Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
明るいF2.8通しの超広角ズームながら、わずか107gの重さとステッピングモーターAFが際立つ。コンパクトな筐体に非球面3枚・ED3枚を含む13枚の光学系と防汚コーティングを搭載し、軽量ながら高い描写力を実現。Vlogやストリートスナップなど、機動力を重視するクリエイターに最適な一本。
概要
The 30-Second Version
The NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 hits the 91st percentile for user sentiment and the 88th percentile for optical quality. It's a rebadged Tamron design with a constant f/2.8 aperture, 450g weight, and internal zoom. No stabilization is the main trade-off, but at around $1,050 to $1,120 USD, the value is hard to beat.
Pros & Cons
長所
- Constant f/2.8 aperture in the 84th percentile for its class 91st
- Optical quality in the 88th percentile, sharp across the frame 89th
- 450g weight makes it a gimbal-friendly wide zoom 88th
- Internal zoom and focus design, barrel never extends 86th
- Weather sealed with a 9-blade diaphragm for smooth bokeh
短所
- No optical stabilization, 37th percentile ranking
- Build quality in the 75th percentile, not S-line premium
- 17mm isn't as wide as the 14-30mm alternative
- 67mm filter thread means new filters if you're coming from S-line glass
オーナーの声
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
- Q4 202375/100
Most buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, compact size, and value, but one verified review reports poor resolution, suggesting a possible quality control issue.
- Sharp image quality and compact design praised by multiple users.
- Great for travel and event photography, pairs well with other lenses.
- One verified buyer found resolution terrible compared to other Nikon Z lenses.
- Internal zoom and build quality appreciated, though not premium trinity level.
- Q3 202367/100
Buyers praised the lens for being wide, light, and quick-focusing, but one reported excessive contrast and softness at 17mm.
- Wide on full frame, light weight, and no color fringing.
- Sharp, quick focus, and ideal for events.
- Too contrasty with harsh images, hard to correct in post.
- Sharper at 28mm than 17mm; disappointing compared to 24-200.
- Q2 2023100/100
Buyers praised this lens for real estate photography and video, citing sharpness, fast focusing, and gimbal compatibility.
- Excellent for real estate photography and videography, versatile and sharp.
- Fast and quiet autofocus, good bokeh, and creative potential.
- Gimbal-friendly design with no size change when zooming.
- Sharp edge to edge at all focal lengths.
- Q4 202280/100
Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, lightweight design, and f/2.8 aperture, ideal for travel and events. One review notes it's a great value at half the price of other f/2.8 lenses.
- Sharp, crisp image quality with minimal distortion.
- Lightweight and compact, perfect for travel and gimbal use.
- Fast f/2.8 aperture enables background blur and low-light performance.
- Great value compared to other f/2.8 ultra-wide zooms.
日付のある顧客レビュー 28 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。
実証データ
Performance
Optical quality hits the 88th percentile, which puts this lens in 'one of the best on the market' territory for wide zooms. The constant f/2.8 aperture ranks in the 84th percentile, and that matters more than the spec sheet suggests. You can shoot at 17mm or 28mm and not worry about your exposure shifting as you zoom. The 9-blade diaphragm gives you decent bokeh for a wide lens, landing in the 88th percentile there too.
Autofocus uses a stepping motor, and it's fast and silent. The AF performance sits in the 87th percentile, which is strong. Video shooters will appreciate that silence. Minimum focus distance is 190mm, and the max magnification of 1:5.26 puts macro capability in the 86th percentile. Not a true macro lens, but you can get close enough for some fun wide-angle detail shots. The one weak spot is stabilization. There isn't any, and that lands it in the 37th percentile. On a Z body with IBIS, you're fine. On one without, keep your shutter speeds up.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 |
| Focal Length Max | 28 |
| Elements | 13 |
| Groups | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.0 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 67 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 190 |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 |
vs Competition
Against the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN, the Nikon gives you full-frame coverage and a wider 17mm starting point, though the Sigma is lighter and cheaper. The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS has stabilization and more reach, but you're giving up the constant f/2.8 aperture and the low-light flexibility that comes with it. The Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 is a Micro Four Thirds lens, so it's not even playing the same game. The Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 covers way more range but sacrifices the wide end and the fast aperture. If you want a true ultra-wide with a constant f/2.8, this Nikon is the sweet spot between the pricier S-line options and the slower variable-aperture alternatives.
