Crucial E100 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Crucial
59 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Crucial E100 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
两条已验证的评论都是正面的，称赞快速送货并推荐该硬盘用于备份。然而，样本量非常小，问答部分仅提供技术细节，没有情感倾向。总体而言，该产品似乎受到好评，但需要更多评论才能全面了解。
优点
- 快速送货
- 价格实惠
- 推荐用于备份
缺点
- 可用评论有限
Delivery speed 1
Value for money 1
Backup suitability 1
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉，5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度，非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而，一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容，建议检查系统要求。
优点
- 5年质保
- 包含救援服务
- 高耐久性（5,050TBW）
- 快速顺序读写
- 支持DirectStorage
缺点
- 兼容性不保证
- 可能不适合所有电脑
Durability 1
Warranty 1
Performance 1
Compatibility 1
Directstorage support 1
评分
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Workstation
Budget
Portable
规格
| Crucial E100 | Seagate FireCuda 530R | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | — | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | — | E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✗ |
优缺点
Crucial E100 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong capacity (78th percentile)
- Strong speed (74th percentile)
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
结论
胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R
Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.