Team Group MP44S 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

Team Group MP44S 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

Team Group
68 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Team Group MP44S 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

92 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价

用户对这款SSD的评价非常积极,称赞其性能、与Steam Deck和ROG Ally的兼容性以及性价比。已验证买家强调安装简单、游戏加载速度快,其中一位成功升级了戴尔Inspiron。一些人提到品牌可靠性和良好的客户服务,而一位用户建议不要用于台式机。

优点
  • 游戏加载速度快
  • 安装简单
  • 兼容Steam Deck和ROG Ally
  • 性价比高
  • 品牌可靠
缺点
  • 不建议用于台式机
  • 仅限于2230规格
👍 Performance 4
👍 Compatibility 5
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Ease of installation 3
👍 Brand reliability 2
👍 Customer service 1

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Laptop
Team Group
65
Seagate
91
Gaming
Team Group
60
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
46
Seagate
84
Workstation
Team Group
60
Seagate
83
Budget
Team Group
71
Seagate
73
Portable
Team Group
15
Seagate
24

规格

Team Group MP44SSeagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
1,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2230M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
3,500
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)
480,000
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
500,000
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
250
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink—✗

优缺点

Team Group MP44S 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2230

  • Strong user sentiment (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong random (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong endurance (73rd percentile)
  • Strong speed (70th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation