Jabra Evolve 75e MS

★★★★☆ 3.7 (71)

Mit der professionellen UC-Zertifizierung und einem 3-Mikrofon-System mit aktivem Talk-Zone-Filter sticht dieses Modell als erstes seiner Klasse für klare Anrufe in lauten Umgebungen hervor. Die integrierte Busylight-Funktion und die nahtlose Multipoint-Bluetooth-Umschaltung zwischen PC und Smartphone erhöhen die Produktivität im Arbeitsalltag spürbar. Diese Nackenbügel-Kopfhörer eignen sich am besten für Büroangestellte im Home-Office oder Callcenter, die ein zertifiziertes, komfortables Headset für ganztägige Sprachkommunikation benötigen.

form factor in-ear
driver type dynamic
Wireless Ja
active noise cancellation Ja
bluetooth version 4.2
battery life hours 14
water resistance IP54
multipoint Ja
Jabra Evolve 75e MS earbuds
45 Gesamtbewertung
Preis 0 ¥
Keine Angebote verfügbar
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

Was Besitzer sagen

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist seit dem Verkaufsstart abgekühlt
49/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysehohe Konfidenz · 78 Quellen · Juli 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '18: 3.9★ · 8 BewertungenQ2 '18: 4.2★ · 17 BewertungenQ3 '18: 3.9★ · 10 BewertungenQ4 '18: 2.7★ · 14 BewertungenQ1 '19: 4.0★ · 6 BewertungenQ2 '19: 3.8★ · 6 BewertungenQ3 '19: 3.8★ · 10 BewertungenQ4 '19: 2.3★ · 5 BewertungenQ2 '20: 3.0★ · 1 Bewertung81710146610511Q1 '18Q2 '18Q3 '18Q4 '18Q1 '19Q2 '19Q3 '19Q4 '19Q2 '20Q1 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der BewertungenGeschätztes Datum
  1. Q4 201938/1002.3★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise sound, comfort, and battery but report microphone failure within weeks, poor enterprise integration, and misleading noise cancellation.

    • Sound quality, comfort, and battery life are highly regarded.
    • Microphone on left earbud fails after ~45 days, causing scratching noise with ANC.
    • Noise cancellation only works during pauses, not while speaking as advertised.
    • Enterprise setup non-intuitive; transition between devices and call software integration poor.
  2. Q3 201968/1003.8★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised audio quality, call clarity, and multi-device connectivity, but reported right earbud failures, connectivity issues, and discomfort with ear gels and neckband design.

    • Excellent sound quality, fantastic microphone and call functionality, and seamless multi-device pairing.
    • Right earbud stopped working within a month; ANC and hear-through modes failed.
    • Comfort varied: ear gels don't seal well, earbuds uncomfortable over time, neckband weight caused shifting.
    • Connectivity issues developed over time; no Jabra mobile app support for Evolve 75e.
  3. Q2 201967/1003.8★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised sound quality, noise cancelling, and battery life, but noted app issues, fit discomfort, and ANC draining battery quickly.

    • Good sound quality and noise cancelling, especially on airplanes.
    • Battery life excellent but ANC drains it fast; not as advertised.
    • Smartphone app not working; Bluetooth connection issues.
    • Fit uncomfortable for some; music controls hard to operate.
  4. Q1 201970/1004.0★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise call quality, comfort, and Bluetooth switching, but report microphone degradation, poor audio for calls, and ear gel fit issues.

    • Call quality, noise reduction, and Bluetooth switching are excellent.
    • Microphone quality degrades over time; colleagues report robotic or cutting-out audio.
    • Ear gels fail to seal properly, affecting comfort and HearThrough feature.
    • Comfort and build are good, but unit falls off neck with collared shirts.
  5. Q4 201835/1002.7★14 Bewertungen

    Buyers reported frequent Bluetooth drops, poor comfort, weak ANC, and microphone issues. Sound quality was praised, but reliability and connection problems dominated feedback.

    • Bluetooth connectivity unstable, especially in crowded areas or when paired to multiple devices.
    • Earbuds uncomfortable for long wear, fall out easily due to poor fit and thin ear tips.
    • ANC ineffective; some units produced static or barely noticeable noise reduction.
    • Sound quality for music is good; battery life generally satisfactory.
  6. Q3 201874/1003.9★10 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised call quality, battery life, and multi-device connectivity, but many reported poor in-ear fit and mediocre noise cancellation.

    • Excellent call clarity and microphone performance for business calls.
    • In-ear fit issues common; some users struggled to get a secure seal.
    • Noise cancellation helps but does not block loud background noise completely.
    • A few users experienced garbled audio on iPhones and Skype.
  7. Q2 201872/1004.2★17 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised comfort, battery life, and call clarity. Some reported poor noise cancellation, signal issues, and robot-like sound quality.

    • Comfortable for all-day wear, with good fit and earbud options.
    • Excellent battery life lasting a full day or more.
    • Noise cancellation praised by some, called poor by others.
    • Signal loss, robot-like sound, and background noise issues reported.
  8. Q1 201863/1003.9★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised battery life, ANC, and connectivity, but some reported poor microphone call quality and discomfort for all-day wear.

    • Battery life meets or exceeds expectations for daily use.
    • Microphone picks up ambient noise and voice cuts out during calls.
    • ANC effective for office and gym environments.
    • Comfort is good for some but not suitable for all-day wear.

Basierend auf 78 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

Anc 93.2
Mic 86.9
Build 34.6
Sound 66.8
Battery 14
Comfort 28.2
User Sentiment 4
Connectivity 86.6
Nutzerresonanz 48.8

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style neckband
Ear Tips multiple sizes of ear gels included

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Driver Size 15
Freq Min 20
Freq Max 20000

Noise Control

ANC Yes
ANC Type hybrid
Transparency Yes

Connectivity

Wireless Yes
Bluetooth 4.2
Multipoint Yes

Earbud Battery

Battery Life 14
Charge Time 2
Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Charging USB-C

Microphone

Microphone Yes
Mic Count 3
NC Mic Yes

Features

Voice Assistant Siri, Google Now
Touch Controls Yes
App Jabra Direct
Water Resistance IP54

Im Vergleich

Spec Jabra Evolve 75e MS Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-K Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Sony WF-1000XM6 Google Pixel Buds Pro EarFun Air Pro 4+
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic hybrid
Wireless true true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation true true true true true true
Bluetooth Version 4.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 6.0
Battery Life Hours 14 8 6 8 11 12
Case Battery Hours - 28 18 24 31 54
Water Resistance IP54 IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IP55
Multipoint true true true true true true
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivityNutzerresonanz
Jabra Evolve 75e MS 93.286.934.666.81428.2486.648.8
Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-K Compare 97.397.280.79981.671.692.199.180.3
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Compare 97.391.280.796.747.194.292.197.989.6
Sony WF-1000XM6 Compare 97.399.880.788.678.471.649.997.980.3
Google Pixel Buds Pro Compare 97.382.680.793.384.771.697.195.389.6
EarFun Air Pro 4+ Compare 97.397.291.899.796.171.697.199.389.6

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Calls (62.1)Music (42.1)Gesamt (45)Budget (47)Gaming (51.9)Travel (43.6)Commute (42.7)Fitness (23.9)

Ähnliche Produkte