Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm
Combining a constant f/2.8 aperture with a lightweight 445g build and weather sealing, this ultra-wide zoom stands out for full-frame Sony shooters needing portability without sacrificing speed. Its optical design, incorporating three aspherical and three ED elements with Ultra Multi-Coating, delivers sharpness across the frame while a 7-inch minimum focus distance enables dramatic close-up perspectives. This lens is best for landscape and architecture photographers who require a durable, fast wide-angle zoom for challenging outdoor conditions.
Panoramica
The 30-Second Version
The Rokinon AF 14-24mm f/2.8 is a lightweight, sharp ultra-wide zoom for Sony E-mount that delivers 90th percentile optical performance at a fraction of the cost of first-party glass. The 77mm filter thread is a standout feature for landscape shooters, and the autofocus is solid for both stills and video. Just make sure you shop around, because pricing is wildly inconsistent across vendors.
Pros & Cons
Pro
- Outstanding sharpness for the price, 90th percentile optically 90th
- Ridiculously light at 445g for a full-frame f/2.8 zoom 86th
- 77mm front filter thread, a rarity for ultra-wide zooms 85th
- Weather-sealed construction for peace of mind outdoors 71st
- Fast, quiet autofocus that works well for video
Contro
- No optical stabilization, which hurts for handheld video
- Bokeh is harsh and busy, not a lens for subject isolation
- Constant f/2.8 is nice, but the aperture range is limited overall
- Social proof is almost nonexistent, only 3 reviews in our database
- Massive price variance across vendors, from $959 to over $200k
Cosa dicono i proprietari
The Word on the Street
Le prove
Performance
Optically, this lens punches well above its weight. In our database, it lands in the 90th percentile for overall optical quality, which puts it in the same conversation as glass costing twice as much. Sharpness is excellent across most of the frame, even wide open at f/2.8, and the UMC coating does a solid job of controlling flare and ghosting when you're shooting into the sun. Autofocus is driven by a linear STM motor, and it's quick and quiet enough for both stills and video work. It ranks in the 86th percentile for AF performance, so it's not quite on the level of Sony's top-tier linear actuators, but it's more than capable for most shooting scenarios. The minimum focus distance of 7 inches gives you some fun close-up creative options too, with a max magnification of 1:3.85. Just don't expect creamy bokeh. The 9-blade aperture helps a bit, but at 28th percentile for bokeh, this lens renders out-of-focus areas with a bit of harshness that's typical for ultra-wides.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 14 |
| Focal Length Max | 24 |
| Elements | 15 |
| Groups | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 |
| Coating | UMC |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 1.0 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Linear STM |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 180 |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.85 |
vs Competition
The obvious comparison is against Sony's own G Master ultra-wide zooms, like the FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II. The Sony offers a more versatile range, better build, and superior autofocus, but it costs nearly three times as much as the Rokinon at its best price. The Rokinon holds its own optically, though, and the 14mm wide end is noticeably wider than 16mm for dramatic landscapes and architecture. Against something like the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8, the Rokinon goes wider and is lighter, but the Tamron has a stronger reputation and better resale value. The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art is probably the most direct competitor. The Sigma is heavier and more expensive, but it's built like a tank and has slightly better corner sharpness. The Rokinon's real trump card is that 77mm filter thread. Both the Sigma and Sony options require cumbersome rear filter systems, so if you're a landscape shooter who lives with a polarizer or ND filter, the Rokinon makes your life a lot easier.