| Spec | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm | Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 XF | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 17-28mm | 18-50mm | 17-70mm | 35mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/1.7 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E | Sony E | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | false | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | false | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 450 | 290 | 544 | 180 | 306 | 326 |
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | stepping motor | RXD | STM (Stepping Motor) | Autofocus | Linear motor |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | prime | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | ユーザー評価 | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm | 85.5 | 89 | 74.2 | 85.5 | 87.5 | 86.3 | 90.9 | 67.9 | 67.5 | 36.1 |
| Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Compare | 85.5 | 84.4 | 85.4 | 91.5 | 81.2 | 86.3 | 80.4 | 78.6 | 89.9 | 36.1 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare | 53.8 | 89 | 67.3 | 85.5 | 90.3 | 86.3 | 63.6 | 89.6 | 85.5 | 81.3 |
| Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 XF Compare | 85.5 | 95.7 | 86.7 | 97.2 | 65.2 | 95.3 | 63.6 | 33.6 | 85.5 | 81.3 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.8 | 84.4 | 84.6 | 50 | 85.7 | 86.3 | 90.9 | 80.6 | 85.5 | 96.6 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 78.5 | 71.5 | 39.2 | 77.6 | 80.2 | 44.9 | 95.9 | 89.9 | 81.3 |
価格
Value & Pricing
At $1,050 to $1,120 USD, this lens undercuts Nikon's own S-line wide zooms by a significant margin while delivering optical performance in the 88th percentile. The value proposition is the strongest argument here. Owners consistently mention value for money as a top theme, and the 91st percentile user sentiment score backs that up. Canadian buyers are looking at $1,512 CAD, and Mexican buyers at $24,775 MXN. The Newegg bundles throw in filter kits and cleaning accessories, which sweetens the deal if you're starting from scratch.
詳細情報
Overview
The NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 sits in the 91st percentile for user sentiment in our database, and honestly, that tracks. You're getting a constant f/2.8 aperture, 450g of weight, and optical performance that lands in the 88th percentile. For a wide zoom that costs around $1,050 to $1,120 USD, those are numbers that make the S-line lenses sweat a little.
Nikon didn't build this one from scratch. It's a rebadged Tamron design, and that's not a knock. The 13 elements in 11 groups with 3 aspherical and 3 ED elements deliver sharpness that owners keep praising. The internal zoom and focus design means the barrel doesn't extend, which is a big deal if you're running this on a gimbal. Weather sealing is there too, so light rain won't ruin your day.
Common Questions
Q: Does this lens have image stabilization?
No, there's no optical stabilization built in. It ranks in the 37th percentile for stabilization among similar lenses. If you're using a Nikon Z body with IBIS, you'll get stabilization from the camera. On bodies without IBIS, you'll need to keep shutter speeds higher, especially at the 28mm end.
Q: How does this compare to the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4?
The 14-30mm goes wider at 14mm and has a slower f/4 aperture. The 17-28mm gives you f/2.8 for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field, but you lose 3mm on the wide end. The 17-28mm is also lighter at 450g and typically cheaper. If you shoot astro or low-light interiors, the f/2.8 wins. If you need the absolute widest view, the 14-30mm is the better call.
Q: Is this lens good for video work?
Yes, and that's one of the most common use cases from owners. The stepping motor autofocus is fast and silent, which ranks in the 87th percentile for AF performance. The internal zoom and focus design means the barrel doesn't extend, so balance on a gimbal stays consistent. The 450g weight is also a big plus for gimbal setups.
Who Should Skip This
If you're shooting on a Nikon Z body without IBIS and you do a lot of handheld work in low light, the lack of stabilization is going to bite. The 37th percentile stabilization ranking is the weakest part of this lens by a wide margin. Also, if you need the absolute widest field of view, the 14-30mm f/4 covers more ground at the wide end, even if it's slower. And if you're expecting S-line build quality, you'll notice the difference. The 75th percentile build ranking is solid but not exceptional. This lens is about value and optical performance, not premium feel.
Verdict
The 91st percentile user sentiment score isn't an accident. This lens delivers sharp images, fast autofocus, and a constant f/2.8 aperture in a package that weighs 450g. The lack of stabilization is the one real compromise, and if you're on a Z body without IBIS, that's worth thinking through. But for the price, especially compared to S-line glass, this is one of the easiest recommendations in the Nikon Z lineup.