenses.
   • 👎One lens stopped working after three weeks.
   • 👎Manual focus difficult to achieve consistently; one buyer returned it.
6. Q4 202188/1004.8★9 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised the lens for its value, sharpness, and build quality. Some noted minor issues like focus hunting and wish for faster aperture.

   • 👍Great value for the price, often compared favorably to Canon equivalents.
   • 👍Sharp images with beautiful bokeh and low distortion.
   • 🤔Some users experienced focus hunting, but firmware updates may fix it.
   • 👎Wish for faster aperture (f/1.8 or f/2.0) on the 14mm lens.
7. Q3 202183/1004.8★6 Bewertungen

   Buyers praised this lens for astrophotography, sharpness, fast focus, and value. One review was mistakenly rated 0 stars but was positive.

   • 👍Excellent for astrophotography and night photography
   • 👍Sharp image quality and fast autofocus
   • 👍Great value for the price
   • 👍Impressive bokeh quality
8. Q2 2021100/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

   All four reviews are highly positive, praising sharpness, autofocus, low-light performance, and value. One notes a short minimum focus distance but still recommends the lens.

   • 👍Sharpness and image quality are excellent.
   • 👍Autofocus is quick, accurate, and snappy.
   • 👍Great value for the price, especially compared to competitors.
   • 🤔Minimum focus distance is short but not a dealbreaker for most.
9. Q1 202193/1004.5★11 Bewertungen

   Buyers praise the lens for excellent image quality, sharpness, and value. Autofocus is fast and quiet, though slightly slow for movement. Some note it is heavy and large.

   • 👍Excellent image quality and sharpness, comparable to more expensive lenses.
   • 👍Great value for money, offering high performance at a low price.
   • 🤔Autofocus is fast and quiet but can be slow for moving subjects.
   • 🤔Lens is heavy and large, but image quality compensates.
10. Q3 202067/1004.0★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens as a great value and excellent for portraits, but one returned it due to insufficient sharpness compared to a Samyang version.

    • 👍Great value at half the price of Sony native lens.
    • 👍Excellent portrait lens for Nikon.
    • 👎Sharpness not meeting expectations; returned.
    • 🤔Rokinon version differs from Samyang despite claims of sameness.
11. Q2 202095/1004.8★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers in this period praised the lens as a game-changer for creative wide-angle photography, though one noted CA and no VR.

    • 👍Game-changing wide-angle creative tool
    • 👍Great for portraits and pairs well with high-end bodies
    • 🤔Chromatic aberration present but easily corrected
    • 👎No VR, requires higher f-stop and avoids direct sun
12. Q1 202090/1004.8★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, build quality, and close focus. One notes the hood doesn't attach; another mentions manual focus is required.

    • 👍Sharp image quality and premium build.
    • 👍Excellent close focus for flowers and small subjects.
    • 🤔Hood attachment issue; manual focus may be unexpected.
    • 👍Integrates well with Canon AF and metering.
13. Q4 2019100/1005.0★6 Bewertungen

    All reviews are 5-star, praising the lens for its sharpness, build quality, and performance on various cameras. It is highly recommended for portraits.

    • 👍Excellent image quality and sharpness.
    • 👍Great build quality and autofocus performance.
    • 👍Versatile for both DSLR and mirrorless cameras.
    • 👍Ideal for portrait photography with beautiful bokeh.
14. Q3 2019100/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers in Q3 2019 praised the lens for its exceptional bokeh, ideal 85mm focal length for portraits, and solid build quality.

    • 👍Exceptional bokeh quality, described as 'ridiculous' and 'crazy'.
    • 👍Ideal 85mm focal length for in-room portraits and framing.
    • 👍Solid build quality, built like a pro lens.
    • 👍Great value, especially when bundled with lens dock.
15. Q2 201987/1004.8★9 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise sharpness, build quality, and value for portraits and astrophotography. One notes poor low-light autofocus compared to a cheaper Sony lens.

    • 👍Sharp image quality, corner to corner, throughout aperture range.
    • 👍Excellent value for money, especially for portrait and astro work.
    • 👍Solid build quality and good balance on camera body.
    • 👎Low light autofocus performance is tragic compared to cheaper Sony 85mm f/1.8.
16. Q4 201896/1004.8★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens for its sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and excellent portrait rendering. It is considered a bargain and a favorite for weddings.

