LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B 27" Black 2026
The 27-inch QHD IPS panel delivers 300Hz refresh rate and 1ms GtG response time, with VESA DisplayHDR 400 and 95% DCI-P3 color coverage for vivid, tear-free gaming via FreeSync Premium and G-Sync compatibility. Its ergonomic stand offers height, tilt, swivel, and pivot adjustments, plus USB-C connectivity and a 5/5 customer rating from 16 reviews. Best for competitive FPS players who need high refresh rates and low latency for fast-paced matches.
現在、販売店の最新価格はありません
概要
The 30-Second Version
The LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B is a 27-inch QHD IPS gaming monitor with a blazing 300Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time, priced around $279-$300 USD. It supports both G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync Premium, so it works with any GPU. The HDR is weak and there's no built-in speakers, but for competitive gaming at this price, it's a steal. If you're an esports player on a budget, buy it. If you want cinematic HDR, look at OLED instead.
Pros & Cons
長所
- 300Hz refresh rate puts it in the top tier for motion clarity 91st
- QHD IPS panel with 93% DCI-P3 color coverage looks genuinely good 91st
- Both G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync Premium support means it works with any GPU 88th
- Ergonomics are excellent with height, tilt, swivel, and pivot adjustments 85th
- PIP/PBP support is a nice bonus for multitaskers
短所
- DisplayHDR 400 is basically fake HDR, don't expect real contrast
- 400 nits brightness is fine for a dark room but struggles in bright spaces
- No built-in speakers, so you'll need headphones or external audio
- User sentiment data is nearly nonexistent, which is a red flag for long-term reliability
- At 4581g it's on the heavier side, and the stand takes up real desk space
オーナーの声
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
実証データ
Performance
The headline number here is 300Hz, and that puts this panel in the top tier of what we track. Our database ranks its performance at the 91st percentile, which means it's outpacing the vast majority of gaming monitors out there. The 1ms GtG response time keeps ghosting to a minimum, so fast camera pans in shooters or racing games stay crisp instead of turning into a blurry mess. If you're coming from a 144Hz or even 240Hz panel, you'll notice the difference in motion clarity immediately.
The QHD resolution is the smart pairing here. 2560 x 1440 at 27 inches gives you a pixel density that's sharp enough for text and detail work, but it's not so demanding that you need a $1,500 GPU to push 300 frames. A mid-range card like an RTX 4070 or RX 7800 XT can actually hit those frame rates in competitive titles like Valorant, CS2, or Overwatch. That's the real-world implication: this monitor is fast enough to justify, but not so demanding that only flagship rigs can feed it.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 (QHD) |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved | No |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 300 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 400 nits |
| Color Gamut | 93% DCI-P3 |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 2 |
| USB-C | 0 |
| Speakers | No |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | Yes |
| Tilt | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes |
| Pivot | Yes |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 |
Features
| Webcam | No |
| PIP/PBP | Yes |
| Weight | 4.6 kg / 10.1 lbs |
vs Competition
The most direct comparison is against the OLED crowd. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG and MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 both offer 1440p at high refresh rates, but with true HDR and perfect blacks. They also cost a lot more. The Samsung Odyssey G60SD and Gigabyte MO27U2 SA are in a similar boat. If you play a lot of single-player games with dark scenes, those OLED panels are genuinely better. The contrast difference is night and day, literally.
But here's the thing: for competitive gaming, the LG holds its own. The 300Hz refresh rate matches or beats most of those OLED options, and the IPS panel doesn't have the burn-in risk that OLED owners worry about. The Alienware AW2725D is another 1440p high-refresh option, but again, you're paying a premium for the OLED tech. If your game library is mostly Valorant, Apex, CS2, and the occasional YouTube video, the LG is the smarter buy. If you're playing Cyberpunk or Alan Wake 2 in a dark room, save up for the OLED.
| Spec | LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B 27" | ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 | Samsung Odyssey G60SD | Dell UltraSharp U4025QW | Apple Studio Display XDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 39.70000076293945 | 27 |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 5120 x 2160 | 5120 x 2880 |
| Panel Type | IPS | OLED | QD-OLED | QD-OLED | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Refresh Rate | 300 | 240 | 240 | 360 | 120 | 120 |
| Response Time Ms | 1 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 5 | - |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | Adaptive-Sync | Adaptive-Sync |
| Hdr | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR10+ | DisplayHDR 600 | HDR |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | Color | 携帯性 | Display | Feature | User Sentiment | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | ユーザー評価 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B 27" | 88.3 | 13.1 | 72.3 | 84.8 | 4.2 | 90.6 | 90.8 | 75.3 | 66.5 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG Compare | 96.2 | 58.8 | 97.9 | 84.8 | 99.1 | 90.6 | 98 | 82 | 99.4 |
| MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare | 99.1 | 58.8 | 79 | 84.8 | 95.6 | 90.6 | 98 | 82 | 99.4 |
| Samsung Odyssey G60SD Compare | 91.1 | 40.8 | 79 | 69.8 | 95.6 | 90.6 | 99.6 | 87.9 | 95.2 |
| Dell UltraSharp U4025QW Compare | 97.8 | 77.3 | 98.7 | 96.2 | 0 | 90.6 | 56.4 | 99.4 | 95.2 |
| Apple Studio Display XDR Compare | 99.7 | 81.9 | 99.4 | 94.4 | 74.5 | 66.6 | 56.4 | 90.3 | 67.3 |
価格
Value & Pricing
At $279 to $300 USD, this monitor is aggressively priced for what you get. A 300Hz QHD IPS panel with this level of ergonomic adjustability would have been a $500+ product not long ago. The fact that LG is shipping it with both adaptive sync standards supported means you're not locked into one GPU vendor either. That's real flexibility for the money.
