Kingston NV3 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
58 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Kingston NV3 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
78 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
Kingston NV3 SSD 在易安装性、速度和日常使用可靠性方面普遍获得积极反馈。然而，多位用户指出价格大幅上涨，使其不如以前划算。一些问答回复强调它没有 DRAM，在持续写入时可能会变慢，但被认为足以满足典型的桌面和游戏使用。
优点
- 安装简便
- 性能快速
- 日常使用可靠
- 正常价格下性价比高
- 适合作为系统盘
缺点
- 价格大幅上涨
- 无DRAM（使用HMB）
- 持续写入时速度下降
- 500GB容量可能有限
Price fluctuation 3
Ease of installation 4
Performance 5
Reliability 4
Dram less design 3
Capacity limitations 3
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉，5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度，非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而，一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容，建议检查系统要求。
优点
- 5年质保
- 包含救援服务
- 高耐久性（5,050TBW）
- 快速顺序读写
- 支持DirectStorage
缺点
- 兼容性不保证
- 可能不适合所有电脑
Durability 1
Warranty 1
Performance 1
Compatibility 1
Directstorage support 1
评分
Laptop
Budget
Gaming
Console
Workstation
Portable
规格
| Kingston NV3 | Seagate FireCuda 530R | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | — | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | — | E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
优缺点
Kingston NV3 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Strong speed (70th percentile)
- Strong endurance (70th percentile)
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average capacity (27th percentile)
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
结论
胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R
Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 17 specs.