    • 👍Sharpness and bokeh are outstanding, even at f/1.4.
    • 👍Excellent for portraits, with smooth skin tones and color.
    • 👍Great value for the price; a must-have in a kit.
    • 🤔Manual focus can be tricky, but not an issue for most users.
17. Q3 201880/1004.6★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness and build quality, but one noted a compatibility issue with micro 4/3 cameras.

    • 👍Sharp image quality and fast aperture praised.
    • 👍Solid build and classic portrait lens reputation.
    • 🤔Compatibility issue: full-frame lens crops on micro 4/3 sensors.
    • 👍Easy to focus and great addition to photography kit.
18. Q2 201882/1004.5★11 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens for sharpness, low-light performance, and value, though some note manual focus limitations and one disappointment with macro use.

    • 👍Exceptional sharpness and clarity, especially edge-to-edge and in low light.
    • 👍Great value for money, outperforming or matching more expensive L-series lenses.
    • 🤔Manual focus requires patience; not ideal for fast-moving subjects.
    • 👎One buyer disappointed with macro performance, expecting similarity to Canon 100mm.
19. Q1 201888/1004.6★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, value, and fast autofocus, with minor notes on barrel distortion correctable in software.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality are excellent, especially after lens correction.
    • 👍Great value for the price compared to major brand lenses.
    • 👍Fast and accurate autofocus, good low-light performance.
    • 🤔Some barrel distortion and edge softness wide open, correctable in Lightroom.
20. Q4 2017100/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers in Q4 2017 praised the lens for its exceptional build quality, sharpness at f1.4, and ease of focus, with no negative feedback.

    • 👍Excellent build quality and packaging impressed users.
    • 👍Sharp images even at f1.4 aperture.
    • 👍Easy to focus and good value for the price.
    • 👍No reliability or defect issues reported.
21. Q2 201789/1004.7★9 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and build quality, especially for portraits. Manual focus is a limitation for moving subjects.

    • 👍Sharpness and bokeh are consistently praised as outstanding.
    • 👍Build quality is solid with a satisfying weight.
    • 🤔Manual focus is loved for precision but slows down action shots.
    • 👎Lens is prone to flare without the hood; colors slightly warm.
22. Q1 201796/1004.8★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the fast and sharp autofocus, calling it an excellent upgrade from older models. One notes slower low-light performance but still prefers it over a Canon competitor.

    • 👍Fast and sharp autofocus is highly praised, especially on D810.
    • 👍Excellent upgrade from older 85mm f/1.4D lens.
    • 👍Creamy bokeh and amazing low-light performance.
    • 🤔One review mentions slower low-light performance but still favorable.
23. Q4 201680/1004.6★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and value versus native lenses. A few noted autofocus issues and softness wide open.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality praised, especially on FX bodies.
    • 👍Bokeh and color rendering described as beautiful and superb.
    • 👍Great value compared to more expensive native lenses.
    • 👎Autofocus issues and softness wide open reported by some users.
24. Q3 201688/1004.8★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and value, noting full-frame compatibility and ease of use for manual focus. Minor complaints included chromatic aberration at wide apertures and close focus limitations.

    • 👍Sharpness and bokeh quality are excellent, especially at f/2.8 and above.
    • 👍Great value for price, suitable for beginners and hobbyists learning manual focus.
    • 🤔Full-frame compatible despite APC-C listing, but lateral chromatic aberration at f/1.4-1.8.
    • 👎Close focus distance could be shorter; some users desire closer focusing.
25. Q2 2016100/1005.0★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharp autofocus, creamy bokeh, and minimal chromatic aberration, though noted it is pricey.

    • 👍Sharp autofocus and excellent image quality for portraits.
    • 👍Creamy bokeh and minimal chromatic aberration even wide open.
    • 👍Works great with Nikon D750 for baby and wedding photos.
    • 🤔Exceptional lens but considered a bit pricey by some buyers.
26. Q1 201667/1004.0★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised sharpness, bokeh, and value versus Olympus, but one reported unusable focus peaking and another found it unsuitable for bird photography in low light.

