Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

★★★★★ 4.6 (568)

{ "review": "Dank eines überarbeiteten optischen Aufbaus mit drei asphärischen und zwei UD-Linsen sowie einer konstanten f/2.8-Blende über den gesamten 16-35mm Brennweitenbereich liefert dieses L-Objektiv eine hohe Randschärfe und minimiert chromatische Aberrationen. Die SWC-, Air Sphere- und Fluor-Vergütungen bekämpfen wirkungsvoll Lens Flare und Geisterbilder, während das wetterfeste Gehäuse auch bei schlechtem Wetter einen sorgenfreien Einsatz erlaubt. Am besten eignet es sich für Landschafts- und Architekturfotografen, die ein professionelles Weitwinkelzoom mit durchgängiger Lichtstärke und präzisem Ultraschall-Autofokus benötigen." }

Focal length 16-35mm
Aperture f/22
Mount Canon EF
Weather Sealed Ja
Weight 790 g
af type USM
lens type zoom
Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lens
64 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

The 30-Second Version

This lens crushes it with autofocus in the 94th percentile and optical quality in the 89th, making it a top performer for sharp, fast wide-angle shooting. The constant f/2.8 is great for low light, but the lack of stabilization and mediocre bokeh are the main trade-offs. It's a professional workhorse that's a steal if you can snag a refurbished deal.

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • Blazing fast USM autofocus, in the 94th percentile 94th
  • Excellent optical quality with top-tier sharpness and contrast 90th
  • Constant f/2.8 aperture for consistent low-light shooting 85th
  • Robust weather sealing for tough conditions 75th
  • Useful 0.22x max magnification for close-up details

Nachteile

  • No image stabilization, a real miss for handheld video
  • Bokeh is underwhelming, ranking in the 28th percentile
  • Build quality is just average for its class
  • Hefty 790g weight for a wide zoom
  • Minimum aperture of f/22 limits deep depth of field options

Was Besitzer sagen

The Word on the Street

4.6/5 (568 reviews)
👍 DSLR filmmakers are particularly impressed, finding the lens solves issues with soft, muddy video quality they've had with other glass.
👎 A landscape and astrophotography shooter on a crop-sensor body was disappointed, feeling the real-world results didn't live up to the f/2.8 hype.

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '16: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ1 '17: 5.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ2 '17: 5.0★ · 7 BewertungenQ3 '17: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ4 '17: 4.7★ · 3 BewertungenQ1 '18: 5.0★ · 5 BewertungenQ2 '18: 4.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ4 '18: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ1 '19: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ2 '19: 5.0★ · 5 BewertungenQ3 '19: 4.7★ · 3 BewertungenQ4 '19: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ1 '20: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '20: 5.0★ · 7 BewertungenQ3 '20: 3.8★ · 4 BewertungenQ4 '20: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '21: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 1 Bewertung437435242534174211222131211Q4 '16Q3 '17Q2 '18Q2 '19Q1 '20Q4 '20Q2 '22Q1 '23Q3 '25Q2 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der BewertungenGeschätztes Datum

Basierend auf 77 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Performance

This lens is all about getting the shot quickly and cleanly. The USM autofocus is near-instantaneous and dead silent, which is why it's one of the best we've seen for AF performance. Optically, it's a leader in its class. The combination of SWC and Air Sphere coatings does a fantastic job of killing flare and ghosting, so your backlit landscapes and cityscapes keep their contrast. Sharpness is excellent from corner to corner, even wide open at f/2.8, though you'll see the best results stopped down a bit. The constant f/2.8 aperture is great for low light, but don't expect much subject isolation. Bokeh quality is a weak spot, landing in the 28th percentile, so this isn't the lens for creamy backgrounds. It's a tool built for context, not compression.

Performance Percentiles

AF 94.4
Bokeh 24.1
Build 54
Macro 42.4
Optical 90
Aperture 21
Versatility 74.5
Nutzerresonanz 85.1
Stabilization 37.8

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 16
Focal Length Max 35
Elements 16
Groups 11
Aspherical Elements 3
ED Elements 2
Coating SWC, Air Sphere, and Fluorine Coatings

Aperture

Max Aperture f/22
Min Aperture f/2.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Canon EF
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.8 kg / 1.7 lbs
Filter Thread 82

AF & Stabilization

AF Type USM
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 280
Max Magnification 0.22x

vs Competition

Stacked against the competition, this Canon is a specialist. The Sigma 16-300mm and Tamron 18-300mm are superzooms that trade outright optical quality for massive versatility, making them better all-in-one travel lenses. The Panasonic LUMIX S 28-200mm is for a different mount system entirely, so it's not a direct fight. Where the Canon really pulls ahead is in pure image quality and AF speed. It's a lens for the working pro who needs a reliable, fast wide zoom for events, real estate, or landscapes. If you need stabilization or a longer reach, you'll be looking at those competitors, but you'll be giving up the critical sharpness and low-light capability this f/2.8 constant aperture provides.