| Spec | Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 14-24mm | 16-300mm | 18-300mm | 28-70mm | 28-200mm | 16-85mm |
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 | f/3.5 | f/2.8 | f/4 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E | Fujifilm X | Canon RF | L-Mount | Nikon F |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | false | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 445 | 615 | 92 | 495 | 413 | 59 |
| AF Type | Linear STM | HLA | VXD linear motor | STM | Autofocus | AF-S |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | macro | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Prodotto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Riscontro degli utenti | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rokinon AF IO1424AFZ-E 24mm | 85.5 | 27.9 | 71.4 | 85.4 | 89.9 | 24.2 | 69.2 | 2.7 | 35.6 |
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare | 54.7 | 84.3 | 57.9 | 86.5 | 98.8 | 77 | 99.6 | 83 | 99.1 |
| Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare | 98.1 | 75 | 96.3 | 88.4 | 73.5 | 77 | 99.2 | 83 | 80.5 |
| Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare | 85.5 | 86.2 | 67.2 | 77.4 | 84.4 | 83.8 | 77.4 | 88 | 98.2 |
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare | 54.7 | 77.9 | 73.9 | 89.5 | 90.9 | 71.5 | 95.7 | 75.3 | 99.4 |
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Compare | 54.7 | 75 | 98.4 | 59.8 | 64.1 | 77 | 94.3 | 88 | 92.2 |
Prezzo
Value & Pricing
Pricing on this lens is a bit of a rollercoaster. Across the vendors we track, the Rokinon 14-24mm f/2.8 ranges from a very reasonable $959 all the way up to an absurd $217,249. Obviously, you should ignore the latter and hunt for the deals. At the sub-$1,000 end, this lens is a steal for the optical quality you're getting. It undercuts Sony's own ultra-wide zooms by a huge margin and even gives the third-party competition a run for its money. If you can snag it near the low end of that price spread, it's one of the best value propositions in the Sony E-mount ultra-wide space right now.
Amazon.it 1 offerta Da 1.662 €
Monitoriamo i prezzi di questo prodotto dal 3 mag 2026. Il grafico apparirà quando avremo più dati.
Approfondisci
Overview
If you're hunting for an ultra-wide zoom for your Sony full-frame camera that won't completely destroy your bank account, the Rokinon AF 14-24mm f/2.8 is one of the more interesting options out there. It covers a classic wide-angle range, packs a constant f/2.8 aperture, and somehow weighs just 445 grams. That's lighter than a lot of standard zooms, which makes it a pretty compelling travel companion for landscape and architecture shooters. The optical formula is no slouch either, with 15 elements in 11 groups, including three aspherical and three ED elements to keep things sharp and chromatic aberration in check. Weather sealing is a nice bonus at this price point, and the 77mm front filter thread is genuinely rare for an ultra-wide zoom. Most lenses in this class force you into expensive, clunky rear filter holders, so being able to screw on a standard ND or polarizer is a real quality-of-life win.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Rokinon 14-24mm f/2.8 good for astrophotography?
Yes, the fast f/2.8 aperture and excellent sharpness wide open make it a strong candidate for astrophotography, especially at the 14mm end where you can capture expansive night skies with minimal coma.
Q: Does the Rokinon 14-24mm f/2.8 have image stabilization?
No, this lens does not have optical stabilization, so you'll want to rely on your Sony body's in-body stabilization or a tripod for slower shutter speeds.
Q: Can I use screw-on filters with the Rokinon 14-24mm f/2.8?
Yes, unlike many ultra-wide zooms, this lens has a standard 77mm front filter thread, so you can easily attach ND, polarizing, or UV filters without a special holder system.
Q: How does the Rokinon 14-24mm compare to the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8?
The Rokinon is significantly lighter and usually cheaper, plus it takes standard 77mm filters, while the Sigma is heavier, more expensive, and requires a rear filter system but offers slightly better build quality and corner sharpness.
Who Should Skip This
This lens isn't for everyone. If you primarily shoot portraits or anything where subject isolation and creamy bokeh are key, look elsewhere. The 28th percentile bokeh rating means backgrounds will look busy and distracting. Videographers who rely heavily on handheld footage without a gimbal should also be cautious, since the lack of optical stabilization combined with the ultra-wide focal length can lead to jittery footage. If you need a more versatile zoom range for everyday shooting, something like a 16-35mm or even a superzoom like the Tamron 18-300mm would serve you better. And if you're the type who values a strong community of user reviews and proven long-term reliability before buying, the near-zero social proof on this lens might be a dealbreaker.
Verdict
Should you buy the Rokinon AF 14-24mm f/2.8? If you're a Sony shooter who wants an ultra-wide zoom for landscapes, architecture, or astrophotography and you don't want to sell a kidney to pay for it, the answer is a pretty enthusiastic yes. The optical performance is genuinely impressive, the autofocus is reliable, and the lightweight build makes it a joy to carry around all day. The lack of stabilization is a bummer for handheld video work, and the bokeh won't win any awards, but those are reasonable trade-offs for a lens that can be found for under a grand. The biggest red flag is the lack of social proof. With only a handful of reviews out there, you're betting a bit on Rokinon's reputation rather than a mountain of user feedback. But based on our testing and the specs, it's a bet worth taking if the price is right.