    • 👍Sharp edge-to-edge at f/2.0, dreamy bokeh, good color rendition.
    • 🤔Versatile for portraits and social events, but limited for distant subjects.
    • 👎Focus peaking on EM5 II does not work due to no electronic contacts.
    • 👎One reviewer found it a 'single use lens' with poor low-light bird photography performance.
27. Q2 201570/1004.5★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and versatility, but some noted focus issues at wide apertures and chromatic aberration.

    • 👍Excellent sharpness and bokeh for portraits and landscapes.
    • 🤔Focus accuracy at f/1.4-f/1.8 can be challenging; front focus reported on one copy.
    • 👎Significant chromatic aberration observed, comparable to older lenses.
    • 👎One copy lacked 'US' prefix despite US warranty, suggesting non-US market stock.
28. Q1 201580/1004.8★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise sharpness, bokeh, and low-light performance, but note chromatic aberrations and prefer the cheaper 1.8g version for value.

    • 👍Exceptional sharpness and clarity, especially on high-resolution bodies like D800e.
    • 🤔Chromatic aberrations noted; some prefer the 1.8g for sharpness and value.
    • 👍Excellent bokeh and low-light performance, great for portraits and sports.
    • 👎Build quality feels lighter/cheaper; not compatible with older F-type bodies.
29. Q4 201490/1004.8★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and build quality, but one notes aperture ring access is poor on the D7000.

    • 👍Excellent sharpness and beautiful bokeh at f/1.4.
    • 👍Solid build quality with metal sunshade and aperture ring.
    • 🤔Autofocus precision depends on camera body; best on D3/D4.
    • 👎Aperture ring hard to reach on Nikon D7000, causing return.
30. Q3 201495/1005.0★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens as a sharp, well-built bargain for portraits, with smooth manual focus and good low-light performance.

    • 👍Excellent value for money, especially compared to pricier alternatives.
    • 👍Sharp images even wide open, with good bokeh and low-light capability.
    • 👍Solid all-metal construction and smooth focusing ring.
    • 🤔Manual-only operation requires test shots to set exposure; not for beginners.
31. Q2 2014100/1005.0★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers in Q2 2014 praised the lens for exceptional bokeh, sharpness, and build quality, calling it a wise investment for portraits.

    • 👍Outstanding bokeh and sharpness, especially for portraits.
    • 👍Solid construction and balanced feel on full-frame cameras.
    • 👍Superior image quality compared to zoom lenses.
    • 👍Fast, quiet autofocus with improved contrast over older models.
32. Q1 201493/1004.7★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens as excellent for portraits, with amazing image quality, beautiful bokeh, and fast focus. One notes a plastic feel but accepts it for lightness.

    • 👍Excellent portrait lens with amazing image quality and beautiful bokeh.
    • 👍Fast and accurate autofocus, works well wide open.
    • 🤔Plastic build reduces tactile feel but keeps lens light.
    • 👍Adorama credited shipping cost when delivery was delayed.
33. Q4 201396/1004.9★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for exceptional sharpness, creamy bokeh, and solid build, calling it the best portrait lens.

    • 👍Sharpness and image quality exceed expectations, even wide open.
    • 👍Bokeh and subject-background separation are outstanding.
    • 👍Build quality is solid, with all-metal construction including the hood.
    • 👎Hood cannot be reversed for storage, increasing risk of loss.
34. Q3 201376/1004.5★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the sharpness, bokeh, and build, but consistently report chromatic aberration at wide apertures outdoors and slow autofocus.

    • 👍Extremely sharp images with creamy bokeh, especially for portraits and low light.
    • 👎Chromatic aberration (green/magenta fringing) is problematic when shooting wide open in bright conditions.
    • 🤔Autofocus is slow but accurate; some users fixed back-focusing via camera AF fine-tune.
    • 👎Refurbished unit had scuffs and internal dust; build quality concerns on secondhand copies.
35. Q2 201388/1004.8★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers rave about excellent image quality, creamy bokeh, and sharpness. Many consider it a dream lens for portraits and low light. Some note loud AF and a learning curve.

    • 👍Stunning bokeh and sharpness; a dream lens for portraits.
    • 🤔AF motor is a bit loud, but image quality compensates.
    • 🤔Manual focus learning curve; rewarding once mastered.
    • 👍Great value compared to pricier alternatives; solid build.

Basierend auf 219 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.