Team Group MP44 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group MP44 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group
89 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 综合评分

买家怎么说

Team Group MP44 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

88 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价

用户对这款Team Group SSD的评价非常积极,称赞其速度、可靠性和性价比。许多人推荐用于游戏和日常使用,指出尽管没有DRAM,它仍然表现出色。一些人提到它不是大文件写入最快的,但对普通用户来说非常出色。

优点
  • 快速读写速度
  • 性能可靠
  • 性价比高
  • 适合游戏
  • 适合日常使用
缺点
  • 无DRAM
  • 大文件写入不是最快
👍 Speed 6
👍 Reliability 5
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Gaming suitability 3
🤔 Dram absence 3
👍 Brand trust 3

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉,5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度,非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而,一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容,建议检查系统要求。

优点
  • 5年质保
  • 包含救援服务
  • 高耐久性(5,050TBW)
  • 快速顺序读写
  • 支持DirectStorage
缺点
  • 兼容性不保证
  • 可能不适合所有电脑
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

评分

Laptop
Team Group
89
Seagate
91
Gaming
Team Group
84
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
83
Seagate
84
Workstation
Team Group
78
Seagate
83
Budget
Team Group
78
Seagate
73
Portable
Team Group
23
Seagate
24

规格

Team Group MP44Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
4,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
7,400
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
6,900
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)
650,000
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)
660,000
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerMaxioE18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
2,000
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,600,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✗

优缺点

Team Group MP44 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong random (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average affordability (16th percentile)16th %ile

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

结论

★ 胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 5 of 17 specs.

Team Group MP44 更擅长:

Budget

Seagate FireCuda 530R 更擅长:

GamingLaptopWorkstation