Spec Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12060 Sony G SELP28135G.SYX
Focal Length 16-35mm 17-70mm 17-28mm 16-28mm 12-60mm 28-135mm
Max Aperture f/22 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/4
Mount Canon EF Fujifilm X Nikon Z Sony E Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Stabilization false true false false true true
Weather Sealed true true true true true true
Weight (g) 790 544 450 450 320 420
AF Type USM RXD Stepping Motor Stepping AF Motor linear motor SSM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilityNutzerresonanzStabilization
Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM 94.424.15442.4902174.585.137.8
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare 53.787.469.685.99184.689.385.183.4
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare 87.487.475.985.98884.667.368.837.8
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN Compare 87.487.475.977.897.284.66862.737.8
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12060 Compare 98.187.484.651.99184.693.167.883.4
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX Compare 94.478.477.734.18867.192.455.793.4

Preis

Value & Pricing

Pricing on this lens is all over the map, with a spread of over $317,000 across vendors, which is frankly absurd. You'll find it listed anywhere from $430 for a renewed model to some wildly inflated prices you should ignore completely. The sweet spot is clearly on the lower end of that range. For the optical and AF performance you're getting, a price around the $1,000 mark for a used or refurbished copy is a solid deal. Just make sure you're buying from a reputable seller with a warranty, like B&H's 1-year coverage on refurbished units.

Wir verfolgen die Preise für dieses Produkt seit dem 29. Mai 2026. Das Diagramm erscheint, sobald mehr Daten vorliegen.

Mehr erfahren

Overview

The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM is a workhorse wide zoom that lands in the 94th percentile for autofocus speed in our database, making it a top-tier choice for fast-paced shooting. The optical quality is a standout too, sitting in the 89th percentile, which means you're getting exceptional sharpness and contrast across the frame thanks to that revamped design with three aspherical and two UD elements. It's built for full-frame EF mount cameras, weighs 790g, and carries that red ring with confidence.

Common Questions

Q: Is this lens good for astrophotography?

It can work, but it's not ideal. The f/2.8 aperture is decent for gathering light, but the 16mm focal length on a full-frame body is just okay for wide-field Milky Way shots. The bigger issue is the lack of stabilization, which doesn't matter on a tripod, but the bokeh and coma performance in the corners wide open may not be as clean as a dedicated fast prime. Some users on crop-sensor bodies have reported disappointment with the results.

Q: Does it have image stabilization?

No, it doesn't. This is one of the lens's main drawbacks, ranking in the 36th percentile for stabilization. You'll need to rely on your camera body's in-body stabilization if it has it, or use a tripod and faster shutter speeds to avoid camera shake, especially when shooting handheld video.

Q: How does the sharpness compare to the older version II?

The version III is a significant optical redesign. With three aspherical and two UD elements, plus updated coatings, it delivers much better corner-to-corner sharpness and contrast, especially at the wider apertures. Our optical score puts it in the 89th percentile overall, a clear step up from its predecessor, which struggled more with edge softness.

Who Should Skip This

Hybrid shooters who do a lot of handheld video should look elsewhere. The lack of optical stabilization is a real handicap for run-and-gun work, and the 790g weight doesn't help. If you're a portrait photographer, the bokeh quality is a letdown, ranking near the bottom third of lenses we've tested. You'd be much happier with a fast prime. And if you're on a tight budget, the wild price variance means you have to hunt for a deal, and even then, a used version II or a third-party option might get you 90% of the performance for half the cost.

Verdict

The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM is a data-backed winner for anyone who prioritizes speed and sharpness above all else. The autofocus and optical scores are simply too good to ignore for professional work. The lack of stabilization is a real bummer for handheld video shooters, and the bokeh won't win any awards, but for its core mission of capturing tack-sharp wide-angle images quickly, it's one of the best tools you can put on a Canon EF body. If you can find a clean used copy at a fair price, it's an easy recommendation.

Usage Scores

Macro (54.5)Gesamt (63.8)Budget (70.5)Street (58.7)Travel (62.6)Portrait (48.8)Landscape (68.8)Professional (70.6)Video Cinema (60.1)Wildlife Sports (66.3)

Ähnliche Produkte