The value proposition gets even better when you look at what the competition charges. The ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG and MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 are both excellent monitors, but they're OLED panels that cost significantly more. If you're a competitive gamer who prioritizes frame rates over perfect blacks, this LG gets you 90% of the way there for a fraction of the price. The trade-off is HDR performance and contrast, but for esports titles, those barely matter.
詳細情報
Overview
LG's UltraGear line has been a staple for gamers who want speed without selling a kidney, and the 27G64NA-B slots right into that sweet spot. You're getting a 27-inch QHD IPS panel running at 300Hz with a 1ms response time. That's a combo that would have cost double just a few years ago. The pitch is simple: esports-level speed with enough resolution to actually enjoy single-player games too.
This monitor is aimed at competitive players who don't want to compromise on picture quality. The IPS panel means you get better viewing angles and color than the TN panels that used to dominate the high-refresh space. With 93% DCI-P3 coverage and DisplayHDR 400, it's not just a twitch-shooter machine. It can handle some content creation and movie watching without looking washed out.
What makes this interesting is the price point. We're seeing this thing listed between $279 and $300 USD, and around $290 CAD. For a 300Hz QHD IPS panel with both G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync Premium support, that's aggressive. LG is basically saying you don't need to spend OLED money to get a serious gaming display. And honestly, for a lot of people, they're right.
Common Questions
Q: Does this monitor have built-in speakers?
No, the 27G64NA-B does not have built-in speakers. You'll need to use headphones through the 3.5mm headphone jack or connect external speakers to your PC or console. For a gaming monitor at this price, that's pretty standard, but it's worth knowing before you buy if you were hoping for an all-in-one setup.
Q: Can I use this monitor with my PS5 or Xbox Series X?
Yes, but with some caveats. The PS5 and Xbox Series X support 1440p output, and this monitor has two HDMI ports, so you can connect either console. However, the PS5 doesn't support FreeSync over HDMI, so you'll rely on the monitor's standard VRR support. Also, the PS5 caps at 120Hz, so you won't hit the full 300Hz. For console gaming, this monitor works fine, but it's really built for PC gaming where you can actually push those frame rates.
Q: Is the HDR any good on this monitor?
Honestly, no. DisplayHDR 400 is the lowest tier of HDR certification, and 400 nits of peak brightness isn't enough to produce meaningful HDR highlights. The monitor will accept an HDR signal and technically display it, but the contrast and brightness won't be dramatically different from SDR. If HDR is a priority for you, look at monitors with DisplayHDR 600 or higher, or consider an OLED panel.
Q: What's the difference between this and the OLED gaming monitors at similar sizes?
The main differences are contrast, HDR performance, and price. OLED panels like the ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG or MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 offer perfect blacks and much better HDR, but they cost significantly more and carry a small risk of burn-in over time. This LG uses an IPS panel, which has worse contrast but no burn-in risk and a lower price. For competitive gaming where speed matters most, the LG is the better value. For cinematic single-player games, OLED wins.
Who Should Skip This
If you're primarily a single-player gamer who cares about visual fidelity, this monitor isn't for you. The DisplayHDR 400 certification and 400 nits of brightness mean dark scenes won't have the depth and contrast you'd get from an OLED or mini-LED panel. Games like Cyberpunk 2077, Alan Wake 2, or Resident Evil remakes deserve better HDR than this can deliver. Look at the ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG or Samsung Odyssey G60SD instead.
Content creators doing serious color work should also look elsewhere. While 93% DCI-P3 coverage is respectable, the lack of true HDR and the modest brightness make this a poor choice for professional photo or video editing. You'd want something with higher brightness, better HDR support, and ideally hardware calibration. This is a gaming monitor that happens to have decent color, not a color-accurate display that happens to game well.
Verdict
For competitive gamers on a budget, this is one of the easiest recommendations we can make. The 300Hz refresh rate, 1ms response time, and dual adaptive sync support cover everything you need for esports. The QHD resolution means you're not sacrificing desktop sharpness either. At under $300, it's hard to find a better speed-to-price ratio.
For content creators and HDR enthusiasts, this is a harder sell. The DisplayHDR 400 certification is the lowest tier, and 400 nits of brightness won't make HDR content pop the way a proper OLED or mini-LED panel will. The 93% DCI-P3 coverage is solid for color work, but if you're doing serious photo or video editing, you'll want something with better HDR and higher brightness. This is a gaming monitor first, and everything else second.